START TEMPORARY MSG:

Use this space to draft the CWG-RFP5 draft proposal.  Staff will link to this document in the draft documents section of the CWG Wiki.

Note, multiple authors can edit the document at the same time. Confluence recognizes when multiple persons are editing the document at the same time.  A notice will be presented to the user at the top of the document...

GENERAL DRAFTING PLAN

How do we want to structure the work of RFP5?

- follow the structure of the 5 questions and provide a table format as well that matches to documents, links, etc

- target audience in principle is the ICG. Also the chartering organizations

 

PLEASE NOTE:  ALL the Following Text is DRAFT ONLY and will be subject to frequent update and change. Please check back regularly and feel free to make input vias the Comments section, at the end of page  or edit Directly -> However please add edits annotating your changes with your initials <CLO> where possible

Sec 5.0

Introduction and Executive Summary:

...This section should explains how our community’s proposal meets these requirements and how it responds to the global interest in the IANA functions.

 ** Note: CWG-RFP3 and 4 has considered this in specific and greater detail in their work, outlined in the previous Sections <links>  and this section acts as a check and affirmation process,  confirming that the NTIA requirements as outlined have been addressed, [and to what extent]

 

In summary it is the opinion of the RFP-5 Work Team that ....   .... .... .... .... ... 

  • ...
  • ...
  • ...


Sec 5.1

Specification of Task:

...The assignment of RFP5 is to describe how the proposal meet the requirement from NTIA – As below...

 
 “V. NTIA Requirements
The NTIA has established that the transition proposal must meet the following five requirements:

 

    • Support and enhance the multistakeholder model;

 

    •  Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS;

 

    •  Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of the IANA functions;

 

    •  Maintain the openness of the Internet;

 

 

    • The proposal must not replace the NTIA role with a government-led or an inter-governmental organization solution.


Sec 5.2

Meeting of the Requirements from NTIA:

How (or to what extent) does this proposal meet the five (5) requirements for transition of IANA Oversight Stewardship as listed by NTIA.

Requirement

Y/N

  •  

 

Details / Notes

Affirmation/Statement by the WT

[Other]

Support and enhance the multistakeholder model;

 

Describe how and in what way / to what extent

[in how much detail? Overall, Component parts of the proposal (CC MRT etc.,]

 
Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS; 

Note: while it was the NTIA’s goal to maintain essentially the status quo that what we would like to see moving forward is a way to enhance the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS.

It is however posited that we answer => "..do we fulfill the intention of maintaining the security and stability,..." [ALT: we make a statement here that we do]

 

 Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of the IANA functions;

 Insert link to Wiki page / files accumulated by Staff from existing review(s) of IANA Customer Satisfaction Surveys and other relevant documents??? 

 Maintain the openness of the Internet;

 Describe how and in what way / to what extent  
Does not replace the NTIA role with a government-led or an inter-governmental organization solution.   



Sec 5.3

[Expanded Text Section addressing the 5 requirements]

 

Requirement

Pen Holder(s)

Support and enhance the multistakeholder model;

Avri
Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS; 

 Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of the IANA functions;

 

 Maintain the openness of the Internet;

 
Does not replace the NTIA role with a government-led or an inter-governmental organization solution. 



Draft Paragraphs for the text response to each requirement follow and are briefly outlined in the table above 

  1.  
    The transition proposal supports and enhances the multistakeholder model by [in as much as it... ...] is inclusive of and open to ... ... ... ... 

 

 

 

 

 

2. The maintenance (and enhancement) of the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS, is of course paramount to ... ... ... ...  and the proposal does this by ... ... ... ... ... ... 




 

 

 3. The needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of the IANA functions have been surveyed / established  .. ... ... ...  and the proposed model seeks to ensure they are met by  ... ... ... .. 

  • ....
  • ....
  • ....
  • ....
  • ....


 

 

4. The openness of the Internet, is maintained in the proposed model by ensuring that ... .... .... .... ...

 




 

5. Whilst the importance of having Government [expand to make note on Govs as ccTLD Operators?] effectively engaged as stakeholders within the [ insert specifics and or details] of/in the proposed model, it demonstrably does not replace the NTIA role with a government-led or an inter-governmental organization solution, by .... .... ..... ...... ......

  • No labels