The next Framework of Operating Principles Cross Community Working Group teleconferenceis scheduled for Thursday 16 June 2016 at 1700 UTC.
For other times: http://tinyurl.com/zrlsglw
Agenda:
Further to the email below and the Working Group’s discussion at our last meeting on 24 May, please find attached a draft version of an updated, proposed Final Framework document for your review and discussion at our next meeting on Thursday 16 June at 1700 UTC. You should all have received a calendar invitation and call-in details for this meeting from the GNSO Secretariat, so please check your mail settings or spam folders if you did not.
In reviewing the attached draft document, please note the following:
- Where the changes have been fairly substantial and/or substantive, we have indicated these by highlighting them in yellow.
- Where the changes concern the topics that are to be raised with the community during our session at ICANN56, staff has noted them via a Comment box with the phrase “for discussion in Helsinki” in red.
- In relation to the open questions that were in the Draft Framework, we have suggested possible Working Group responses and resolutions (highlighted in yellow) – these are based on the public comments received on those open questions. We anticipate further that this section of the Final Framework will likely be substantially rewritten, including to fold accepted responses into the main text of the final document.
- We have not as yet updated/amended the draft Charter template in Annex A – this will be done following the ICANN56 discussions and further Working Group deliberations.
Please note also that the open community dialogue session at ICANN56 is scheduled for Wednesday 29 June, from 1700-1830 Helsinki time. Staff will prepare additional notes based on suggestions made in the public comments for the topics to be raised at that session – agreed previously by our group to be:
(1) ensuring diversity in CCWG membership (on which a substantial number of comments were received);
(2) resolving budget and resource questions;
(3) defining consensus; and
(4) the role of a CCWG in implementation/post-closure
Meeting Transcript
Apologies: Annebeth Lange
