Members:  Stephen Deerhake, Eberhard Lisse, Kristina Hakobyan, Vadim Mikhaylov, Nenad Orlic, Danko Jevtovic, Nick Wenban-Smith, Nigel Roberts, Svitlana Tkachenko

Participants:   

Observers and experts:   Jaap Akkerhuis

Staff:  Bart Boswinkel, Bernard Turcotte, Kim Carlson

Apologies:   Peter Koch, Sean Copeland

Agenda: 

1. Welcome & Roll Call
2. Administrative Announcements
3. Action Items
    • Action 01: Staff to update policy doc version 1.32.
    • Action 02: Staff to re-circulate Google doc (and other formats) on decisions and oversight to the list.
    • Action 03: All to complete the table in doc on decisions and oversight.
    • Action 04: Staff to prepare process flow document, including the decision nodes.
4. Review of draft report – Bernard (report will be circulated on Tuesday)
5. Overview of decisions Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PufsgDnCMbQ9dP47t45aOa_T848dfW4PFNgLuMYGw0E/edit
6. Discussion / agenda meeting in Marrakech
    • Oversight
    • Exceptionally reserved
    • Stress testing
7. AOB
8. Next Meetings
    • 6 June 2019
    • 24 June 2019, 900-12:00 Marrakech

Documents:   

Recording:  Zoom Playback

Transcript:  EN

Chat Transcript:

05:05:49 From Kimberly Carlson : Welcome to the ccPDP on Retirement Working Group call on 23 May at 11:00 UTC. Calls are recorded and transcribed, which will then be posted on the wiki. Apologies from Peter Koch and Nigel Roberts
05:06:20 From Kimberly Carlson : Ah, Nigel is here after all
05:06:54 From Danko Jevtovic : Hi all. I will probably leave in one hour; I hope to observe interesting GNSO Council meeting on the Board resolution on the EPDP
05:07:04 From Svitlana Tkachenko : Hello!
05:13:31 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : I agree with this new terminology, nice and clear :)
05:13:54 From Stephen Deerhake : Thank you Nick as well...
05:14:25 From Stephen Deerhake : Danko, I hope to wrap this in an hour... ;-)
05:20:11 From bart.boswinkel : (hard code 90 days ?)
05:20:24 From bart.boswinkel : to are readdressed later in the convernation
05:20:33 From Allan MacGillivray : Like Nick, I stumbled over the use of the 90 day limit in this context.
05:30:47 From bart.boswinkel : please you note the language in the IANA naming function contract with respect to meaning and FoI
05:31:17 From Patricio Poblete : I think deferring it to the review process to be designed later is enough. No need for the last sentence.
05:31:47 From Allan MacGillivray : This is the text in the Bylaws” “(c) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Section 4.3, the IRP's scope shall exclude all of the following: (ii) Claims relating to ccTLD delegations and re-delegations;”
05:36:04 From Stephen Deerhake : Thank you Allan for the specific text...
05:38:12 From Stephen Deerhake : Patricio, can you flush out your viewpoint further?
05:41:12 From bart.boswinkel : @ Patricio
05:42:22 From bart.boswinkel : iti si a placeholder anyway:-)
05:54:43 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : An alternative way to express the 90 day time bar is that it could be done after that deadline subject to the IFO's agreement/ sole discretion.
05:55:03 From Allan MacGillivray : +1 Nick
05:56:10 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : And I do agree that there should be some obligation of diligence on the ccTLD operator to sort this all out but i'm worried about the lack of flexibility
05:57:54 From Eberhard Lisse : The Notice of Retirement shall also state that if the Manager wishes to apply for an extension to the Default Retirement Period that it must formally advise the IFO of this as soon as possible.
05:58:53 From Eberhard Lisse : Or something like
05:59:47 From Eberhard Lisse : … at the latest 9 month of the IFO having sent…
06:00:26 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : +1 Bernard (sorry Bart) the acknowledgement is a red hering I think
06:00:53 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : I'd be happy with that suggestion Bernard
06:02:30 From bart.boswinkel : Bernard’s way out works
06:04:10 From Danko Jevtovic : GNSO is moved, I am still with you ;)
06:07:01 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : been very useful meeting (sorry for being pedantic/ PITA)
06:10:15 From Bernard Turcotte : No I think it was productive We (staff) try our best working in vacuo but this is why we have this process because everyone has to get behind whatever we come up with
06:11:13 From Kimberly Carlson : Next call June 6th 17:00 UTC (last one before Marrakech)
06:11:37 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : ciao everyone, got to run to another meeting
06:12:01 From Bernard Turcotte : bye all
06:12:09 From bart.boswinkel : By e all
06:12:10 From Patricio Poblete : Bye!
06:12:16 From Danko Jevtovic : thanks Stephen, *.*
06:12:19 From Vadim Mikhaylov : Thank you! Bye!
06:12:19 From Kristina Hakobyan : thank you
06:12:23 From Joke Braeken : thanks all. bye
06:12:32 From jaap : bye
06:12:32 From Svitlana Tkachenko : Thank you! Bye!

  • No labels