PROPOSED METRIC SECTION ***STAFF USE ONLY: PLEASE DO NOT EDIT*** | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Metric Description: | Quantity of gTLDs2 before and after expansion. | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | Notes/Comments: | 2 gTLDs before expansion, including 4 generic, 3 generic-restricted, 11 sponsored (omit .gov, .mil, .int, .edu, .arpa) - 17:
| ||||||||||||||||||
3 | AoC Category: | Competition (C) | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | SO/AC Originator: | GNSO | ||||||||||||||||||
STAFF INFORMATION/ANALYSIS SECTION | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Staff Team: | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Metric Currently Measured? | |||||||||||||||||||
7
| Computation: (e.g., data elements, formula, numerator, denominator, ratio/percent, periodicity/frequency) | |||||||||||||||||||
8 | Data Owner: (i.e., party responsible for collecting and publishing metric) | |||||||||||||||||||
9 | Data Reference Source: (i.e., how/where is the data collected, tracked, managed, and published/produced?) | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Targets: |
| ||||||||||||||||||
11 | Implementation Considerations: (e.g., what new or additional resources, tasks, activities, systems, et al., whether internal or external, would be needed to develop, capture, and report this metric?) | |||||||||||||||||||
12 | Degree of Difficulty/Impact: (i.e., net impact on existing ICANN resources, systems, and capabilities) | |||||||||||||||||||
13 | Estimated Development Cost ($M): |
| ||||||||||||||||||
14 | Estimated Ongoing Production Costs: (i.e., incremental to existing funded/budgeted expenditures) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
15 | Estimated Net Incremental Staff (FTE): (Express as a fraction and/or range, e.g., .25 - .50) | |||||||||||||||||||
16 | Itemization of Staff Work Effort: | |||||||||||||||||||
17 | Rough Implementation Timeframe: (e.g., indicate major steps and months/years to complete each one) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
18 | Critical Dependencies: | |||||||||||||||||||
19 | Anticipated Challenges/Risks: | |||||||||||||||||||
METRIC EFFECTIVENESS AND UTILITY SECTION | ||||||||||||||||||||
20 | Explanation of Metric Effectiveness: (i.e., how will success/failure enable conclusions to be drawn concerning the relevant AoC definition?) | |||||||||||||||||||
21 | Metric Effectiveness Assessment: (i.e., vis a vis AoC definition) | |||||||||||||||||||
22 | Overall Feasibility Assessment: LEGEND Poor: Low Effectiveness - High Cost | |||||||||||||||||||
======================================= |
DETAILED ITEMIZATION & TRACKING OF ISSUES
Category A: | Metric Questions & Issues |
---|
No. | Issue Description | Originator | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Category B: | Metric Effectiveness & Utility |
---|
No. | Issue Description | Originator | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Category C: | Technical/Implementation |
---|
No. | Issue Description | Originator | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Category D: | Financial/Cost/Budgetary |
---|
No. | Issue Description | Originator | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Category E: | Other |
---|
No. | Issue Description | Originator | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|