Staff and Community Members | Email Addresses |
---|---|
Roelof Meijer | Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl |
Raimundo Beca | rbeca@imaginaccion.cl |
Paul Diaz | pdiaz@pir.org |
Aba Diakite | aba.diakite@icann.org |
Janice Douma Lange | janice.lange@icann.org |
Xavier Calvez | xavier.calvez@icann.org |
Carole Cornell | |
Larisa Gurnick | larisa.gurnick@icann.org |
This Ad Hoc Community Group is discussing the current situation and need for improvement in the realm of ICANN Budget Planning. There is cross over with the Strategic Plan methodology in that ICANN needs to look at both Plans together, align them in a transparent way so that the linkage between the two is apparaent to the community. Also dealing with consistency in the planning cycle so that community can depend on certain dates and durations for the milestones within the planning cycle.
Invited into this wiki will be Carole Cornell and Larisa Gurnick, who has been consulting on the ICANN Strategic Plan for over a year, working with Carole and other staff members who have engaged the community in this process. She is available for questions and input on this wiki, but we need to keep that contained to the Planning cycle, not the Strat Plan itself (structure and content).
Notes from the kickoff session on 27 July are found in "Working Document" (use paper clip), which includes current situation and areas for improvement.
Drafts of proposed high level planning cycles are attached under "Planning Cycles" (paper clip)
Please engage and comment! There is already a comment thread started below.
1 Comment
Janice Douma.Lange
Chuck Gomes, a member of the Community Timeline Ad Hoc Group, posed 2 questions to both the staff working on the Strategic Plan and our Strategic Planning Ad Hoc community group. Please see responses below and any further comment encouraged:
Response: Roelof Meijer I don’t think so for those two of the three years. In the two “dusting off” years, it would seem to me that ICANN could publish a draft of the SP straight away, especially if it is accompanied by a rationale on significant changes or the absence of any of those. Timing should be such that draft can be discussed with community during an ICANN Meeting. Public comments period should be maintained, followed by feed back on comments received and submission of final version to board for approval
Response: Roelof Meijer I can think of only one: the comments periods for Strategic Plan and Ops Plan & Budget should better not overlap
Response: Larisa Gurnick, Strat Plan consultant and Carole Cornell, ICANN staff