Attendees: 

Sub-group Members:   Avri Doria, David McAuley, Greg Shatan, Kavouss Arasteh, Liz Le, Robin Gross, Samantha Eisner, Sarah McGonigle

Staff:  Bernard Turcotte, Brenda Brewer

Apologies:  /

** If your name is missing from attendance or apology, please send note to acct-staff@icann.org **

Agenda

  1. Admin; SOIs
  2. Repose language for public comment;
  3. Sam/Liz Redline proposal with clarifications;
  4. Elements/Types of Hearings;
  5. AOB.

Transcript

Recording

Raw Caption Notes*

*Note that these are the unofficial transcript. Official transcript will be posted 2-3 days after the call

Decisions:

  • (none)

Action Items:

  • DM – will propose language to answer MH’s concerns regarding the text for the public consultation on rule 4.
  • DM – will publish a draft position on Joinder and Types of Hearings
  • DM – will comment on rule 4 for the interim rules vs ICANN Legal proposal.
  • LL – will publish draft text on Translation

Requests:

  • (none)

Next meeting:

  • Thursday 31 May 1900 UTC
  • Thursday 7 June 1900 UTC
  • Thursday 14 June 1900 UTC

Chat Transcript

13:37:29 From Brenda Brewer : Good day all! Welcome to IRP-IOT Meeting #40 on 24 May 2018 @ 19:00 UTC. Please note, this meeting is recorded. Mute when not speaking. Thank you.

Agenda:

1. Admin; SOIs
2. Repose language for public comment;
3. Sam/Liz Redline proposal with clarifications;
4. Elements/Types of Hearings;
5. AOB


13:57:23 From Bernard : Hello all
13:59:14 From David McAuley : hello all - I will speak at top of hour and see whether we need to wait a few minutes
14:00:55 From David McAuley : was I able to be heard just now
14:01:10 From David McAuley : could I be heard just now
14:01:30 From Bernard : Yes
14:01:34 From David McAuley : Thanks
14:01:35 From Bernard : very clear
14:01:45 From David McAuley : looks good Greg
14:01:57 From David McAuley : a new participant?
14:02:01 From Bernard : very nice Greg
14:02:12 From Avri Doria : ok, thanks
14:02:30 From Greg Shatan : New haircut.
14:02:53 From Bernard : or is that a real Zoom troll
14:03:08 From Greg Shatan : Actually, it’s a patent troll.
14:03:59 From Bernard : we have our 5 technically
14:04:13 From David McAuley : Thanks bernie
14:04:18 From David McAuley : Bernie
14:04:44 From David McAuley : I am having a few Zoom issues myself here - still missing adobe
14:05:40 From Bernard : You are not alone.....
14:06:56 From Avri Doria : i have been back in adobe for a few meetings, and it still has the same old audio dficulties at times. we will get back to hating it in no time.
14:07:51 From Greg Shatan : I prefer Zoom to WebEx, at least on tablet. However, Zoom’s strong suit is video meetings, which is wasted on the ICANN implementation (troll cameos notwithstanding).
14:09:01 From Robin : what is the purpose of the mailing list?
14:10:49 From Bernard : yes
14:11:29 From Bernard : we count ICANN as 1 participant
14:11:47 From Bernard : regrdless of the number of actual numbers
14:12:04 From Bernard : persons not numbers
14:15:04 From elizabeth.le : the purpose of the mailing list is for the SO/ACs who are interested in participating in the establishment of standing panel process.
14:16:11 From Bernard : yes
14:29:21 From Avri Doria : greg got very quiet all of a sudden
14:29:44 From Avri Doria : ok so was me
14:34:26 From Bernard : 55 minutes left in call
14:43:25 From Greg Shatan : The explanation is typically prepared by staff, not the WG or other team.
14:43:50 From Bernard : glad to help
14:44:16 From Avri Doria : quickly is good.
14:45:48 From Avri Doria : agree with Greg
14:46:02 From Avri Doria : let Bernie do it.
14:46:06 From Bernard : Greg is correct
14:46:19 From Arasteh : David,I agree with Greg
14:47:18 From Arasteh : Since there is no objection to the concept of explanatory note ,we leave to the staff
14:59:41 From Bernard : 30 minutes left in call
15:03:38 From Avri Doria : agree with Greg
15:04:02 From Avri Doria : as long as final rule is retroactive to when the first bucket goes out, this seems to work.
15:05:14 From Avri Doria : sounds good
15:05:49 From Avri Doria : Liz's ammendment sounds good.
15:07:10 From Greg Shatan : Liz, what about the retroactivity suggestion?
15:07:55 From elizabeth.le : @David - will do
15:07:57 From Greg Shatan : I support IF AND ONLY IF the retroactivity is in place.
15:10:08 From elizabeth.le : @greg - retroactivity of the final rules to the date of the iterim rules?
15:10:24 From Avri Doria : that seems to make sense
15:13:33 From Greg Shatan : Monday is a holiday.
15:13:45 From Bernard : meeting dates will be reserved
15:14:08 From Bernard : will do
15:14:42 From Bernard : bye all
15:14:42 From Avri Doria : but last monday was a holiday in much of the rest of the worl
15:14:49 From Avri Doria : bye
15:14:54 From elizabeth.le : re retroactivity - no objections to that so long as there wouldn’t be a right to make advantage of the updated rules if there would be prejudice to a proceeding that has been initiated
15:14:54 From Greg Shatan : Thanks all! Bye.

  • No labels