You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Instructions:

  1. Please use the <Edit Contents> menu option (directly above) to complete this form. Remember to <Save> the page (bottom right) after making updates.
  2. Travelers are asked to collaborate as a team in pulling together the appropriate information.
  3. This Trip/Event Assessment form will be automatically associated with its related Proposal; therefore, no duplicate traveler identification information is required.
  4. The information fields are 'richtext' so that they can accommodate tables, links, images, attachments, and other formatting capabilities that may be useful in explaining/describing the Trip/Event.
  5. This form may be edited/saved as many times as needed. When completed, please notify your Pilot Program Coordinator (PPC) for further processing.
STAFF USE ONLY
Assessment
Status 
Form ID#
PENDING

NPOC03

Trip/Event Assessments should be completed within three (3) weeks of the traveler's return date.

Trip/Event Assessment Form

LINK:  NPOC Trip Proposal 3

1) Describe the Trip/Event in sufficient detail
that an interested reader could understand Who,
What, When, Where, and Why concerning this
funded CROPP activity (please be as expansive
as possible):  

ICANN59: Jo’burg on the scale

Getting to be part of the 59th public meeting of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) with emphasize on the public forum was an opportunity to cherish, courtesy of the Non-Profit  Concern Constituency (NPOC), especially having missed out soon after at the recently concluded 4th Intersessional Meeting in Reykjavik, Iceland, last February due to visa-related issues.

For those who attended the ICANN47 in Durban in 2013, the city of Johannesburg, another city in South Africa is on the scale.

Arriving in the early hours of Sunday, June 25 at the Garden Court, Sandon City, the first thing that came to mind was to visualize mentally how the crowd would look like at ICANN59, hence I have to head to the Sandton Convention Centre for registration, soon after. It took less than 10 minutes to complete, mostly if you have pre-registered, it takes much less time.

The process left one amazed as ICANN has its registration points to accommodate estimated 12 or more participants at a row.

After the registration was completed, it is now time to look at the schedules with particular interest on what programmes are there for NPOC and its related sisters in the Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG) and Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC).

2) Explain the extent to which the Proposed
Goals and Outcomes were accomplished
(see above LINK to review the original Proposal):  

This is multistakeholder, open doors:

On Monday, June 26, it was time to grace the opening plenary session as ICANN59 doors were officially thrown up to participants from across the world and especially for yours sincerely which saw top on agenda, the Generic Name Supporting Organisation (GNSO) - Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) Outreach and Strategy Meeting under the chairmanship of Tapani Tarvainen and led in session by  NCSG Policy Committee chair, Rafik Dammak; to prepare for the day's schedule and weigh sessions by way of providing some insights on what to expect and where they are happening. His preamble captured it succinctly "today is the first official first day of the ICANN meeting or the policy forum" with first involvement of NCSG being a session as part of the GNSO, which took better part of the day as it ran between 9am till 3pm at the Ballroom 2 (GNSO).

This witnessed several updates from different working groups and meeting with the board among others, consequently he advised all to attend that session, so as to get a snapshot of several discussions and topics from the different working groups.

This also formed a ritual through the days of ICANN59 and must be commended as useful in addition to daily meetings of NPOC and affiliated committees especially the Charter Review working group among others.

This also fulfilled to a large extent the needed interactions and synergy to continue the Charter Review works online with understanding of the perception or thinking of most of the members and need for continuous collaborations.

Crocker to AFRALO:

Very early in the day 1 of ICANN59 was the hosting of of the members of the University of Johannesburg alongside the over 43 members of the At-Large Structures (ALSes) to its General Assembly by  the Africa Regional At-Large Organisation (AFRALO).

In his address to the session, the ICANN chairman, Board of Directors, Dr. Steve Crocker, explained that the development of the Internet has remained opened since its evolution began, stressing that as a long-standing member of the Internet development, described the Internet evolution as a bit complicated and complex especially for the novice.

He noted at the At-Large AFRALO Local Community Engagement held in Bill Gallagher Room, that with the ICANN community there are sets of people who daily contribute to the development of the Internet and how it works from the African region, including the AFRINIC, and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group who are always trying to ensure balance. Pointing out that one of the unique aspects of the internet development from onset has remained open unlike the development of telephone. Thus, the openness, he said, has helped the Internet to evolve to the most adoptable need of the people, end-users and society at large.

 

Winners of Multistakeholder Ethos emerge:

Subsequently unique among others was the unveiling of the two winners of the ICANN’s 2017 Multistakeholder Ethos Awards, Japanese Hiro Hotta and Chilean Patricio Poblete at the Level 4 Foyer.

The awards launched in 2014 at ICANN50 in London, the Multistakeholder Ethos Award recognizes ICANN participants who have invested in consensus-based solutions, acknowledged the importance of ICANN’s multistakeholder model of Internet governance and contributed in a substantive way to the higher interests of ICANN’s organization and community with recipients selected annually by a panel of community members representing the various Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees.

And this year, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) community evaluation panel recognized these two long-time members of the community who have made outstanding contributions to ICANN's multistakeholder model of Internet governance. While Hiro Hotta and Patricio Poblete were selected from a list of 14 nominees as those who best demonstrate the spirit of collaboration, strongly promoting consensus and proven commitment to ICANN's multistakeholder model through decades of active participation and dedication.

The panel stated that each recipient met the award criteria in distinctive ways and recognizes them for the examples they set in supporting and encouraging ICANN's multistakeholder model in their respective regions, therefore have no reservation in awarding both.

3) Additional information pertaining
to this outreach Trip/Event (optional):

NPOC Constituency Day:

One of the exciting moments was the hosting of the Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) at Committee Room 4, which happens to be the home for Not-for-Profit organizations like NGOs as far as ICANN59 is concerned and for those wishing to have a voice in internet governance.

The imperativeness of this NPOC Constituency Day is that it resonates very well with my recent election as the Vice President of the African Civil Society on the Information Society (ACSIS) and as the Lead Strategist at DigitalSENSE Africa Media; whereas ACSIS is an over 175-member continental organization focusing on promoting inclusive Information Society on African continent, Internet Governance; DigitalSENSE Africa Media prides itself with the convention of the annual DigitalSENSE Africa forum on Internet Goverannce for Development (IG4D) and Nigeria IPv6 Roundtable.

Therefore, it was extremely exciting to have the incoming chairperson, Joan Kerr led this session with a lot of nostaligia. From the welcome and general introduction of those around the room to remarks on the essence of the day and NPOC by the chairperson to presentation by the likes of Agustina Callegari taking on "Onboarding Programme" for new NPOC members to the 'Update on the work of the GNSO Council' by Martin Silva Valent with highlight being the subject surrounding the earlier proposed change of GNSO Council name (Generic Name Supporting Organisation), to Global Name Supporting Organisation), which more or less was seen as matter of semantics and not likely to change anything in the structure of GNSO. As at the last count, the option was reportedly not included in the meeting agenda for ICANN59.

For the Vice President, Global Stakeholders Engagement (GSE) at ICANN, Mr. Adam Peake, there is need for every region to ensure closeness with ICANN lead in their region with regards to Global Stakeholders Engagement, like Pierre Dandijuno, who is the Vice President for Africa on Stakeholder Engagement. He encouraged NPOC and its members to be courageous in coming up with proposals they think should be on the table with ICANN leadership, stressing the importance of having relationship with the regional heads where projects are likely to take place, as long as the resources and wherewithal depend on what is available of the regional head focus.

He was precise on the Africa Strategy while asking members to explore it and further bridging the gap between their Internet ecosystem and members of the society and end-users alike.

He was accompanied by Mr. Pierre Dandijuno, the Vice President for Africa on Stakeholder Engagement at ICANN among other team-members.

Equally, NPOC Constituency Day, saw Jonathan Zuck-led Consumer Choice, Consumer Trust Review Team in attendance to share what they have done so far with NPOC community, as well as our own Renata Aquino Ribeiro tackling the "Building Community Collaboration" while presentations were made by Raoul Plommer "Trello and other management/collaboration tools" and Juan Manuel Rojas on NPOC proposed website, respectively, with a proposal by yours sincerely to merge the "What  NPOC does and What is NPOC?" into Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to name  a few.

NPOC members were also asked to submit their events to Website Working Group even if it appeared in any Wiki in addition to ensure link back between the website and onboarding progamme pages and vis-a visa, before the Joan gave the closing remarks.

Later that Wednesday evening I joined the Charter Review Working Group only to realise that a lot of work is yet to undone despite the efforts of the committee, of which everyone member was urged to make out time to ensure NPOC have a good Charter that will stand the test of time as we move forwarded and continue the exercise on, even though it takes some six months to get through ICANN leadership vetting which includes public comment.

On the final note:

It is important to extend network and collaboration with organisations on the continent like ACSIS by way of seeing events on the continent like ACSIS forthcoming School of Internet Governance for La Francophone, Digital Summit to name a few to further stimulate the NPOC mandate to the continent of Africa via non-profits in the region among others.

There is need to extend the CROPP facility to last throughout the week of ICANN meetings. I have since returned safely to base in Lagos-Nigeria, with a pledge to remain active in NPOC and supportive for a future NPOC of our dreams.

4) Date Completed:
Acknowledgements Section

Note: To be completed by a Pilot Program Coordinator (PPC) designated by this organization/structure.

AcknowledgementsConfirmed?NameDateNotes
The Trip/Event Assessment information has been gathered and properly entered into this form.YesMaryam Bakoshi21-Jul-2017
The ICANN Organization / Structure's leadership has authorized the submission of this Trip/Event Assessment.YesMaryam Bakoshi24-Jul-2017
The ICANN Stakeholder Engagement Vice-President has concurred that this Trip/Event Assessment satisfactorily reports the extent to which the goals/outcomes outlined in the original proposal have been achieved.YesOzan Sahin11-Sep-2017
  =======================================================


CROPP-FY17 Trip/Event Assessment Template (Jul 2016)

  • No labels
For questions, comments, suggestions, or technical support concerning this space, please email: CROPP Program Staff
© 2016 Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers