Terri Agnew:Welcome to the At-Large Review Working Party and ITEMS call held on Wednesday, 07 September 2016 at 20:30 UTC
Terri Agnew:agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/1hmsAw
McTim:morning ladies
Holly Raiche:Morning all
Glenn McKnight:excuse me McTim
VANDA:holiday today here
VANDA:hi all !!!
VANDA:afternoon here...
Heidi Ullrich:Hi All!
VANDA:the para olimpics overture will start in 45 minutes....
VANDA:well... I am the lluck one normally my calls are in the middle of the day...
VANDA:i do not know .. haven't heard ....
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):I am muted now
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):xo not me
Holly Raiche:@ Vanda - how do you do it
VANDA:do what holly?
McTim:The AFRALO call finished over an hour ago, i was on it
John Laprise:Hi all...will be here only for 30 mins.
VANDA:lots of noise....
McTim:lots
Maureen Hilyard:@Alan.. thats what is sounds like!
Alan Greenberg:I strive for accuracy!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):OR Terri cn mute the noisy line
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Hi Nic
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Nick sorry to short without the k
Holly Raiche:There is still noice
Alan Greenberg:QUite spectacular background noises!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Terri can mute them when she tracks the lines down
VANDA:hi Rosa, hi Nick!!!!
Ariel Liang:survey draft as distributed by Lars earlier: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bw3YcL5IANGT7Z4abIdQ6Dz08Jp4Y_pdGp4h5sQRz7o/edit
Aída Noblia:Hi all
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Hi Aida
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Thanks for sorting the line noise out Terri *hug*
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Hi Tom loud nd clear
VANDA:hi Aida - como estas?
Maureen Hilyard:I se lots of multiple choice which would take up space for each question..
Maureen Hilyard:So it wouldn't take long to fill 26 pages
John Laprise:Is there a reason for not using something like a standard (and unifrom) 5 point likert scale for the preference questions. I also noted that in places the language is not symmetric across the the choices.
Terri Agnew:everyone can scroll themselves
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Does Tom want to take us through with him in control rther thsn us having to be told what page to go to> OR someone needs to tell us wjat page to scroll to
John Laprise:for instance 2.3.2: strongly agree; somewhat agree; somewhat disagree; strongly disagree
Terri Agnew:Welcome Le-Marie Thompson
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Question noted John
Ariel Liang:the structure of the survey that Tom is explaining is on page 2 of the google doc
John Laprise:I'd actually add an "agree" and "disagree" to make it six point
John Laprise:example of answer asymmetry: 2.3.5: excellent, good, poor, terrible (?)
John Laprise:1.1.8: no "somewhat active"? it goes from moderate to inactive
Lars Hoffmann:@john.
Lars Hoffmann:could you hold your comments on the doucment until after the call and maybe add the diretly to the google doc? that would make it much easier for all to make sure nothing is overlooked
John Laprise:1.1.9 what if someone is holding a position presently and in the past
John Laprise:sorry lars...unfortunately I'm on the call for 30 mins only :(
Lars Hoffmann:you can comment all day today/tomorrow on the online doc
John Laprise:I'll hold
Lars Hoffmann:if that does not work for you, john ,please do comment here. it would just be much easier for ITEMS as i said
Holly Raiche:@ Lars - and everyone. I"m hpayy to have comments in the chat - they are recorded and can be addressed. If there is time after Tom's presentation, thre can be a response, but if not, we will have a record that the ITEMS team will have and will consider. So as long as people are happy not to have a response to the chat immediately, it's a good recordof responses
John Laprise:Will do...I'll comment in the doc
Holly Raiche:@ John - and yes comment in the document as well
John Laprise:OK holly, I'll do both :)
John Laprise:3.6: language should use regular terminology e.g. fluent, native speaker...
Ariel Liang:The online survey tool: https://goo.gl/forms/DXpqPjsf9LkFAa7i2
Ariel Liang:Please feel free to play with it
John Laprise:3.3: low, middle, high income will not tell us much in a global frame
VANDA:I agree with John on language. misinterpretation is common in not native trasnlations. I am doing some surveys in LAC region and I am feeling the problem and I am doing direct calls , so have chance to make it clearer to the intervewer
John Laprise:3.2: transgendered?
John Laprise:2.3.8 perhaps ranking the items in order of importance?
Terri Agnew:Welcome Tijani Ben Jemaa
John Laprise:Sorry all must run: I'll add to the doc inline later.
Holly Raiche:Ariel - what about having a wiki so that everyone can put any further commentson it - and see what othershave said. And then send a link to the whole WP to the llink?
Aída Noblia:Bien Vanda y tú?
Holly Raiche:Thanks John
Heidi Ullrich:@Holly, I believe the idea is for the Members of the WP to comment directly on the Google doc. The list is above
VANDA:ok will do so., at Doc itself.
Lars Hoffmann:@holly - i think a wiki seems too much and inefficient.
Maureen Hilyard:I think it would be more convenient for the ITEMS team to have them on the doc itself - as John is going to do which will be quite helpful I think
Heidi Ullrich:Making comments in the chat and on a wiki page will be extra work for staff and ITEMs.
Holly Raiche:@Heidi - okay. But if peoplee have trouble with the doc - as Alan did. (but realise comments shouldn't be all over the place
Lars Hoffmann:comments can be made directly on the google doc or here in the chat. with a strong prefercne for the former
Holly Raiche:Thanks Lars
Heidi Ullrich:The new version includes clear instructions on how to make comments.
Heidi Ullrich:Including clicking on 'comment' once you have finished your remark.
Holly Raiche:@ Heidi - rue enough - but some people's connection can be flaky....
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Please confir what page Tom is on
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):herr we are does not help id WE have scroll contol
Aída Noblia:16
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):2.2.5 is on page 19
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Time ceck Tom, can I urge you to be *very* concise and "high level" please
Holly Raiche:Just a suggestion - for quection 2.3.1 - maybe have people number the options from 1 to whatever
Glenn McKnight:I noticed two questions on the 2008 review recommendations, Perhaps add a link to the recommendations. If you don't know the results of the previous review you can't answer these questions
VANDA:those persons are faily distributed around the owrld?
Maureen Hilyard:@Cheryl and similarly for the question on the Summit I in Mexico - re recommendations
Maureen Hilyard:and Summit II in London
McTim:sure that would be better
Aída Noblia:No tengo claro si nosotros respondemos las preguntas o si debemos circular la encuesta a otras personas
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Agree Maureen
VANDA:Aida. si nossotros respondemos y puede ser bueno, se posible discutir con los demas adentro de nuestras ALSs
Aída Noblia:gracias Vanda, cada uno en su ALS. Gracias
VANDA:Aida. claro que debemso incentivar todos en nuestra region que respondan a la survey
Rosa Delgado:Concerning the survey translations, are we going (review team) to have the time to revise translations (FR,SP)?
Lars Hoffmann:@rosa - transliation will be done by icann translation services. so no need to revise translations. as long as the english is finite.
Aída Noblia:el plazo para que respondn las ALS de la región es bastante corto
VANDA:Rosa understood that will not be in protuguese, right? i do not beleive all ALS here needed anyway
Rosa Delgado:Are we lauching the survey in several languages?
VANDA:have nice time all
Lars Hoffmann:@rosa - no the non-english version will be launched about 2-3 days later.
VANDA:gracais!
Aída Noblia:Buenos días tardes buenas noches a todos- gracias
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Bye all