You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

"Towards a more innovative and revitalised At-Large"

Category

1 = Low Needs
2 =Medium Needs
3 = High Needs
4 = Unassigned
Task DescriptionsIssue Numbers (where relevant)ALAC Proposal TextTask Type

Risk Level

1 = Low
2 = Medium
3 = High


Penholder(s)ProgressStarting DateNo. Weeks
1

Implementation Development



Goal
Maureen Hilyard

17%

IN PROGRESS

28/08/201817

Meetings

Implementation Activity





ARIWG formed and has met; project introduced.

Implementation Activity1Maureen Hilyard

100%

COMPLETED

28/08/20181

Introduction completed

Milestone





Quality vs quantity of ALAC advice#1

Staff, under the direction of At-Large
leadership, has already begun to
rework the website and Wiki to ensure that our “Policy Advice” pages are accurate and understandable. This will continue as volunteer and staff resources allow. We will also ensure that as documents are published, the classification of the document is clear.

Implementation Activity1Jonathan Zuck and Marita Moll

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Leadership Team (ALT), which is not mandated by ICANN Bylaws, concentrates in the established leadership too many decision-making and other administrative powers which should be spread among the members of the ALAC.#4
Implementation Activity1Maureen Hilyard and Hadia Elminiawi

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Excessive amounts of At-Large Community time spent on process and procedure at expense of ALAC’s mandated responsibilities to produce policy advice and coordinate outreach and engagement activities. Too many internal working groups are a distraction.#7
Implementation Activity1Javier Rúa-Jovet and Ricardo Holmquist

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Absence of consistent performance metrics.#16
Implementation Activity1Dev Anand Teelucksingh and Joanna Kulesza

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Category 1 completed

Milestone














2

Need for increased At-Large Community awareness and staff training regarding the use of social media.

#9
Implementation Activity
John Laprise and Holly Raiche

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Uneven contribution of At-Large to a coordinated ICANN strategy for ‘Outreach and Engagement’. Missed opportunities for coordination with other constituencies and ICANN staff.#5 (similar to #12)
Implementation Activity
Tijani Ben Jemaa and Seun Ojedeji

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Need more systematic RALO participation in regional events#13
Implementation Activity
Glenn McKnight and Daniel Nanghaka

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Category 2 completed

Milestone














3

At-Large has struggled to reflect/process end-user opinion; barriers to individual participation; perception of unchanging leadership group.

#2

At-Large is increasingly focusing on
individuals (both unaffiliated At-Large
Members as well as members within
each ALS) instead of just ALS voting representatives. Four of the five
(RALOs) allow individual members and
the fifth, LACRALO, has already
approved the concept and is developing
the detailed rules. We will also use the
ALSes to communicate with those within
an ALS who may have an interest in
ICANN.
RALOs have also started to identify
experts on ICANN topics within their
ALSes and among individual members
and to increasingly engage them in
ALAC’s policy work. Thus, a bi-
directional flow of ICANN information

continues to be strengthened.
Implementation Activity3Bastiaan Goslings and Bartlett Morgan

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Staff resources are disproportionately concentrated on administrative support. Staff should have greater capacity to support preparation of policy advice.#3
Implementation Activity3Holly Raiche and Hadia Elminiawi

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Election processes are excessively complex and have been open to allegations of unfairness.#6
Implementation Activity3Sébastien Bachollet and Alan Greenberg

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Social media and other Internet-based tools could be used more effectively, and at minimal cost, to continuously survey and channel end-user input into ICANN policy making processes.#8
Implementation Activity3John Laprise and Dev Anand Teelucksingh

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

There are a multitude of communications channels used by At Large. This has led to fractured and undocumented communications.#10
Implementation Activity3Dev Anand Teelucksingh and John Laprise

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

While broadly popular, Global ATLAS meetings every 5 years have been difficult to organize and short on effective results. More frequent regional meetings would be more effective in encouraging both policy input and outreach while familiarizing more of At Large with workings of ICANN.
#11
Implementation Activity3Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Eduardo Diaz and Humberto Carrasco

0%

TO START

28/08/201817

Category 3 completed

Milestone














4

ALAC input to a coordinated ICANN Outreach sub-optimal.

#12 (similar to #5)
Implementation Activity3Maureen HilyardAlan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28/08/201817

Need for an innovative approach to funding a revitalized At-Large.#14
Implementation Activity3Maureen HilyardAlan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28/08/201817

Need to reinforce impact of outreach and engagement activities.#15
Implementation Activity3Maureen HilyardAlan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28/08/201817

Category 4 completed

Milestone














  • No labels