The next call is scheduled on 19 September 2013, 18:00 UTC . (Scheduled for 60 Min)
11:00 PDT, 13:00 CDT, 14:00 EDT, 20:00 CET, 06:00 Sydney (16.11)
for other places see:
Adobe Connect room:
http://icann.adobeconnect.com/r1onj8cflqp/
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-gac-ioc-20120919-en.mp3
On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#sep
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
Attendees
Lanre Ajayi - Nominating Committee Appointee
Alan Greenberg – ALAC
Osvaldo Novao -ISPC
Chuck Gomes - RySG
Kiran Malancharuvil – IPC
David Heasley - IPC
Jim Bikoff – IPC
Stéphane Hankins – International Committee of the Red Cross
Debra Hughes – NCSG
J.Scott Evans – IPC
Mary Wong - NCSG
Gregory Shatan – IPC
Apology :
Jeff Neuman - Registry SG group leader
Wolfgang Kleinwachter – NCUC
Avri Doria – NCSG
Thomas Rickert - Nominating Committee Appointee
Brian Peck
Margie Milam
ICANN Staff
Berry Cobb
Nathalie Peregrine
Agenda:
- Review of feedback on possible approaches
- Discussion
- Next Steps
Open Action Items:
- None
Remaining WG Schedule:
TBD
Adobe Connect Chat Transcript:
Nathalie Peregrine: GNSO RCRC/IOC Drafting Team Meeting Agenda 19 September, 2012
Nathalie Peregrine: Greg Shatan also sends his apologies
Chuck Gomes: I'm in
Mary Wong: NCUC & NCSG believe a full PDP is necessary, for reasons we've stated before. NCSG, in particular, would urge that the IGO issue form part of the context for such a PDP.
Debra Hughes: Thanks for your comment, Jim. RCRC agrees that protection could be granted in first round for IOC/RCRC without a PDP
Mary Wong: @Alan, doesn't the 2nd sentence in para 1 (starting with "Most of the group" answer your concern? We could add your name to Greg's if that would help clarify.
Greg Shatan: I have joined the call.
Mary Wong: Why not make the assumption explicit, so that we are clear in our message?
Alan Greenberg: @ requires a PDP on IOC/.RC, but that PDP may well cover a superset of organizations.
Kiran Malancharuvil/Jim Bikoff: I agree that the term "most of the group" is misleading. just because we were willing to be a part of the J.Scott compromise, doesn't mean we believe that there needs to be a PDP
Alan Greenberg: I don't think a PDP is needed for the 1st round ,but it is needed for our compromise
Osvaldo Novoa: My Call fell, I'm trying to reconnect
Osvaldo Novoa: I'm on again
Debra Hughes: I agree with Alan and Jim's comments regarding adding the names to the reserved names list - adding new terms could confuse the issue
Kiran Malancharuvil/Jim Bikoff: agreed greg
J. Scott: I agree with Greg too
Debra Hughes: Jim's proposed language sounds good
Kiran Malancharuvil/Jim Bikoff: so... what we just suggested, for clarification is: "a list of reserved names temporarily ineligible for registration at the second level during the first round, pending the resolution of a PDP."
J. Scott: I have to drop off this call.
Berry Cobb: It is a part of the condition.....I can reword that.
Berry Cobb: Perhaps we can create a footnote to recommendation 1 that this DT recognizes that a PDP may be intiated on IGO.
Berry Cobb: and that the Council consider that.
Debra Hughes: IFRC and American Red Cross agrees that the RCRC names should be allowed to be registered by National Societies, IFRC and ICRC
Alan Greenberg: I've got to drop off now (another call starting soon).
Berry Cobb: 21 and 21 for reply - total of 42
Mary Wong: Thanks, Chuck and everyone - good call. Bye!
