The next RPM TMCH sub team will be held on Friday, 12 August 2016 at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes.
08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 16:00 London, 17:00 CEST
For other times: http://tinyurl.com/j4xj9kc
PROPOSED AGENDA: RPM TMCH sub team will be held on Friday, 12 August 2016 at 15:00 UTC meeting.
- Roll call/updates to SOI;
- Discussion of next steps arising from initial report to full Working Group;
- Update from staff regarding data source review;
- Discussion of data-related questions; and
- Next steps/next meeting.
On #2, for further background, please refer to the Sub Team’s initial report on the Working Group wiki space: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61605051/TMCH%20Sub%20Team%20Initial%20Report%20-%20Susan%20Payne%20edit%20-%209%20Aug.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1470845690000&api=v2.
On #4, the following questions were already proposed by Kristine Dorrain:
- Can we find out what the TMCH’s FAQ were? Not necessarily what made it to the website but from a CS perspective, what questions did they get the most?
- For brand owners who didn’t put their marks in the TMCH
- Why didn’t they?
- What would encourage them to participate, if anything?
- For brand owners who did put their marks in the TMCH:
- Would they do it again, why or why not?
- Was the value acceptable (good cost/benefit ratio)
- For registrars, what is the rate of cart abandonment for new gTLDs when exposed to a TM Claims notice vs after the Claims period and how do those numbers compare to TLDs?
- Are registrants confused with presented with Claims Notices (this could start with a simple Google search to find random rants, but I’m not sure how to poll “the internet” because if a registrant has a relationship with a registrar such that they’d call the registrar and ask, they are probably sophisticated enough to know what’s going on – but maybe not).
FOLLOW UP:
Transcript
Apologies: Phil Corwin, Grace Mutung'u, Robin Gross