You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 37 Next »



GNSO Supplementary 360 Assessment: Now Open!

English

 Français

 Español

Русский

简体中文

العربية

 Answer ChoicesResponses 
Completed (2012-2014) Non-PDP Joint DNS Security and Stability Analysis2
Completed (2011-2013) Non-PDP Fake Renewal Notices Drafting Team0
Completed (2011-2013) Non-PDP Study Group on Use of Names for Countries and Territories0
Completed (2011-2013) Non-PDP WHOIS Survey Requirements0
Completed (2008-2013) PDP Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery0
Completed (2012-2012) Non-PDP: Uniformity of Contracts to Address Registration Abuse0
Completed (2011-2012) Non-PDP: Protection of Red Cross/IOC Names in New gTLDs2
Completed (2011-2012) Non PDP: Consumer Trust1
Completed (2008-2012) Non-PDP: GNSO Improvements1
Completed (2009-2012) Non-PDP: SSAC GNSO IRD0
Completed (2010-2011) Non-PDP: Joint SO/AC on New gTLD Applicant Support1
Completed (2010-2011) Non-PDP: Recommendation 60
Completed (2009-2011) Non-PDP: Registration Abuse Policies1
Completed (2008-2011) PDP: Fast Flux1
Completed (2009-2010) Non-PDP: Affirmation of Commitments0
Completed (2009-2010) Non-PDP: Special Trademark Issues0
Completed (2009-2010) PDP: Vertical Integration2
Completed (2008-2009) PDP: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Development Process  Part A2
Completed (2009-2009) Non-PDP: Trademark Protections  Implementation Recommendation Team1
Active PDP: IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms0
Active PDP: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy-B1
Active PDP: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy-C1
Active PDP: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy-D1
Active PDP: gTLD Registration Data Services0
Active PDP: Locking of a Domain Name1
Active PDP: Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs2
Active PDP: Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues3
Active PDP: 'Thick' Whois0
Active PDP: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information2
Other (please specify)
Total30


GNSO Survey:

English

Français

Español

Русский

简体中文

العربية

For users wishing to view the survey before completing it, a copy of the English version of the survey can be downloaded in PDF format by clicking here.

 

Composition of Responses Based on 
Participation in ICANN Question (#5)

107 Completed responses as of 29 September 2014

GNSO Review Frequently Asked Questions have now been updated!

Background Information

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN") is seeking a provider to conduct an independent review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO), as mandated by ICANN's Bylaws.

As part of ICANN's ongoing commitment to its evolution and improvement, Article IV – Section 4 of ICANN's Bylaws contains provisions for "periodic review of the performance and operation of each Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization Council, each Advisory Committee (other than the Governmental Advisory Committee), and the Nominating Committee."

These periodic reviews present ICANN structures with opportunities for continuous improvement through consistent application of compliance review principles to objectively measure performance relative to specific and quantifiable criteria developed by ICANN based on the unique nature of its structures. The resulting implementation of improvements and the systematic means of measuring performance and validating effectiveness of implementation are of utmost importance to the ongoing legitimacy of ICANN.

The GNSO is the policy-making body responsible for generic Top-Level Domains, such as .COM, .NET, and .ORG. Its members include representatives from generic Top Level Domains (gTLD) registries, gTLDregistrars, intellectual property interest, Internet service providers, businesses and non-commercial interests. The GNSO strives to keep gTLDs operating in a fair, orderly fashion across one global Internet, while promoting innovation and competition.


 

  • No labels