Terri Agnew:Dear all, Welcome to the At-Large Regional Secretariats Meeting on Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 14:00 UTC
Terri Agnew:meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/OpUQAw
Siranush Vardanyan:hi Terri and all
Siranush Vardanyan:hello everyone
Terri Agnew:Hi Siranush
Pavan Budhrani:hi all
Humberto Carrasco:Hello
Siranush Vardanyan:test
Silvia Vivanco:Hello everyone!
Maureen Hilyard:Hi everyone
Pavan Budhrani:hi all, i have just joined the call
Alan Greenberg:I suggest that she reconnect. This kind of thing happens at times
Siranush Vardanyan:done:)
Maureen Hilyard:Ive had to change laptops. My other machine worked for the ccNSO meeting but adobe didn't want to connect for this meeting for some reason :(
Satish Babu:Hi all
Silvia Vivanco:Hello Satish
Siranush Vardanyan:i was disconnected
Gisella Gruber:@ Siranush - we are calling you
Siranush Vardanyan:thanks, waiting for the dial out
Alan Greenberg:We can hear you but not well.
Wolf Ludwig:Sounds like a bad / fade connection ...
Siranush Vardanyan:thank you
Alberto Soto:Hi all! Sorry for being late
Maureen Hilyard:Much better Siranush
Heidi Ullrich:https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2950348
Glenn McKnight:Our Social Media call ran late just finished
Silvia Vivanco:Welcome Glenn
Gisella Gruber:Mohamed has joined the call
Glenn McKnight:Hi All
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Hello everyone
Gisella Gruber:Alberto Soto has joined the call
Siranush Vardanyan:welcome all
Heidi Ullrich:Thanks, Alan. These activities are under the stage of the external review. Thanks for expanding on that stage.
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:I object to the term calling it a 360 review. This term is ill-used. 360 review is a loaded term.
Terri Agnew:Welcome Olivier Crepin-Leblond
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/360-degree_feedback
Glenn McKnight:What is in the 360 review?
Glenn McKnight:What is the screen, purpose
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:but never mind re: my objection. It's not the first time ICANN misuses a term and not the last time either. I raise the problem with the Board Chair & he was unphazed.
Heidi Ullrich:@Glenn, the 360 review is basically the review itself as it seeks to get a full review of the AC/SOs.
Glenn McKnight:My question is what is the screening process, ie. participation, attendance, contributions etc
Glenn McKnight:Performance indicators
Glenn McKnight:If its functional?
Glenn McKnight:A sanity check
Terri Agnew:Welcome Aziz Hilali
Alan Greenberg:The session on Sunday in Singapore is not just for the "working party" It is for the entire group.
Aziz:Thank you Terri
Alan Greenberg:That is, the ALAC and RALO leaders.
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:My comment on using 360 review terminology: http://dilbert.com/strip/2004-03-12
Glenn McKnight:Great comic OCL
Aziz:sorry to be late
Alan Greenberg:@OCL, as I said, the term 360 review is a misnomer. BUt it is the one we are using for want of a better one.
Glenn McKnight:Similar to the old dance cards
Glenn McKnight:When will the new document be available
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Scott Adams should really be doing a complete book about ICANN.
Maureen Hilyard:@Heidi Sounds as if the new documents would be really useful for outreach - are these going to be booklets or brochures?
Evan Leibovitch:The old outreach vs "inreach" issue
Glenn McKnight:Outreach is new and Engagement is working with old
Wolf Ludwig:Agree on the *engagement* component -- "inreach" is a different issue!
Glenn McKnight:Nurturing and empowering term
Heidi Ullrich:@Maureen, it will be a double-sided 8.5 x 11 inch doc
Maureen Hilyard:@Alan.. engagement with ALSes "Inreach"?
Wolf Ludwig:Working with old" is Inreach, Glenn!
Evan Leibovitch:+1 Alan, but also not just awareness, but the need to convince the public that involvement in ICANN is a valid use of valuable volunteer resources
Humberto Carrasco:Dear All, Alberto has a electric power supply issue and he cannot participate via Adobe
Silvia Vivanco:The document relates to de-certification of ALS at the RALO LEVEL
Maureen Hilyard:I agree with you, Siranush
Silvia Vivanco:As I mentioned if you read the document you will see that there are specific procedures for EACH Ralo, each region does it differently
Humberto Carrasco:Dear all, this is our new draft (LACRALO)
Humberto Carrasco:When an ALS not vote in three consecutive elections will lose the right tovote. The same applies for non-participation in discussion lists forAt-Large and / or Working Groups, for 12 consecutive months. In either case,you automatically lose their voting rights and active status within LACRALO.If the owner had trouble exercise the vote, it shall only communicate inadvance informing replacement.The ALS will be notified about the change of status.You can recover their voting rights and status of assets, if within the next12 months performs all activities required to be considered an active ALS.Otherwise, from 24 months of inactivity, the President sent to the ALAC arequest to discredit the ALS.It is the responsibility of the President and Secretary, maintain regularcontact with ALS who are not participating, and shall reflect such contact.This is to keep the inclusive criteria already mentioned several times, toavoid decertifications .
Humberto Carrasco:we are still working about this
Alan Greenberg:Formal Rule:
Alan Greenberg:Decisions to de-certify an ALS shall require a 2/3 majority of the members of the ALAC who cast a vote as provided in the Rules of Procedure of the ALAC, and any decertification decision shall be subject to review as provided in the ICANN Bylaws, Article IV, Section 2. Reasons for the ALAC to pursue de-certification action, and to de-certify an ALS, may include persistent non-compliance with significant ALS requirements. The ALAC will provide advance notice to the ALS in question, and the ALS will have an opportunity to be heard and respond to the ALAC prior to a decision on de-certification. The ALAC will notify the ALS of its de-certification decision and provide information on requesting a review of the decision.
Silvia Vivanco:We got the statistics for APRALO already
Silvia Vivanco:regarding assistance to monthly meetings
Humberto Carrasco:Alberto has a electric power supply issue. This is because he is not here anymore.
Aziz:we may be defined ALS status
Aziz:Active, Less active and Standby
Silvia Vivanco:Yes they are already incorporated Siranush, I added LACRALO's draft as well
Heidi Ullrich:ATLAS II Recs to the Board: https://community.icann.org/display/als2/ATLAS+II+Recommendations+to+the+ICANN+Board
Humberto Carrasco:I cannot see 28 and 29
Humberto Carrasco:in the list
Heidi Ullrich:All ATLAS II recs: https://community.icann.org/display/als2/Post-ATLAS+II+Activities+Workspace
Terri Agnew:@all, Olivier has disconnected from audio. We will dial back out to him
Humberto Carrasco:Thanks
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:back
Silvia Vivanco:Ok I am taking note
Alan Greenberg:Evan fading...
Silvia Vivanco:I have added RALO-RIRs relationships as Agenda item
Silvia Vivanco:Thank you for this suggestion
Terri Agnew:we are locating the line
Silvia Vivanco:Congratulations to APRALO on this new MOU with Dot Asia and to NARALO for agreement with ARIN
Silvia Vivanco:we will have signing ceremonies in Singapore
Evan Leibovitch:Alan, nothing to do with Adigo. I am indeed fading :-p
Evan Leibovitch:Thanks!
Glenn McKnight:Question: Is all the RALO required to sign an agreement with the RIR?
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:@Glen:: not *required* but "encouraged"
Maureen Hilyard:@Alan.. I think that this is what we need to include in our documents
Alan Greenberg:@Maureen, Most definitely.
Alan Greenberg:Please mute!
Glenn McKnight:Ok now
Siranush Vardanyan:sorry, it was my son:)
Maureen Hilyard:+1 Olivier
Alan Greenberg:We wanted to create "MOU-envy" for those RALOs that did not have such an agreement.
Siranush Vardanyan:MOU envy - sounds good:)))
Silvia Vivanco: @ Alan :) :) !
Glenn McKnight:bye all
Evan Leibovitch:Gaining MOU-mentum
Alan Greenberg::-)
Heidi Ullrich:See you in Singapore!
Silvia Vivanco:I like that Evan!
Satish Babu 2:Thanks and bye!
Alan Greenberg:Bye all. Safe travels
Maureen Hilyard:Thanks Siranush. bye all
