You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

  1. Why is "not inconsistent" used rather than "consistent" for the policy recommendations being implemented? Does it mean the same thing?
    1. When the board was considering the recommendations, they found some recommendations "inconsistent" with the GAC Advice. And, these "inconsistent" recommendation were not adapted for implementation. In contrast, the recommendations that were "not inconsistent" were adapted for implementation. Therefore, "not inconsistent" and "consistent" do mean the same for the purposes of our implementation.
  2. When will the "inconsistent" recommendation be resolved for implementation?
    1. The timing and the process for resolving these inconsistencies depends activities outside of this policy implementation team and IRT. Any scope change for this policy implementation project must be received from the board resolution. Please refer to the GNSO Policy Development Project page for progress of activities regarding the board adaption:
  3. Who should I contact if I have questions?
    1. Submit questions via with the following subject heading “Inquiry – IGO/INGO Identifier Protection Policy.”


  • No labels