ATTENDEES: 

Members:  David McAuley, Liz Le, Kristina Rosette, Scott Austin, Susan Payne

ICANN Org:   Bernard Turcotte, Brenda Brewer

Apologies:  Sam Eisner

** If your name is missing from attendance or apology, please send note to mssi-secretariat@icann.org **


Agenda:  Work on document

Recording

Documents:  IOT-ConsolidationSG-Rule 7 markup v6 11 07 2022.docx

Zoom Chat Transcript:

00:20:29    David McAuley (Verisign):    Steamy and 87/30 here in northern Virginia
00:22:07    David McAuley (Verisign):    I liked the Word doc - very nicely done
00:28:05    Kristina Rosette:    Have to step away for a couple minutes. apologies.
00:30:57    Kristina Rosette:    I'm back.
00:39:33    Scott Austin:    In subsection 3) has the term "suspended" been considered in lieu of "placed on hold" ? 
00:41:21    David McAuley (Verisign):    I could support use of the word suspend here
00:42:09    Kristina Rosette:    Support the change.
00:49:06    Liz Le - ICANN Org:    I also support the change
00:49:22    Bernard Turcotte:    29 minutes left in call
00:55:21    David McAuley (Verisign):    Interesting point
00:56:39    David McAuley (Verisign):    Thanks Kristina and Liz - this makes sense
00:56:41    Kristina Rosette:    Agree with Liz.  Either way, our group (as a whole) needs to be sure there is some publication requirement at some point.
01:03:26    Bernard Turcotte:    Time check 15 minutes left in call
01:04:15    David McAuley (Verisign):    I'll have a comment after Kristina
01:07:29    Scott Austin:    should we clarify "it" in b and c refers to the motion and not the party or counsel submitting the motion.
01:09:07    David McAuley (Verisign):    Good point, Susan
01:10:21    Kristina Rosette:    "It" is intended to refer to the party.
01:10:37    Kristina Rosette:    or, it was in my head when I suggested this type of provision
01:11:02    Susan Payne:    thanks Kristina
01:11:22    David McAuley (Verisign):    I thought it was clear that it was the party
01:13:17    Kristina Rosette:    We weren't intending to impose a new oath obligation.  Declaration is fine.  I don't recall off the top of my head what is currently in the IRP procedural rules
01:13:59    Liz Le - ICANN Org:    +1 Kristina
01:14:05    David McAuley (Verisign):    I would go with standard for IRP whatever that is in practice. The panel can well deal with misleading info and I think we can move forward with declaration
01:14:54    Kristina Rosette:    I don't recall a formal oath.  Declaration is fine for now.
01:16:35    David McAuley (Verisign):    Fine with nine
01:19:58    David McAuley (Verisign):    yes
01:20:07    Kristina Rosette:    Definitely not immediate after plenary. Either Wednesday or Thursday works for me.
01:20:11    David McAuley (Verisign):    wednesady is fine
01:20:21    Scott Austin:    Wednesday 
01:20:22    Kristina Rosette:    Thanks, all!


  • No labels