The call for the Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in all gTLDs PDP Working Group is scheduled for Wednesday, 06 September 2017 at 17:00 UTC for 90 minute duration.

10:00 PDT, 13:00 EDT, 18:00 London, 19:00 CET

For other times:   http://tinyurl.com/ycy2mt2b 

PROPOSED AGENDA

  1. Roll call (via Adobe Connect and phone bridge only); updates to Statements of Interest
  2. Review draft GNSO Council data collection request (including suggested prioritization levels from the Working Group co-chairs)
  3. Next steps/next meeting

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS


RPM Sunrise & Trademark Claims Metrics Request Form - DRAFT - 5 Sept 2017.docx

List of RPM Data Collection Proposals for Sunrise Trademark Claims with Co-Chairs Priority Designations.docx


RECORDINGS


Mp3

AC Recording

AC Chat

Transcript

Additional Note:


PARTICIPATION


Attendance

Apologies:  Maxim Alzoba, Marie Pattullo, Jonathan Agmon, Michael Graham, Lillian Fosteris 

 

Notes/ Action Items


Action Items:

1. Co-Chairs and staff to update and finalize data request to the GNSO Council

2. Staff to circulate links to the recording and transcripts of the joint call between the leadership teams of the RPMs Review PDP Working Group, the new gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Working Group and the GNSO Council, when they are available

3. Staff to remove the prioritization columns from the Google Doc when it is submitted as part of the data request

4. Staff to move the question about translating the Trademark Claims Notice from the survey of registrants and potential registrants to the survey of registrars

5. Staff to add Sunrise gaming to the task of gathering third-party sources and delete it as a standalone task

6. Staff to replace the words “scope and cost” with “feasibility” in the task regarding development of a system to handle non-exact matches

7. Staff to correct reference under anonymized data from Deloitte from Sunrise to TMCH registration, and clarify that the data should include both undisputed domains as well as domains in dispute

8. Staff to clarify that data collection suggestions on URS also include UDRP disputes

  • No labels