You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Decision Requirements

  • Do we wish to “endorse” all applicants to want to represent us?
  • If not, how do we select one or more?
  • Regardless of the above, do we want to indicate an order of preference?
  • If we do any sort of selection, what criteria do we use? Specifically, how do we recognize the person(s) who we will endorse to represent us. To what extent should prior knowledge of ICANN, prior involvement with ICANN, and prior involvement with the formally defined At-Large Community be factored in?
  • Given the time frame, to what extent can the entire At-Large Community - the ALSs, RALOs and even the entire ALAC MEANINGFULLY participate?
  • To what extent do we wish to require ALAC specific information from the candidates? If any, what? Note that the inclusion of the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information of the US Department of Commerce sets the tone for this group – it is a HIGH-level group of people.
  • To what extent, at this late date, do we issue a further call for applications?
  • Do we wish our endorsed but not accepted candidates to be held for future reviews?
  • Do we want to consider the option of equity with the GAC and the Board by allowing our Chair or her/his delegate to participate in the process? Among other merits, it makes the representative responsible to and answerable to the ALAC and implicitly At-Large?
  • No labels