Page History
The meeting of the GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP is scheduled on Thursday, 08 November 2018 at 14:00 UTC for 2 hours. Please note, will plan for 90 minute discussion with 30 minutes to run over if needed.
06:00 PST, 09:00 EST, 15:00 Paris CET, 19:00 Karachi PKT, 23:00 Tokyo JST, (Wednesday) 01:00 Melbourne AEDT
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y89kusyr
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA EPDP Meeting #24 Agenda Thursday, 8 November 2018
3. Review of Responsible Parties Recommendations (Thomas)*
4. Review proposed updates to staff-suggested Natural vs. Legal persons text
5. Review of Consolidated Data Elements Matrix Objective of discussion:
6. Wrap and confirm next meeting to be scheduled for Tuesday 13 November at 14.00 UTC.
*Please note if the responsible parties draft recommendations are not ready for tomorrow’s call, we will discuss redaction in its place. BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS Data Elements Matrix Issues - 7 November 2018 AUDIO CAST INFORMATION AND VIEW ONLY ADOBE CONNECT FOR ALTERNATES AND OBSERVERS To join the event, click on the link: Listen in browser: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01 Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u View-Only Adobe Connect room for alternates and observers: https://participate.icann.org/gnso-epdp-observers |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Emily Taylor (RrSG), Kavouss Arasteh (GAC), Ashley Heineman (GAC) Alternates: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid (RrSG), Rahul Gosain (GAC), Laureen Kapin (GAC) |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items EPDP Team Meeting #24EPDP Team Meeting #24 8 November 2018
High-level Notes/Action Items
1. Any EPDP Team members wishing to work with Thomas and the small group on the responsible parties/joint controllership discussion, should reach out to Thomas and complete the small group doodle poll as soon as possible. 2. Support Staff will the rework language for natural vs. legal persons to the mailing list so that EPDP Team members can include and/or correct their own viewpoints. Please propose edits by tomorrow, Friday, 9 November. 3. Berry Cobb described inconsistencies in the data matrices and proposed changes to resolve the consistencies. After receiving feedback in today’s meeting, Berry will summarize the revised changes made to the data elements matrix as a result of this discussion and send the summary of proposed changes to the mailing list shortly. Question to ICANN Org: Is making the natural vs. legal persons distinction in WHOIS within the picket fence, i.e., a suitable topic for policy discussion? Notes These high-level notes are designed to help the EPDP Team navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/2IpHBQ. 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates
2. Welcome and Updates from EPDP Team Chair
a. Review of outstanding action items
b. Other updates, if applicable
3. Review of Responsible Parties Recommendations (Thomas) a. Review and discuss draft recommendations
EPDP Team Feedback
b. Confirm next steps, if any
4. Review proposed updates to staff-suggested Natural vs. Legal persons text a. Review and discuss draft approach
b. Confirm next steps, if any
5. Review of Consolidated Data Elements Matrix
1. Post GDPR, is the compliance team's assessment correct that registrars do not need to transfer data to registries for this purpose? 2. At any point when a provider needs to have the registration data revealed, in all cases, the Provider contacts the registrar to acquire that data, so does that mean transfer of certain data elements from registrar to registry is not warranted under Purpose M? 3. In looking at the PDDRP and RRDRP, if one of these RPMs is invoked, does data need to be transferred from the registrar to the registry?
Feedback from EPDP Team:
6. Wrap and confirm next meeting to be scheduled for Tuesday 13 November at 14.00 UTC. a. Confirm action items b. Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any 8 November 2018 High-level Notes/Action Items 1. Any EPDP Team members wishing to work with Thomas and the small group on the responsible parties/joint controllership discussion, should reach out to Thomas and complete the small group doodle poll as soon as possible. 2. Support Staff will the rework language for natural vs. legal persons to the mailing list so that EPDP Team members can include and/or correct their own viewpoints. Please propose edits by tomorrow, Friday, 9 November. 3. Berry Cobb described inconsistencies in the data matrices and proposed changes to resolve the consistencies. After receiving feedback in today’s meeting, Berry will summarize the revised changes made to the data elements matrix as a result of this discussion and send the summary of proposed changes to the mailing list shortly. Question to ICANN Org: Is making the natural vs. legal persons distinction in WHOIS within the picket fence, i.e., a suitable topic for policy discussion? Notes These high-level notes are designed to help the EPDP Team navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/2IpHBQ. 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates
2. Welcome and Updates from EPDP Team Chair a. Review of outstanding action items
b. Other updates, if applicable
3. Review of Responsible Parties Recommendations (Thomas) a. Review and discuss draft recommendations
EPDP Team Feedback
b. Confirm next steps, if any
4. Review proposed updates to staff-suggested Natural vs. Legal persons text a. Review and discuss draft approach
b. Confirm next steps, if any
5. Review of Consolidated Data Elements Matrix
1. Post GDPR, is the compliance team's assessment correct that registrars do not need to transfer data to registries for this purpose? 2. At any point when a provider needs to have the registration data revealed, in all cases, the Provider contacts the registrar to acquire that data, so does that mean transfer of certain data elements from registrar to registry is not warranted under Purpose M? 3. In looking at the PDDRP and RRDRP, if one of these RPMs is invoked, does data need to be transferred from the registrar to the registry? Feedback from EPDP Team:
6. Wrap and confirm next meeting to be scheduled for Tuesday 13 November at 14.00 UTC. a. Confirm action items b. Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any |