Page History
...
GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 10-11 v1 07 June 2017.pdf – On hold pending evaluation of Geographic Names Facilitated Session at ICANN59.
GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 30 v1 13 July 2017.pdf – Began discussion on 27 July 2017; staff to revise charter and send to the WG for review.
Consensus Call:
CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 19 v3 28 July 2017.pdf – Began discussion on 13 July 2017; continued on 27 July 2017; staff revised the charter and sent it to the WG for review for one week ending 04 August; no objections were received then sent for a consensus call for two weeks ending 21 August 2017.
CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Review Implementation Charter Rec 30 v2 09 August 2017.pdf – Began discussion on 27 July 2017; staff revised the charter and sent it to the WG to review; the WG agreed with the changes and directed staff to send the revised charter out for a consensus call for two weeks ending 31 August 2017.
Implementation Plans Completed and Approved by Consensus:
...
| Phase | Recommendations | Approved | Consensus Calls | Under Review/Pending | Staff to Draft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 64% | 9%18% | 27%18% | 0% |
| 2 | 8 | 0% | 0% | 37.5% | 67.5% |
| 3 | 15 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
...
Recommendation 8: That Working Groups should have an explicit role in responding to implementation issues related to policy they have developed.
Recommendation 13: That the GNSO Council evaluate and, if appropriate, pilot a technology solution (such as Loomio or similar) to facilitate wider participation in Working Group consensus-based decision making. Due 27 July 2017.
Recommendation 14 & 15: 14 – That the GNSO further explores PDP ‘chunking’ and examines each potential PDP as to its feasibility for breaking into discrete stages. 15 – That the GNSO continues current PDP Improvements Project initiatives to address timeliness of the PDP.
...
Out for Consensus Call:
Recommendation 13: That the GNSO Council evaluate and, if appropriate, pilot a technology solution (such as Loomio or similar) to facilitate wider participation in Working Group consensus-based decision making. Due 27 July 2017.
WG Reviewing Charters:
Recommendations 10/11 10 – That the GNSO Council develop criteria for Working Groups to engage a professional facilitator/moderator in certain situations. 11 – That the face-to-face PDP Working Group pilot project be assessed when completed. If the results are beneficial, guidelines should be developed and support funding made available. Status: On hold pending evaluation of Geographic Names Facilitated Session at ICANN59.
Recommendation 19: As strategic manager rather than a policy body the GNSO Council should continue to focus on ensuring that a Working Group has been properly constituted, has thoroughly fulfilled the terms of its charter and has followed due process. Status: Staff has revised with additional references and sent for a one-week review. If there are no objections it will be sent for a two-week consensus call.
Recommendation 30: That the GNSO develop and implement a policy for the provision of administrative support for Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and that Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies annually review and evaluate the effectiveness of administrative support they receive. Status: Staff will revise the charter based on the discussion from the call on 27 July.
WG Reviewing Charters/Pending:
Recommendations 10/11 10 – That the GNSO Council develop criteria for Working Groups to engage a professional facilitator/moderator in certain situations. 11 – That the face-to-face PDP Working Group pilot project be assessed when completed. If the results are beneficial, guidelines should be developed and support funding made available. Status: On hold pending evaluation of Geographic Names Facilitated Session at ICANN59.
Phase 2: High Priority Recommendations
...
MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2: Recommendation 31: That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in the GNSO Policy Development Process continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work it should consider how the GAC could appoint a non-binding, non-voting liaison to the Working Group of each relevant GNSO PDP as a means of providing timely input. Status: Resume discussion in Phase 2Version 2 out for review and discussion per changes suggested at the meeting on 17 August. Discussion continues on 31 August.
MOVED FROM PHASE 1 TO 2: Recommendation 18: That the GNSO Council evaluate post implementation policy effectiveness on an ongoing basis (rather than periodically as stated in the current GNSO Operating Procedures); and that these evaluations are analyzed by the GNSO Council to monitor and improve the drafting and scope of future PDP Charters and facilitate the effectiveness of GNSO policy outcomes over time. Status: On hold pending implementation review.
...
