Attendees: 

Sub-Group Members:  Samantha Eisner, David McAuley, Edward Morris, Greg Shatan, Leon Sanchez, Robin Gross

Staff:   Alice Jansen,  Brenda Brewer

Apologies:  

**Please let Brenda know if your name has been left off the list (attendees or apologies).**


Transcript

Transcript_CCWGLegal_19March2015e.docx

Transcript_CCWGLegal_19March2015e.pdf

Recordings

Recordings for this call are not available due to the sensitive material discussed during the meeting.  Redacted transcripts, however, are provided above.

Chat Transcript

AC:  Chat:  (sub team debrief chat only)

  Brenda Brewer: (3/19/2015 12:36) yes , working on that

  Brenda Brewer: (12:38) confirmed disconnected from phone bridge

  David McAuley: (12:38) Thank you Brenda

  David McAuley: (12:53) Agreed Greg, good points

  Edward Morris: (12:54) I'm happy with that formulation Greg.

  Edward Morris: (12:54) Also happy with a hybrid model.

  Leon Sanchez: (12:55) I think that would be a natural working method

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (12:56) yes, primary - I like that approach

  Leon Sanchez: (12:56) Anytime we feel we need a second take on something we should be able to double check with the other firm

  Edward Morris: (12:56) +1 Leon

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (12:56) agreed.

  Edward Morris: (12:58) Agree Greg.

  David McAuley: (12:58) i just called in to another mtg but i will have to leave soon - guessing by 2:10 or so

  Edward Morris: (12:59) Same here David. Council call in 1 minute.

  David McAuley: (13:00) That's right - GNSO call, enjoy!

  David McAuley: (13:00) I had my chance to make my case and I can support this approach, Leon.

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (13:01) I was thinking it was primary for each issue

  David McAuley: (13:01) I had my chance to make my case and I can support this approach, Leon.

  David McAuley: (13:02) I thought otherwise, Robin, thought we would pick a lead firm and drop off other questions as needed

  Greg Shatan (GNSO/CSG/IPC): (13:02) We may be getting into semantics.

  David McAuley: (13:03) How is drfat engagement letter coordinated w ICANN

  Greg Shatan (GNSO/CSG/IPC): (13:05) Happy to share that doc.

  Greg Shatan (GNSO/CSG/IPC): (13:08) Each law firm typically has its own engagement letter.

  Greg Shatan (GNSO/CSG/IPC): (13:08) Clients do not typically send the engagement letter to the firm.

  David McAuley: (13:08) Leon, I need to drop away. If something comes up that you feel I sure reconnect pls send me an email and I will excuse myself from other mtg but I shld try to be there now

  Greg Shatan (GNSO/CSG/IPC): (13:09) I think the personal touch is preferable when telling [firm] they're hired.

  David McAuley: (13:10) Email ok w me - good bye all

  Leon Sanchez: (13:10) Thanks David!

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (13:11) we're doomed either way ;-)

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (13:12) I'm fine with that, Greg.

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (13:12) I'd like to be on the call.

  Edward Morris: (13:13) +1

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (13:14) I think it is important for independence sake that ICANN legal not the coordinator of the call.

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (13:14) I'm talking about leading the call - not conference facilities

  Leon Sanchez: (13:14) For logistics I don't see why would that affect our independence Robin

  Leon Sanchez: (13:15) yes

  Leon Sanchez: (13:15) facilities wise

  Robin Gross [GNSO - NCSG]: (13:15) thanks, all!

  • No labels