Gary Hunt - UK Government:Good afternoon (just) from London... yes we can hear you!
Gary Hunt - UK Government:Ahhh, Mr Hickson!
judith hellerstein:hi all. good morning to all
nigel hickson:@Gary - greetings
Marilia Maciel:Hello all! Good morning!
judith hellerstein:sorry the app crashed and had to reboot
Marilia Maciel:Sure, Olivier!
Bill Drake:what is it you want to know?
Marilia Maciel:I may need to drop earlier, still dont know, but will let you know. Thanks.
Renate De Wulf:@ALL, please clearly say your name before speaking for the transcriber
Bill Drake:it is astonishingly anodyne
Marilia Maciel:I agree Bill
Tom Dale (GAC Secretariat):There is a useful blog on the non-paper by Sam Dickinson at http://linguasynaptica.com/deconstructing-the-wsis10-non-paper/
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:@Tom: I like Sam's analyses in general. Thanks for the pointer!
nigel hickson:Agree with Bill; but the process has driven us to this; traversity of all the work UNESCO, ITU, CSTD did !
Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Hello
Renate De Wulf:@Renate, welcome!
Marilia Maciel:Hi Renata! :)
Harold Arcos <Internauta Venezuela>:Hi all
Gary Hunt - UK Government:Tom (GAC Sec); Willthere be notes of this session available? Thanks, Gary UK
renata aquino:hi w/ a bitoj connectivity issues :)
Renate De Wulf:@Gary, we will post the recording on the wiki page and this will also be sent for transcription which will also be posted on our wiki page when available
Renate De Wulf:@Renata, hope it gets better
Gary Hunt - UK Government:Many Thanks Renate!
marilyn Cade:I support that we not submit comments, as we are
Marilia Maciel:Agree with Bill too. Of course we can comment on our capacity, but we should wait for the draft to reassess if there is something to do as a community.
marilyn Cade:the CCWG-IG, and not needed to have our comments. however, please do not misunderstand thee paper. and its elements. I do not support extending the deadline, as we need the zero draft.
judith hellerstein 2:I think the timing is too short for us to make comments and weshould spend more time on our Dublin meeting
Harold Arcos <Internauta Venezuela>:@Renate, will be presentation available? Can't download .pdf
marilyn Cade:Focus on the sesion in Dublin, please
judith hellerstein 2:@harold, there is no presentation just an agenda
Renate De Wulf:@Harold, all these documents (via the links) are available on our wiki page https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=43984275
marilyn Cade:ICANN may submit comments as an organization, however, that is not the CCWG-IG. The issues in the non paper are a topic for discussion in Dublin. I am assuming that ICANN might submit comments, but really, we are here to advise ICANN, not to step in front of ICANN, which to me means that we discuss and advise ICANN
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:@Marilyn: I don't think anyone has argued otherwise
judith hellerstein 2:on enhanced cooperation, that is already being done at the CSTD. Do they mean set it up in addition to the work at the CSTD
marilyn Cade:ICANN shoud join with others to continue work at CSTD on EC and support that broadly.
Bill Drake:I guess it depends how you read "full implementation of enhanced cooperation
Harold Arcos <Internauta Venezuela>:Thanks @Renate,
Bill Drake:I assume staff will say something, I'm just wondering do we need a parallel commnunity effort
marilyn Cade:Understand that the Non Paper is the initial roadmap to what will be int the zero draft-- I assume all are understanding that?
Harold Arcos <Internauta Venezuela>:Thanks @judith
Veni Markovski:I have to leave as I said in the beginning - thank you all for good discussion!
judith hellerstein 2:Bye Veni.
judith hellerstein 2:Thanks for your insight
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Thanks @Veni
judith hellerstein 2:I think the ship may have sailed already
judith hellerstein 2:Is Marilyn still on the call?
Renate De Wulf:coming back
Marilia Maciel:Btw, Diplo did an interesting language processing analysis of submissions: http://www.giplatform.org/barometer#.VeoKyiiid4A.gmail
Bill Drake:Personally I don't think we need such an exercise focusing on the non-paper inputs. Let's see what happens with the zero draft.
marilyn Cade:I am not sure that an analysis will serve us now,as there will be other submissions later... for the response to the Zero Draft... It seems to me to be more important to focus on the Zero Draft... as there is limited time... perhaps we wait now and do an analysis re the Zero Draft...
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:The Google DOC table which I am alluding to is on: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/123i-g_sjVt1YgvchJ11RA1QzWncjgZXVPyTkvKFTzuY/edit?pli=1#gid=0
marilyn Cade:Also, do review the summary from the Chairs as a backgrounder and the Non Paper. I would summarize that there are 5-6 key issues to look at from the governments.
judith hellerstein 2:I agree with Marilyn. I think @nigel you are correct, This would be great idea, but not sure we have the bandwidth.
Gary Hunt - UK Government:I have to leave now... looking forward to the notes of the meeting... Many thanks all!
marilyn Cade:I look forward to participating remotely in the sessions if
Bill Drake:Sinapore better in all respects
marilyn Cade:time allows, as I hope to be in NY at the UN Stakeholder consultation.
judith hellerstein 2:The format in Singapore works better
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:@Gary thanks!
Bill Drake:the small group would be Conversation Starters, not Speakers
Bill Drake:someone frames a topic and tosses out a couple points for discussion
Marilia Maciel:A debate that has not appeared in ICANN is sustainable development, although many members in the community have an important role to play in reducing and smartly planning e-waste. We have a unique opportunity to raise it with the cross between Info sociaty and SDGs. But just a thought, I know it may be off the radar of this community :)
judith hellerstein 2:These are good topics and then we could link the SDGs to this
judith hellerstein 2:To frame the issue
Bill Drake:40 minutes on each of the two and then AOB
Bill Drake:or 35 min each and more AOB
Harold Arcos <Internauta Venezuela>:+1 @Mariilia
Bill Drake:and the IGF discussion could go beyond the Brazil program to larger processes and institutional issues, like the advent of intersessional work
Bill Drake:SD could be worked in as a topic in the WSIS conversation
Marilia Maciel:Sure. Agree
marilyn Cade:I must leave, but I support havign a brief segment on substainable development
Bill Drake:need new moderators
nigel hickson:@Marillia - agree; the "technology transfer" mechanisms to be agrred at SDG Summit will be potentially important for ICANN and Interent in general
Bill Drake:F2F!
renata aquino: i'llsorry
Marilia Maciel:Yes
Bill Drake:http://intgovforum.org/cms/wks2015/index.php/proposal/view_public/163
renata aquino:sorry will be leaving and get the notesoops
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:+1 @Bill
Bill Drake:you should update me on that and Cc Nigel who is the submitter and can edit the document
Bill Drake:we were encouraged to do a Roundtable, which the MAG saw as being 15 people
Bill Drake:not sure if chopping it after acceptance is good practice, sort of bait and switch
Marilia Maciel:My apologies, the expert paper is from David Sutter
Marilia Maciel:Linking SDGs and the WSIS review
judith hellerstein 2:can you post the link
Renate De Wulf:Next call will be on Wednesday September 23rd - mid afternoon UTC
Marilia Maciel:I will send to the list, Judith :)
Tom Dale (GAC Secretariat):Thanks to all
Marilia Maciel:Bye all!
Harold Arcos <Internauta Venezuela>:bye all
judith hellerstein 2:bye all
