Attendees:
Members: Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Eduardo Diaz, Greg Shatan, Jaap Akkerhuis, Jonathan Robinson, Paul, Kane, Seun Ojediji (7)
Participants: Brenden Kuerbis, Chuck Gomes, Jorge Cancio, Martin Boyle, Matthew Shears, Russ Mundy, Sabine Meyer, Tracy Hackshaw, Wale Bakare (9)
Staff: Grace Abuhamad, Marika Konings, Trang, Nguyen, Brenda Brewer
Apologies: Staffan Jonson, Avri Doria, Lise Fuhr
**Please let Brenda know if your name has been left off the list (attendees or apologies).**
Agenda
1. Opening Remarks
2. Implementation
- CWG Role in Implementation
- DT-O on Budget
- DT-IPR on IANA Intellectual Property
- SLE Update
3. CCWG & ICG
4. Bylaws
- Drafting Update
- Structuring CWG Review
5. AOB
- Upcoming Meeting Schedule
6. Closing Remarks
Notes
Opening Remarks
- Meeting scheduled for every two weeks to ensure it is calendarized - if not necessary, it will be cancelled
- Review starting time of this specific meeting, noting limited attendance for this meeting (could be attendance/travel for the IETF and IGF meetings)
Implementation
- Implementation team at ICANN is headed by Akram Atallah and Trang Nguyen
- CWG Charter is silent on implementation, but it would be logical for the CWG to stay in place to ensure that questions can be answered throughout implementation.
Action: send letter to Chartering Organizations to confirm intended role for CWG in implementation and rationale. "This is our intention.... if not objection,
CWG will proceed..."
Action: send letter to Akram, Trang, and team to formalize the CWG role in implementation
- DT-O is serving as a facilitator for the FY17 Budget process to ensure that CWG recommendations are taken into account in the assumptions related to transition.
- DT-IPR just launched on Tuesday. Staff circulated a chronology of CWG position and development which the DT can use to launch its work.
- SLEs implementation work is ongoing. Implementation team will provide an update on CWG calls moving forward. ICANN has looked at some of the
data and prepared for release, including a formal request to NTIA (required per the Contract).
CCWG & ICG
- CWG should write to Chartering Orgs to confirm that CCWG has met requirements. This would aid the COs for approval process. The steps would be as follows:
- As part of the CCWG public comment, the CWG will indicate whether or not requirements are met.
- After the public comment, the CWG writes to the Chartering Orgs to confirm that requirements have been met
- Then, need for the Chartering Orgs to confirm in their motions on CCWG proposal
Action: devise early communication of this process for confirmation of CCWG dependencies.
Bylaws
- Work is ongoing to draft the CWG Bylaws. These were expected this week, but have not yet been delivered.
- Suggested process: CWG reviews draft, confirms them, submits to ICANN for implementation and copies the CCWG. Subject to no objection from
CCWG chairs, the implementation can proceed.
AOB
- Upcoming meeting schedule to be revised and sent to CWG.
- Consider adding the integration of separation issue as an item for next CWG call.
Closing Remarks
Thank you
Action Items
Action: send letter to Chartering Organizations to confirm intended role for CWG in implementation and rationale. "This is our intention.... if not
objection, CWG will proceed..."
Action: send letter to Akram, Trang, and team to formalize the CWG role in implementation
Action: devise early communication of this process for confirmation of CCWG dependencies.
Transcript
Recordings
- Adobe Connect recording is available here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p9rc3r5lqxh/
- MP3 recording is available here: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-cwg-iana-05nov15-en.mp3
Chat Transcript
Brenda Brewer: (11/5/2015 04:37) Welcome to CWG Stewardship Meeting #70 on 5 November 2015 @ 11:00 UTC!
Martin Boyle, Nominet: (04:56) Hi all
Martin Boyle, Nominet: (04:58) hello Jaap!
Jaap Akkerhuis (SSAC): (04:58) hi all
Sabine Meyer (GAC - Germany): (04:59) hello everyone!
jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland): (05:01) hi all
Matthew Shears: (05:01) hello
Jonathan Robinson: (05:03) Welcome all. We'll commence very shortly.
Greg Shatan: (05:03) Good Morning from New York, where it's 6 am and still dark.
Chuck Gomes (RySG): (05:04) @ Cheryl: No problem on my side.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:04) Thx Chuck
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:04) Been raining ere quite a bit so it may be a bit if water effecting me locally
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:05) 2200 here Zgreg :-)
Sabine Meyer (GAC - Germany): (05:05) High Noon for me :)
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:06) placeholders in the calanders is important
Sabine Meyer (GAC - Germany): (05:07) Could it also be travel from IETF and to IGF?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:07) Quite possibly Sabine
Olivier Crepin-Leblond: (05:07) This might be a special week due to IGF next week hence a lot of people are focussed on João Pessoa
Greg Shatan: (05:08) We need more ripe and juicy material that will inspire people to tune in.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:08) DT-O is absolutly riviting material @Greg !!!
Martin Boyle, Nominet: (05:11) sounds right to me, Jonathan
Martin Boyle, Nominet: (05:11) It is a role that needs to be done and the CWG is the most likely volunteer group
Sabine Meyer (GAC - Germany): (05:11) Also agree that taking this back to the chartering organisations is a good idea.
Martin Boyle, Nominet: (05:11) Having the expertise and historical knowledge
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:12) Yes agree
Jaap Akkerhuis (SSAC): (05:12) I need to go back to SSAC about the implementation role, so, a written proposal will be welcome
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:12) indeed Jaap that would be appropriate for all the CO's
Paul Kane: (05:15) Good Idea Jonathan
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:21) Yoiuy civered it iff jyst fine Chuck
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:21) typos Sorry
Trang Nguyen: (05:22) Thank you, Jonathan. Hello everyone.
Paul Kane: (05:35) Thank you Trang
Chuck Gomes (RySG): (05:37) @ Trang & Paul: Thanks. Very helpful.
Martin Boyle, Nominet: (05:44) Thanks Jonathan
Seun: (05:44) I think it may be good to comment early so Chartering organisation could highlight any area of concern during their submission to the PC as well.
Grace Abuhamad: (05:45) I think Paul meant "CCWG proposl"
Matthew Shears: (05:47) a discussion has just kicked off on the ccwg list w/r/t separation and the neeed to better understand the process and how the CWG's DT L p[rocess fits with the CCWG's Single Designator and community mechanism
Seun: (05:48) I think in remain to names, the separation triggering is a mutual decision between ICANN and community and not by either sides No?
Seun: (05:49) Edit: remain=respect
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (05:50) indeed Greg
Paul Kane: (05:51) Thanks Matthew ... good to know. Thanks Greg, agree that is my point needs to be resolved/clarified now..
Paul Kane: (05:53) Suen - in the event of the CSC or IFR or SIFR identifying there is a fundamental breakdown in service - customers should not suffer
Seun: (05:53) Yeah that's important Paul. Thanks for raising it.
Paul Kane: (05:54) Exactly Jonathan
Greg Shatan: (05:54) Do we need an EBERO-type back-up for IANA?
Matthew Shears: (05:54) Paul - key issue that we need to look at the process for separation very carefully - its multi-step and the opportunity for differences of opinion between the Board and the community could lend themselves to a protracted process
Paul Kane: (05:55) Greg ... hmmm, EBERO for IANA .... hmmm interesting
Brenden Kuerbis: (05:57) Agree that the SIFR process seems overloaded with approvals and would be difficult to expedite if necessary.
Paul Kane: (05:58) Matthew - I think the goal is to avoid a protracted process. It is almost having the tools in the draw so that they are know and efficient ... so will NOT be used.
Seun: (05:58) perhaps what happens to IANA operation during those approval charade would be good to pay attention to as well.
Matthew Shears: (05:59) Probably shold add this issue to the next call to see where the discussion stand Jonathan?
Matthew Shears: (05:59) sorry separation issue
Cheryl Langdon-Orr ALAC - APRegional Member: (06:00) Thanks veryone... Talk again soon ... Bye for now then...
Seun: (06:00) thanks and bye
Tracy Hackshaw (Trinidad & Tobago): (06:00) bye all
Chuck Gomes (RySG): (06:00) Thanks all.
Paul Kane: (06:00) Thanks all ...
Matthew Shears: (06:00) thanks!
jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland): (06:00) thanks and bye!
Eduardo Diaz - (ALAC): (06:00) Adios.
Greg Shatan: (06:00) Bye all! Time to wake up now. :-)
Martin Boyle, Nominet: (06:00) thanks all and bye
Wale Bakare: (06:00) Thanks, bye all
Trang Nguyen: (06:00) Thank you, all. Bye.
Brenden Kuerbis: (06:00) thanks all, bye
Sabine Meyer (GAC - Germany): (06:00) bye bye!
Jaap Akkerhuis (SSAC): (06:00) bye bye
