Members:
Participants:
Observers and experts:
Staff: Bart Boswinkel, Bernard Turcotte, Kim Carlson
Apologies: Brent Carey, Barrack Otieno (TBD)
Agenda:
- Welcome & Roll Call
- Administrative items (if any)
- Policy document – Bernard (will circulate prior to call)
- AOB
- Next Meetings
- 26 September @11:00 UTC
Documents:
Recording: Zoom Playback
Transcript: EN
Chat Transcript:
17:01:02 From Kimberly Carlson : Welcome to today’s cc PDP on Retirement Working Group call on 12 September at 23:00 UTC. Attendance will be taken based on those on Zoom. Apologies from: Danko Jevtovic, Brent Carey, Barrack Otieno (TBD). As a reminder, all calls are recorded and transcribed (recording and transcript will be posted on the public wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/wLOjBg. Please also remember to keep your phone and microphones muted to avoid background noise.
17:05:26 From Eberhard Lisse : go through the document
17:06:32 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : +1 Patricio
17:06:48 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : call it "retirement event" or something
17:08:06 From Peter Koch (DE) : sorry, there is only one list!
17:08:15 From jaap : In the standard is only one list.
17:08:42 From Peter Koch (DE) : agree with suggestion to define and refer to definition, should that be necessary
17:13:23 From naela.sarras : Agree with Peter. The use of Manager is confusing
17:16:10 From Eberhard Lisse : we need to move away from referring to lists, and therefor Patricio’s suggestion of a definition/glossary is helpful
17:16:41 From Peter Koch (DE) : lines 59 and 60 depend on how we (re)solve the bracketed issue;
17:16:49 From jaap : The standard has a defib=nitiosn what a country is and doesn’t mention that a territory could be considered a country
17:16:55 From ppoblete : All these conditions that define when a ccTLD is to be removed from the root zone should go in the place when that is defined, probably at the point I suggested
17:17:15 From Peter Koch (DE) : it’s an example only, anyway
17:17:22 From jaap : and does mention (sorry)
17:18:27 From Peter Koch (DE) : if we need this amount of discussion, we might want to look for an easier example?
17:19:05 From Eberhard Lisse : I agree with Jaap
17:19:30 From Stephen Deerhake : +1 Jaap.
17:19:37 From bart.boswinkel : Let’s include the glossary which includes the definitions form the ISO
17:19:45 From Stephen Deerhake : We just need to be precise.
17:19:46 From Eberhard Lisse : “ISO 3166 provides universally applicable coded representations of names of countries (current and non- current), dependencies, and other areas of particular geopolitical interest and their subdivisions.”
17:19:56 From Stephen Deerhake : (We will be at the end of the day...)
17:20:46 From jaap : hand finally went down
17:20:54 From Eberhard Lisse : “This part, ISO 3166-1, establishes codes that represent the current names of countries, dependencies, and other areas of particular geopolitical interest, on the basis of lists of country names obtained from the United Nations.”
17:21:21 From Eberhard Lisse : “3.4
country name
name of a country, dependency, or other area of particular geopolitical interest”
17:29:04 From Peter Koch (DE) : line 145 still reads “The WG anticipates …”; I think we wanted to change that language to clarify whether this is a footnote, a remark or ina any way normative
17:33:13 From Kimberly Carlson : Thank you all, bye
17:33:14 From Bernard Turcotte : bye all
17:33:15 From Nick Wenban-Smith, Nominet : Ciao!
17:33:16 From bart.boswinkel : Notes will be circulated later
17:33:17 From Sean Copeland : bye
17:33:21 From ppoblete : Bye!
17:33:26 From jaap : bye
