SSAC Comment on the ICANN gTLD Registry Transition Processes Model (R1)
| Date Issued | Document | Reference ID | Current Phase |
|---|---|---|---|
| SSAC Comment on the ICANN gTLD Registry Transition Processes Model (R1) | SAC047 | CLOSED |
Description:
The SSAC recommends that ICANN define a testing process that emulates a full failover scenario and that successor and emergency registry operators demonstrate their ability to satisfy the testing criteria.
STATUS UPDATES
| Date | Phase | Type | Status Updates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 3 | Phase Update | Board resolution to implement passed Resolutions 2021.03.25.04 – 2021.03.25.06 on 25 March 2021: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2021-03-25-en#1.b |
| Phase 2 | AP Feedback | ICANN received confirmation of understanding from the RSSAC |
| Phase 2 | Phase Update | ICANN org understands that this recommendation is asking for an initial implementation of the measurement system described in RSSAC047. The "initial implementation" is assumed to be functional, but not necessarily up to the operational expectations that a long-term service would have. This recommendation is to the ICANN Board. This understanding was sent to the RSSAC for review |
| Phase 2 | AP Feedback | RRSAC provided clarifying comments to ICANN Org's understanding - The work described in RSSAC047 is based on a largely empirical model of measurement rather than analytics (see last bullet in Recommendation 3 - cell F14). Therefore, we suggest that the phrase "initial implementation of the measurement and analysis systems” in cell G12 be changed to "initial implementation of the measurement system” to reflect the empirical nature of the initial implementation. |
| Phase 2 | Phase Update | ICANN org understands that this recommendation is asking for an initial implementation of the measurement and analysis systems described in RSSAC047. The "initial implementation" is assumed to be functional, but not necessarily up to the operational expectations that a long-term service would have. This recommendation is to the ICANN Board. This understanding was sent to the RSSAC for review |
