Page History

...

Issue 1 Dashboard and Progress Chart 

Working Group Meetings

Issue 2: At-Large has struggled to reflect/process end-user opinion; barriers to individual participation; perception of unchanging leadership group

...

Issue 2 Dashboard and progress chart

Etc for the 8 issues

______________________________________________________________________________________________

EXAMPLE DASHBOARD PAGE FOR EACH ITEM

At Large Implementation Plan – Issue #1 – Quality vs Quantity of ALAC Advice  (So that each item’s dashboard starts off with the important sections from the Board document and this is what each working group has to base their work on…however if any changes are made to the original proposal then these need to be identified and accessible (I am imagining that MISSI and NCSG will be watching like hawks to see what we are up to and how we are progressing) 

Final proposal: Staff, under the direction of At-Large leadership, has already begun to rework the website and Wiki to ensure that our “Policy Advice” pages are accurate and understandable. This will continue as volunteer and staff resources allow. We will also ensure that as documents are published, the classification of the document is clear.

Issue 1 Working group: to be completed once identified

Anticipated resource requirements

• Initially up to 40-50 hours of staff time between Jan 2019 through to June 2019 to improve clarity of wiki and web pages.
• When additional staffing resources are made available under Issue 3 Implementation, policy advice development work and communication will be a primary focus of existing staff resource time freed up from other activities.
• Differentiate between advice and comments, potentially other categories (i.e. correspondence).
• Develop communication of revisions to the pages to end users

Expected budget implications

Initially no additional, beyond already allocated, resources to At-Large. However, as noted in Issue 3, additional staff resources are needed for any ongoing work deemed necessary.

Proposed Implementation Steps

1. Finalize categorization of previous statements (comments, advice, correspondence, etc.)
2. Rename Sub Type to Document Type
3. Populate list options for document type based on document categorization exercise
4. Populate the “End User Interest” (EUI) field for previous comments
5. Begin logging EUI going forward

Metrics

1. Clear and Accurate Distinction between statement types.
2. Statements filterable by type
3. Populated EUI fields

Progress Chart (This details all activities that take place in order to implement the plan. It also needs to detail any key changes that take place to show that improvement is being made.)

Working Group Meeting 1 – date

Revised Implementation steps and metrics (for example)

Working group Meeting 2 - date

Etc