ALAC: Advice to the ICANN Board on Subsequent Procedures (R-09D)
| Date Issued | Reference ID | Current Phase |
|---|---|---|
| AL-ALAC-ST-0421-02-01-EN (R-09D) | Phase 2 | Understand |
Description:
We also believe that the use of a bona fide intent affirmation – whether for all applicants or otherwise – where factors for establishing a lack of bona fide intent are too subjective, and without deterrence through penalty, serves little purpose.
STATUS UPDATES
| Date | Phase | Type | Status Updates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 2 | AP Feedback | The ALAC reiterates that its Advice of April 16 April 2021 in respect of this topic is clear. We are instead unclear on the Board’s question and wish to refer the Board again to our said Advice. |
| Phase 2 | Clarifying Question | The Board would like to note that, in the Applicant Guidebook to the 2012 round, it states: “Applicants that are identified as being in contention are encouraged to reach a settlement or agreement among themselves that resolves the contention.” The Board would like to clarify whether the ALAC advice is intended to state a preference for resolving contention via the ICANN auction, and if so, what kind of parameters would the ALAC set around that? |
| Phase 2 | Phase Change | Now Phase 2 |
| Phase 1 | Phase Update | Acknowledgment sent to ALAC |
