Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Agenda can be found on:
https://community.icann.org/x/swquAg
Leon Sanchez:no audio on AC again?
Eric Evrard:I see no Adigo bridge linked to this Adobe Connect room.
Avri Doria:Seems like one of those times when we need to use adigo to hear
the call.
Alexandra Dans:Adigo bridge ID: 21612
Renate De Wulf:apologies for not having audio in the AC room - we are
working on it and will have it for the next call
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:WEF = World Economic Forum
Leon Sanchez:thanks Renate
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:@Renate: yes the two need to be linked together
somehow.
Renate De Wulf:@Olivier: yes, it will be sorted out for the next call
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Thank you!
Marilyn Cade - CSG:Renate, for some reason, I can't raise my hand for the
queue. Can you add me?
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:sure
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:you'll be after Keith
Bill Drake:there's a potential here to be out of synch with the UN CSTD
Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation, which is "officially" taking up
"orphan" issues and "new mechanisms" issues and will issue a report to the UN
etc. Marilyn and Avri are on it and can say more...
Marilyn Cade - CSG:I agree with Bill. I think that the decisional nature of
this meeting, versus feeding into other present activities, is a critical
issue and concern.
Bill Drake:panels 4/5 sort of split internal/external to ICANN
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Question to everyone: a CCWG that "organises" ICANN
input into various fora.... Is this possible?
Bill Drake:Facilitates?
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:I don't know if any CCWG has ever been created that
does this sort of thing... Usually CCWG have a document to produce & then end.
Marilyn Cade - CSG:I think that some input about ICANN's goals and
activities possible to discuss and important to keep strong awareness about
any ICANN directions. There may be two challenges: not everyone is 'expert' in
some of the topics/issues taken up in other fora.
Bill Drake:OCL this is why I once asked if a formal CCWG framework was
necessarily the best configuration for what needs to be done
Bill Drake:Raising awareness, facilitating engagement and inputs from
stakeholders not the usual CCWG deliverable, obviously...
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:butr this is doable. I'm told the ccNSO's SOP WG does
it
Marilyn Cade - CSG:Just a thought about pre events - for business is tough
to ask people to travel so much earlier. Perhaps the CCWG can discuss
practical issues about that issue,.
Bill Drake:Marilyn we recognize that coming one day early is an issue for
some people, not much we can do about it other than make sure people know well
in advance about the date. We certainly can't fit an intensive discussion of
SP agenda into the ICANN week itself
Marilyn Cade - CSG:I think that each of the sub organizations within ICANN
will have their individual consultations. Facilitating and encouraging deeper
engagement within ICANN's sub groups is an obvious responsibility for each of
our own entities.
Bill Drake:MC: sure, and the conference of course doesn't in any way
conflict with sub-orgs' internal processes, it just provides an opportunity
for them to bring the results to the larger community. And of course there may
be others during the week.
Marilyn Cade - CSG:Sorry, closing sentence to that post is: providing a sort
of set of principles to ICANN about its role/its activities may be possible,
via the work of all of us back with our internal ICANN communities.
Bill Drake:21 March event is obviously entirely optional, groups can engage
as much or as little as they want
Oliver Sueme:I have to leave for another meeting, bye everyone.
Philip Corwin:Speaking of expense, who is going to fund those asked to go to
SP to represent various constituencies?
Avri Doria:/1net list is so muc better. some rrreal discussions are going
on on that list. it is a good list in my view.
sally costerton:If it is useful I can share plans for sharing input on the
web
Bill Drake:I actually think the 1Net list is uniquely multistakeholder, so
there's some overlap but it's different
sally costerton:I mean input/submissions for the conference
sally costerton:that is a really good idea.
Avri Doria:for me: wsis+igf+wgec+ietf
Avri Doria:Yeah, art is the only one in the group doing any work on the
charter.
Avri Doria:yeah, Bart ...
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:can you scroll around the document?
Bill Drake:Alternative 2 would be hard pressed to produce any outputs in
time...
Leon Sanchez:@OCL no. no scroll
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:how about now?
Keith Davidson:Yes thabks Olivier
Leon Sanchez:@OCL now it works
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:sorry -- I never kjnow which toggle lets people
scroll and which does not
Keith Davidson:Bill - in time for what? I think in the longer IG framwork,
Alternative 2 provides a more powerful vehicle for the SO/AC communities
Bill Drake:Keith: it's just a question of does the group want to have any
sort of collective response to inputs from others or own ideas prior to SP,
much less the 1 March deadline.
Bill Drake:If not the concern then sure a more fully vetted slow burn
focusing on long term is fine
Keith Davidson:Good points Bill
Avri Doria:i prefer Alt 1, but can live with Alt 2.
Bill Drake:If we're responding broadly to principles or mechanisms
components of SP agenda then flexibility fine
Bill Drake:anything more specific may be a different matter
Keith Davidson:True - you've convinced me to support option 1
Bill Drake:As Woody Allen says, 80% of life is just showing up, it'd be good
for the community to say something...
Bill Drake:Italics on "something"
Leon Sanchez:bye
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:bye everyone. Thanks!
Bill Drake:merci
Keith Davidson:Thanks Olivier
