Meeting Date/Time:  Thursday, 17 November 2022 @ 1800 UTC [time converter]

Zoom Information:

Zoom Link:  https://icann.zoom.us/j/91672296247?pwd=UUIraWZ3TDBiYzFxYzRuaVpwdWdrZz09

Meeting ID: 916 7229 6247  |  Passcode: Ku?Rf0bfME

One tap mobile
+16699006833,,91672296247#,,,,*2817137489# US (San Jose)
+13462487799,,91672296247#,,,,*2817137489# US (Houston)


To dial in by phone:  find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/aCz5e02at

Meeting ID: 916 7229 6247  |  Passcode: 2817137489



For Attendance, Recordings, or Transcripts, please refer to the At-Large wiki page - https://community.icann.org/x/nIcFDQ



Slide Deck:  FINAL - MSM Engagement Session - At-Large OFB - November 2022.pdf

Agenda

Where Do We Stand with MSM Project?

Consensus-based Decision Making

Next Steps



Standard Rules of Behavior - https:/www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en



ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy and Terms of Participation and Complaint Procedure - https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/community-anti-harassment-policy-2017-03-24-en



Zoom Poll Questions - Results to follow:  

Poll # 1 - Did you reach better mutual understanding as a result of using consensus-based decision making?

Yes.

No.


Poll # 2 - Did differing positions successfully converge?

Yes.

No.


Poll # 3 - Have you used/referenced the “Consensus Playbook” in ICANN work (PDPs, Reviews, CCWGs, etc.)?

Yes.

No.


Poll # 4 - Did you achieve better consensus of goals/objectives as a result of using/learning from “Consensus Playbook”?

Yes.

No.


Poll # 5 - Was there good communication and context when converging differing positions?

Yes.

No.


 Poll # 6 -  Did goals/objectives became clearer as a result of consensus-based decision making?

Yes.

No.


Poll # 7 - Do you know the basic principles for making decisions on a consensus basis?

Yes.

No.


Poll # 8 - Are you aware of the existence of “Consensus Playbook”?

Yes.

No.


Poll # 9 - Did the consensus-based decision making contribute to the project (PDPs, Reviews, CCWGs, etc.) success?

Yes.

No.


Comments: 



  • No labels