Page History

...

Issue #1: Quality vs Quantity of ALAC Advice

Working Group Leader (To be completed when identified)

Issue 1 Dashboard and progress chart (This will link to a page (see example below for Issue #1) that will set out the activities that have been agreed to by the Board from our proposed plan for Issue #1 – and can become a workspace for the work that is done on this issue by the working group)

Issue 2: At-Large has struggled to reflect/process end-user opinion; barriers to individual participation; perception of unchanging leadership group

Working Group Leader:

Issue 2 Dashboard and progress chart

Etc for the 8 issues

______________________________________________________________________________________________

...

At Large Implementation Plan – Issue #1 – Quality vs Quantity of ALAC Advice[MH4] Advice  (So that each item’s dashboard starts off with the important sections from the Board document and this is what each working group has to base their work on…however if any changes are made to the original proposal then these need to be identified and accessible (I am imagining that MISSI and NCSG will be watching like hawks to see what we are up to and how we are progressing) 

Final proposal: Staff, under the direction of At-Large leadership, has already begun to rework the website and Wiki to ensure that our “Policy Advice” pages are accurate and understandable. This will continue as volunteer and staff resources allow. We will also ensure that as documents are published, the classification of the document is clear.

Issue 1 Working group: to be completed once identified

Anticipated resource requirements

...

1. Clear and Accurate Distinction between statement types.
2. Statements filterable by type
3. Populated EUI fields

Progress Chart [MH5] 

Working Group Meeting 1 – date

Revised Implementation steps and metrics (for example)

Working group Meeting 2 - date

Etc

 [MH1]This will link to a page that sets out the preparatory activities for the

• Job description of the Issue Leaders
• How the implementation steps for the different issues should be approached
• Budgetary and staff implications, as well as volunteer support required

Expectation of metrics

 [MH2]To be completed when identified

 [MH3]This will link to a page (see example below for Issue #1) that will set out the activities that have been agreed to by the Board from our proposed plan for Issue #1 – and can become a workspace for the work that is done on this issue by the working group

 [MH4]So that each item’s dashboard starts off with the important sections from the Board document and this is what each working group has to base their work on … however if any changes are made to the original proposal then these need to be identified and accessible (I am imagining that MISSI and NCSG will be watching like hawks to see what we are up to and how we are progressing)

 [MH5]This details all activities that take place in order to implement the plan. It also needs to detail any key changes that take place to show that improvement is being made.)

Working Group Meeting 1 – date

Revised Implementation steps and metrics (for example)

Working group Meeting 2 - date

Etc