Joerg Schweiger:Hi, obviously you can't hear me

  Renate De Wulf:sorry, no we cannot

  Renate De Wulf:can you dial in through the adigo bridge

  Joerg Schweiger:will

  Bill Drake:more staff than community

  Keith Drazek:mute phones please

  David Maher (GNSO - RySG:Could you zoom in on the agenda to make it more legible. thnanks

  Evan Leibovitch (At-Large):AAArgh. This has infuriated me from the start. Whoever is using the term "open source" to describe NMI has NO IDEA what "open source" means. This comes across as a gratuitous marketing term without real meaning. STOP IT.

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:I've unsynced the agenda so you should be able to scroll through it

  Greg Shatan (GNSO - CSG/IPC):It is a "warm and fuzzy" term that makes people feel better. (a/k/a "marketing").

  Marilyn Cade:Sorry to be delayed in joining. I was also at the CSTD.

  Bill Drake:the report has issues

  Marilyn Cade:I note that GIPO was announced as moving forward..

  Bill Drake:yup, did a call with them the other day, EC behind it it seems

  Marilyn Cade:The Report has two parts. I think that the mapping was excellent to demonstrate some progress. The part that is subjective is different in my view.

  Marilyn Cade:I am not sure I can be heard, so I will dial in.

  Bill Drake:ICANN staff are responding for ICANN...can the community respond in parallel?

  Marilyn Cade:As a member of the CCWG EC, from business, I can comment, as soon as I dial in.

  Marilyn Cade:No, ICANN participated as a member of the Tech Community,but also ICANN was mentioned specifically.

  Marilyn Cade:I will try tofind the dial in informatinon.

  Renate De Wulf:ADIGO NUMBERS: http://www.adigo.com/icann/  ADIGO PARTICIPANT CODE: 21612

  Renate De Wulf:Marilyn, if you wish Adigo to dial you in, please give me your number

  Keith Drazek:please ask everyone to mute phones and computers

  Marilyn Cade:I am on mute

  Marilyn Cade:I am on line, but muted.

  Bill Drake:Is Stephen Hawking speaking?

  Keith Drazek:are others getting the choppy audio?

  Marilyn Cade:but now, I cannot understand Oliver

  Marilyn Cade:Yes, choppy, cannot understand

  nigel hickson:Olivier - a problem did not get last stuff?

  Bill Drake:dial back in Olivier

  Keith Drazek:Olivier you need to dial back in.

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:can you dial me out again?

  Keith Drazek:everyone else appears to be ok

  David Maher (GNSO - RySG):+1

  Marilyn Cade:This is ICANN staff response, right, not ICANN community response. I appreciate seeing it, and I will check with the business reps to see if I can post our comments also as informational input.

  David Maher (GNSO - RySG):Is none of the above an option?

  Marilyn Cade:The overall issue is Internet Governance, but we might want to have a preliminary list also, it is probably not ITU PP, anymore, but ITU Internet related activities and resoultions

  Keith Drazek:we're really having some technical issues today...

  Marilyn Cade:Ididn

  Marilyn Cade:I just disconnected, but will try mike on ipad now... and see if it works.

  Marilyn Cade:WSIS +10 and CSTD do take some in depth focus. I am active on both, as is Nigel... perhaps we try to identify some experts per each topic...

  Marilyn Cade:Bill,Avri, are both active in some of these spaces,as well.

  Marilyn Cade:I second Evan's comments as ICANN needing to focus, but I also think that we need to understand what ICANN

  Marilyn Cade:should be doing, but where is the community of ICANN in 'our' views, as first step.... Understanding the IG world has to be done from a core understanding first of ICANN, of ICANN's role in a larger ecosystem

  Bill Drake:Sorry Olivier, very multitasked at the moment

  Bill Drake:sorry which item are we on?

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:#4 - Discussion of themes of work for the CCWG-IG

  Marilyn Cade:We did a good contribution to the NM as I recall, working as a CCWG IG, and holding a sort of town hall.

  Marilyn Cade:I think that we should recall why we started this group.

  Bill Drake:temperature of the room is [WCIT]*

  Marilyn Cade:my mike does not seem to be working.

  Renate De Wulf:please give me your phone number and Adigo will dial you in

  Marilyn Cade:1 202 360 1196

  Renate De Wulf:Marilyn, I passed it on to Adigo

  Marilyn Cade:I think that we need to continue to be subject matter experts within this cCWG. but also ICANN might want to actually engage with the CCWG before launching forth. :-)

  Evan Leibovitch (At-Large):+1 MC

  Marilyn Cade:I am on the call but you cannot hear me, it seems.

  Evan Leibovitch (At-Large):I just heard you enter the call.

  Renate De Wulf:I just heard your name

  Evan Leibovitch (At-Large):try again?

  Bill Drake:if you define holiday as working 60 hour weeks, yes

  nigel hickson:For PP-14 we did discuss prerparation with different Commnuity Groups

  Bill Drake:yesterday I read the session description for a meeting I'm speaking at that described ICANN as the governor of the Internet....

  Bill Drake:maybe defining the boundaries would also be a useful thing to do

  Marilia Maciel:Seems like a good summary, Olivier.

  Marilyn Cade:BUT the outputs of the ITU PP remain important... such as ITU Council working Group on WSIS and IPP..

  Marilia Maciel:Sure. Happy to.

  nigel hickson:@MC - yes and when we have the "open stakholder" meeting for ITU CWG we should ccordinate closely

  Bill Drake:ITU Internet Party I'll be attending too

  Bill Drake:ok

  Marilyn Cade:Bill - you are joining the ITU Council WGs?

  Evan Leibovitch (At-Large):"Governance SWOT" :-)

  nigel hickson:Happy to help where can; UNESCO is covering many IG issues; happy to join a Call 

  Alex Dans:I'll be happy to work with you Marilyn!

  Alex Dans:Yes! :)

  Bill Drake:MC: yes

  Marilyn Cade:My preference is that we organize and staff supports us.

  Bill Drake:absolutely want to move away from Updates and Briefings

  Bill Drake:Absolutely Nigel

  Bill Drake:brief boot up introduction of topic and then open moderated discussion

  Bill Drake:no more than 4 people "on stage" to T things up

  Bill Drake:I don't care if it's two or four topics

  Bill Drake:Again I'd de-emphasize pure 'updates'

  nigel hickson:Re NMI agree with Bill; discussion not confronation; difficult to commit senior staff at this stage  

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:ok Nigel - but the idea behind having two points of views was to generate dialogue. If everyone agrees with everyone then it's hard to conduct any kind of dialogue

  Bill Drake:I think differing points of views will be stated and clash anyway

  Bill Drake:don't need to elevate that dynamic at the start

  Bill Drake:I am sold, two topics

  Evan Leibovitch (At-Large):OK with me

  Evan Leibovitch (At-Large):Good. In fact there are some who believe there is overlap between IGF and NMI :-)

  Bill Drake:terrible

  Bill Drake:maybe week of Jan. 5?

  Bill Drake:doodle

  Bill Drake:the next week a bunch of us are in DC for a meeting

  Bill Drake:Noncontracted Parties House

  Bill Drake:so NCSG and business

  Evan Leibovitch (At-Large):Thanks, Oliviwer. Bye!

  Bill Drake:thansk

  • No labels