ICANN and Human Rights Meeting
|29 May 2015|
Click here to expand...
Click here to expand...
Maryam Bakoshi:Dear all, welcome to the ICANN and HR call on Friday 29th May 2015
Maryam Bakoshi:Rafik Dammak and Niels Ten Oever have joined the meeting
Marilia Maciel:Hello all!
Maryam Bakoshi:Welcome Marilia
Maryam Bakoshi:Monika has joined
rafik:maybe she is shy :)
Monika Zalnieriute:I also right it here:)
Monika Zalnieriute:haha, I read that I am shy here:)
Monika Zalnieriute:ok, I wait for the call then!
Niels ten Oever - Article19:Monika, can you pick up?
Monika Zalnieriute:I still did not get a call
Maryam Bakoshi: Pranesh Prakash
Monika Zalnieriute:but I can hear You though,
Maryam Bakoshi:Vipul Karbhanda
Maryam Bakoshi:have both joined
Monika Zalnieriute:mayeb someone know, what I should click to make my mic work?
Niels ten Oever - Article19:Clicl on the mic Monika
Maryam Bakoshi:Alexandra please could you state your full name for record purposes. Thank you
Alexandra:Maryam, it's Alexandra Kulikova
Marilia Maciel:Please start the recording
Monika Zalnieriute:yes, I can,
Marilia Maciel:Please, can we let the ppl on the phone introduce themselves?
Alexandra:i'm not sure I won't be able to speak though unfortunately(
Marilia Maciel:Please, mute your mics
rafik:niels shoulds disable the mic for his adobe connect :)
Marianne F:Hi all , there is feedback so we are hearing Niels twice
Marianne F:You're welcom Monika, apologies for the lengthy email nonetheless! :)
Marilia Maciel:What is the deadline to comment?
Niels ten Oever - Article19:Depends if we want to print it nicely
Niels ten Oever - Article19:If we want it to be gone via editor, design and print, we will need to have it done by Monday
rafik:@Niels it is a working document for CCWP to continue the discussion, expecting the CCWP to produce its first delvierable
Niels ten Oever - Article19:Indeed, so we need to agree on a approval procedure (point 1.3 :) )
rafik:I would see it as an "issue report" not necessarily needed an approval , it is more research work to give input
Niels ten Oever - Article19:let's discuss this under the next point
Pranesh Prakash:If we don't make a strong defence of HR, who will? :-) Having said that I don't think there's a need to establish a duty to protect on ICANN's part.
Marianne F:OF course, they do have this responsibility just we need to proceed step by step. So if the point is made in a note then it is there on the record to be used and referred to later if need be (just reiterating verbal point in writing)
Niels ten Oever - Article19:+1
Maryam Bakoshi:Nigel Hickson has joined
Marilia Maciel:Audio issues here. Will have to go out and enter again, sorry
Marianne F:+1 from me for leaving it in as example; just to edit and tighten up for now and indicate there option of more detailed analysis later
Pranesh Prakash:+1 to Marianne
Monika Zalnieriute:Guys, I agree to have it as an example: would You like to have it a shorter part though for now?
Monika Zalnieriute:in this particular report?
Monika Zalnieriute:+ Lee; it might be too much stuff.
Monika Zalnieriute:All at once.
Marianne F:Hi, if the feeling is to keep it in then perhaps as a note? But Lee is pointing out the timing issue so I would defer to those who know ICANN better than I do
Marianne F:Please mute mics when typing! :)
Marianne F:If in doubt leave it out
Alexandra:Agree that the UDRP part might draw attention from the substantial issues int he first partin the shape it is now
Alexandra:I might have missed it - could smb please remind again how GAC is going to be engaged?
Pranesh Prakash:Apologies. I have to leave now. But would just like to reiterate that we mustI (strategically) bear the burden of being the people who take positions on sensitive commercial issues. If we don't, no one else will. We can build bridges after we have some rough position.
Marianne F:+1 from me Pranesh; point well taken, cheerio!
rafik:@Alexandra we have some GAC members in the CCWP, it has its own working group and Lee is basically doing the liaison. maybe Lee can elaborate here
Marilia Maciel:Maybe we could move to the session in BA?
Monika Zalnieriute:So I would like to get the idea what do we do?: please type in here, so I could briefly have an idea who is for LEAVING the UDRP and who is for TAKING OUT
Niels ten Oever - Article19:The consensus seems to be that it could be mentioned as an short example, but we leave ourt the longer expose.
Marilia Maciel:Yes, that is my feeling too
rafik:@monika in few words more coming work for you :)
Monika Zalnieriute:Ok, how long - and how detailed - simply a page or so or approx how long?
Niels ten Oever - Article19:Shorter
Marianne F:Mention it, keep it short as a concrete example vs. a full expose.
Monika Zalnieriute:yes, yes, so simply a single refernece, You mean - thats it?
Monika Zalnieriute:shorter than a page, You mean?
Niels ten Oever - Article19:Yes
Monika Zalnieriute:simply like an example mentione, in a sentence?:)
Alexandra:guys, just a quick comment/observation: an elaborate description of this one case study now will definitely attract criticism from Russian GAC representatives - as at the Signapore meeting they were very vocal on the Crimean domains issue from the HR perspective. It's a very debateable issue in terms of how exactly that relates to the ICANN remit, but if the HRtalk starts with UDRP in detail I can expect the reaction :) what I mean is that there seems to be a strong link for them berween ICANN and that incidet in the HR context. I can expect there will be efforts to stick it in
Marianne F:.. I see your point but won't there be this sort of push back anyway? If this example really could become a red herring (forgive the pun) then leave it out for now. We can always put it back in...
Alexandra:yeah I guess you're right.. But it would be good to at least formulate some stance on the issue from the group? or have a longer least of potential case studies for future
rafik:there will be pish back for many topics, that is why we have to work on consensus and "educate"
Marilia Maciel:Yes, open to collaboration/endorsements
rafik:we need to get CCWP to have ownership on itw own deliverable
Marianne F:I agree; send the final version of the report to the CCWP for comments. People comment best when there is something concrete to comment on.
rafik:the public session is not clashing with important sessions
rafik:kathy is not coming to BA
Marilia Maciel:I would go bit further and ask them for their aseesment
Marilia Maciel:some sort of responsibility to speak
Marianne F:Thanks Niels, thanks all for a great meeting
Marilia Maciel:Thanks all
Marilia Maciel:Bye all!
Alexandra:thanks everyone and bye!