Instructions:

  1. Please use the <Edit Contents> menu option (directly above) to complete this form. Remember to <Save> the page (bottom right) after making updates.
  2. Multiple travelers are asked to collaborate as a team in pulling together the appropriate information.
  3. Some information fields are 'richtext' so that they can accommodate tables, links, images, attachments, and other formatting capabilities that may be useful in explaining/describing this proposal.
  4. This form may be edited/saved as many times as needed. When completed, please notify your Program Coordinator (PC) for further processing.

Trip Proposals must be approved within the Organization/Structure and Regional GSE Team at least six (6) weeks before the event start date.
Questions about this program should be directed to: CROP Staff.

Person Completing Form
Name:


Maryam Bakoshi

Date:


06-Mar-2018

STAFF USE ONLY
Application
Status 
Assessment
Due-Date 


APPROVED

09-Jun-2018

Trip Proposal Section

LINK TO TRIP ASSESSMENT : NCUC Trip Assessment 3 DRAFT

1) Number of Travelers:
(Note: Each traveler uses one trip of the total number
allocated to each organization/structure).  

1

2) Traveler Contact Information and Itinerary:

TravelerEmailFrom
City
From
Country
Depart
Date
Return
Date
Michael Karanicolas mkaranicolas@gmail.comHalifaxCanada15-May-201818-May-2018
3) Special Travel Circumstances, Arrangements,
Explanations, or Notations: 
(Please identify each traveler, as applicable)
4) Event/Conference Name, Title, or Descriptor:RightsCon
5) Event/Conference Dates:
Start:16-May-2018End:18-May-2018
6) Event/Conference Website Link:https://www.rightscon.org
7) Primary Event/Conference Location:
Street
Address:
Beanfield Centre at Exhibition Place, 105 Princes' Blvd, M6K 3C3
City:TorontoCountry:Canada

8) Indicate whether it is a regional trip OR an out-of-region trip.


Regional
9) ICANN Global Stakeholder Engagement Region:North America

10) Activity Sponsors:
(Note: all event sponsors must be identified
in order to comply with ICANN travel guidelines).


SIDA

Google 

IDRC CRDI

Humanity United

Microsoft 

Vodafone

11) Proposed Goals and Outcomes:

Content Guidelines (click here)

Fundamentally, ICANN’s structure means that the organization and processes are far more susceptible to impact than, say, a governmental regulatory strategy. This type of session, involving senior ICANN staff as well as representatives from different stakeholder groups, can have a real and direct impact on policy, particularly if it taps into ongoing questions that the organization faces.

More broadly, we want to bring this discussion to RightsCon in order to engage with members of the digital rights community who have not, thus far, been directly involved with ICANN. Non-commercial voices at ICANN, and in particular those who work to promote digital rights, are dependent on a broad base of community support to share the workload and spread the word about the importance of decisions taking place in ICANN. As a consequence, we see this very much as an outreach session, in addition to being a forum for substantive debate on stakeholder representation and balancing out views from a very diverse and multicultural community. 

12) Additional Information (optional):


Please describe what you want to do in your session

What is the session about? What activities or discussions do you have planned? How will your time be structured? How will you promote interactivity? What is the session's agenda and how will it be facilitated? Please be as detailed as possible! Your answer


ICANN’s model of Internet governance is built on the idea of multistakeholderism: that voices from the commercial, non-commercial and technical communities all have a seat at the table and share an equal role in policymaking. But systems that are designed to be egalitarian can nonetheless manifest biases in practice. In ICANN’s case, although the IANA transition has already taken place, uncertainty persists over where governments’ role in the process ends and ICANN’s begins, allowing the former to wield a powerful stick over the process. Meanwhile, human rights advocates and other non-commercial interests, who in theory engage on an equal footing with their counterparts from the business community, can be placed at a natural disadvantage by the fact that they generally have fewer resources to work with. In working groups that operate on consensus, it is not unusual to see one or two part-time activists struggling to hold the line against a dozen or more full-time lobbyists.


What does this mean for the multistakeholder process going forward, and are there better ways for ICANN to hold the ring between these different interest groups? This session will involve a roundtable discussion between individuals from ICANN’s different communities to explore their thoughts on the current balance, and discuss how the playing field should be organized to ensure that all voices have a say.


The session will begin with a brief introduction by Theresa Swinehart, ICANN’s Senior Vice President, Multistakeholder Strategy And Strategic Initiatives, who will share her thoughts on the challenges in establishing the current model, its strengths and weaknesses. From there, Jeremy Malcolm of the Electronic Frontiers Foundation, Collin Kurre of Article 19, and Anriette Esterhuysen will share their experiences and thoughts about the multistakeholder model, in particular through their engagement with working groups on ICANN’s rights protection mechanisms, on promoting human rights at ICANN, and on ICANN nominations, respectively. The session will then hear brief responses from representatives from the business constituency and the government constituency, before moving into a more free-flowing discussion among first the participants, and then among the participants and the audience. The session will be moderated by Michael Karanicolas, of ICANN’s Non-Commercial Users’ Constituency.


Who will be joining you in this session? Have you confirmed their participation? Who will be moderating this session? *

Jeremy Malcolm (Australian, M), Senior Global Policy Analyst at Electronic Frontier Foundation (confirmed)

Collin Kurre (American, F), Digital Programme, Article 19 (confirmed)

Michael Karanicolas, (Canadian, M), Non-commercial Stakeholders’ Group, ICANN, President, Right to Know Coalition (confirmed)

Theresa Swinehart (American, F), Senior Vice President, Multistakeholder Strategy And Strategic Initiatives, ICANN

Anriette Esterhuysen (South African, F), Nominations Committee, ICANN, formerly Executive Director of the Association for Progressive Communications (confirmed)

Susan Kawaguchi (American, F), Facebook representative to ICANN (TBC)

Benedicto Fonseca (Brazilian, F), Brazilian government representative to ICANN (TBC)


What outcomes would you like to achieve with your session, and how will you transition these activities into post-conference action? *

We want to make sure that the work happening at RightsCon continues. Tell us what you think your session would accomplish, and any initial ideas to further your work after the session concludes.


Fundamentally, ICANN’s structure means that the organization and processes are far more susceptible to impact than, say, a governmental regulatory strategy. This type of session, involving senior ICANN staff as well as representatives from different stakeholder groups, can have a real and direct impact on policy, particularly if it taps into ongoing questions that the organization faces.


More broadly, we want to bring this discussion to RightsCon in order to engage with members of the digital rights community who have not, thus far, been directly involved with ICANN. Non-commercial voices at ICANN, and in particular those who work to promote digital rights, are dependent on a broad base of community support to share the workload and spread the word about the importance of decisions taking place in ICANN. As a consequence, we see this very much as an outreach session, in addition to being a forum for substantive debate on stakeholder representation and balancing out views from a very diverse and multicultural community.


How long would you like this session to last? *


60 minutes

RightsCon Booth Proposal: NCUC


Tell us what you want to show off.


As one of the world’s key Internet governance organizations, ICANN operates according to a unique multistakeholder model of bottom-up policymaking. Within this ecosystem, non-commercial users, including civil society organizations and individuals, are represented by the Non-commercial Users Constituency (NCUC). With real voting power in ICANN’s policy making and Board selection, the NCUC develops and supports positions that favour non-commercial communication and activity on the Internet.


However, although ICANN is designed as a relatively egalitarian multistakeholder process, non-commercial interests are at a natural disadvantage in terms of resources as compared to constituencies representing business and commercial interests. Instead, we rely on people power, and the support of the broader Internet community, whose interests we seek to promote.


Outreach is key to carrying out this mission effectively, and we want to have a booth in order to try and engage with RightsCon attendees to expand NCUC membership, and bring more civil society voices into the ICANN ecosystem. The NCUC is the conscience of ICANN, a voice for freedom of expression, privacy, and egalitarianism on the Internet. Our message is fundamentally the message of the global digital rights community – join us in advocating for an Internet governance structure that suits the needs of everyone.

_______________________________________________________________ 
Acknowledgements Section

Note: The first three elements below should be completed by a Program Coordinator (PC) designated by this organization/structure.

AcknowledgementsConfirmed?NameDateNotes
The participants identified in this application agree to abide by the terms and conditions of this FY18 Community Regional Outreach Program (CROP) as outlined on the CROP Procedures & Guidelines page. YesMaryam Bakoshi06-Mar-2018
The ICANN Organization / Structure's leadership has authorized the submission of this Trip Proposal.YesMaryam Bakoshi06-Mar-2018
The ICANN Stakeholder Engagement Vice-President has concurred that the Proposed Goals/Outcomes of this Trip Proposal are consistent with operational plans and/or strategies.YesMaryam Bakoshi07-Mar-2018Concurred by Chris Mondini
The CROP Staff Administrators confirm that this trip satisfies the program's terms, guidelines, and policies.YesMaryam Bakoshi06-Mar-2018
  =======================================================
Program Administration: STAFF USE ONLY

Approved Travel Elements:

TravelerApproved
Arrival Date
Approved
Departure Date
Approved Fees 
Michael Karanicolas 15-May-201818-May-2018


Airfare
Hotel/Lodging
Per Diem

Staff Department Notifications:

Program RequirementDate Satisfied/ConfirmedInitialsNotes
Program Criteria Satisfied07-Mar-2018
MB
Constituency Travel Notified08-Mar-2018
MB
Travel Booking Initiated with Attendees09-Mar-2018
JDJ
Welcome email sent
Travel Booking Completed/Confirmed20-Mar-2018

Program Admin Transfers from Community Drafts to Approved Forms:

Trip Proposal08-Mar-2018Trip Assessment


CROP Trip Proposal Template (May 2017)

For questions, comments, suggestions, or technical support concerning this space, please email: CROP Staff
© 2017 Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers