Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

PhaseRecommendationsApprovedConsensus CallsUnder Review/PendingStaff to Draft
113100%0%0%0%
270%ON HOLD0%0%
31443%14%43%100%

Documents On Hold:


PHASE 3:

GNSO Review Implementation Charter Recs 26-27-28-29 28 November 2017.pdfStatus: Draft charter sent out for review on 17 August; further staff revisions on 28 August, discussed on 28 September.  Revised draft sent out for review on 28 November and for discussion on 30 November. On hold pending GDPR outcomes.

GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 33 v1 10 May 2017.pdf – Moved from Phase I; Status: On hold pending recommendations of the Work Stream CCWG Subteam on DiversityStaff is drafting charter for review.

Consensus Call:

Implementation Plans Completed and Approved by Consensus:

...

Implementation Plans Ongoing and Approved by Consensus:

TBD

...

Detailed Status:

Recommendations

...

that Relate to Diversity (

...

possible link to recommendations of the Work Stream 2 CCWG Subgroup on Diversity):

Phase 3:

GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 6 17 August 2017.pdf– Recommendation 6: That the GNSO record and regularly publish statistics on Working Group participation (including diversity statistics). Status: Further staff revisions on 28 August, discussed on 31 August – combine with Recommendations 33 and 36 that also relate to diversity.On hold pending recommendations of the Work Stream CCWG Subteam on Diversity  Status: Staff is drafting charter.

GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 33 v1 10 May 2017.pdf – (Moved from Phase I) Recommendation 33: That Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies, and the Nominating Committee, in selecting their candidates for appointment to the GNSO Council, should aim to increase the geographic, gender and cultural diversity of its participants, as defined in ICANN Core Value 4.  Status: Combine with Recommendations 6 and 36 that also relate to diversity.   On hold pending recommendations of the Work Stream CCWG Subteam on DiversityStatus: Staff is drafting charter.

Recommendation 35: That the GNSO Council establish a Working Group, whose membership specifically reflects the demographic, cultural, gender and age diversity of the Internet as a whole, to recommend to Council ways to reduce barriers to participation in the GNSO by non- English speakers and those with limited command of English. Status: Staff is drafting charter.

Recommendation 36: That, when approving the formation of a PDP Working Group, the GNSO Council requires that its membership represent as far as reasonably practicable the geographic, cultural and gender diversity of the Internet as a whole. Additionally, that when approving GNSO Policy, the ICANN Board explicitly satisfy itself that the GNSO Council undertook these actions when approving the formation of a PDP Working GroupOn hold pending recommendations of the Work Stream CCWG Subteam on DiversityStatus: Staff is drafting charter.

Phase 1: Work Already Underway

...

Recommendation 20: That the GNSO Council should review annually ICANN’s Strategic Objectives with a view to planning future policy development that strikes a balance between ICANN’s Strategic Objectives and the GNSO resources available for policy development. Recommendation 21: That the GNSO Council should regularly undertake or commission analysis of trends in gTLDs in order to forecast likely requirements for policy and to ensure those affected are well-represented in the policy-making process. See: GNSO Review Implementation Charter Recs 20 - 21 February 2018.pdf

...

Staff to Draft Charter:

Recommendation 35: That the GNSO Council establish a Working Group, whose membership specifically reflects the demographic, cultural, gender and age diversity of the Internet as a whole, to recommend to Council ways to reduce barriers to participation in the GNSO by non- English speakers and those with limited command of English.

Recommendation 36: That, when approving the formation of a PDP Working Group, the GNSO Council requires that its membership represent as far as reasonably practicable the geographic, cultural and gender diversity of the Internet as a whole. Additionally, that when approving GNSO Policy, the ICANN Board explicitly satisfy itself that the GNSO Council undertook these actions when approving the formation of a PDP Working Group.

...

Recommendation 6: That the GNSO record and regularly publish statistics on Working Group participation (including diversity statistics). Status: Further staff revisions on 28 August, discussed on 31 August – combine with Recommendations 33 and 36 that also relate to diversity.

...

  Status: Staff is drafting charter.

GNSO Review Implementation Charter Recs 26-27-28-29 28 November 2017.pdf– Recommendations 26, 27, 28, 29: 26 – That GNSO Council members, Executive Committee members of Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies and members of Working Groups complete and maintain a current, comprehensive Statement of Interest on the GNSO website. Where individuals represent bodies or clients, this information is to be posted. If not posted because of client confidentiality, the participant’s interest or position must be disclosed. Failing either of these, the individual not be permitted to participate. 27 – That the GNSO establish and maintain a centralized publicly available list of members and individual participants of every Constituency and Stakeholder Group (with a link to the individual’s Statement of Interest where one is required and posted).  28 – That section 6.1.2 Membership of Chapter 6.0 Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies: Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines of the GNSO Operating Procedures be revised to clarify that key clauses are mandatory rather than advisory, and to institute meaningful sanctions for non-compliance where appropriate. 29 – That Statements of Interest of GNSO Council Members and Executive Committee members of all Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies include the total number of years that person has held leadership positions in ICANN.  Status: Draft charter sent out for review on 17 August; discussed on 28 September.  Staff provided a revised charter on 28 November for discussion at the meeting on 30 November. On hold pending GDPR outcomes.