Page History
Members:
Alain Patrick Aina - Rapporteur
Denise Michel
Ram Krishna Pariyar
Mandate: The group will be responsible for reviewing the implementation of the first Security, Stability and Resiliency (SSR1) Review Team's work and drafting a document outlining the effectiveness of said implementation.
Email Archives: https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr1implementation-ssr2-rt
Conference calls: https://community.icann.org/display/SSR/Subgroup+Conference+Calls
Subgroup templates: https://community.icann.org/display/SSR/Subgroups
Background Materials
Subgroup Documents
The information below is archived:
Members:
Alain Patrick Aina - Rapporteur
Denise Michel
Ram Krishna Pariyar
Mandate: The group will be responsible for reviewing the implementation of the first Security, Stability and Resiliency (SSR1) Review Team's work and drafting a document outlining the effectiveness of said implementation.
Email Archives: HERE
Conference calls: https://community.icann.org/display/SSR/Subgroup+Conference+Calls
Background Materials
Date
Document (Versions in Red are latest)
OPEN ACTIONS/REQUESTS
*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert
Anticipated Completion Date*
SSR1 Rec 21: Is there a plan for getting public comment on the template prior to using it for publishing information on budget and resource impacts related to SSR events?
SSR1 Rec 21: Where is the budgetary information as it pertains to the SSR? And where is the cost benefit analysis for making these decisions?
SSR1 Rec 21: Where is the evidence that a more structured internal process has been developed for SSR budgetary considerations? How do these decisions map onto ICANN’s planning framework and process?
SSR1 Rec 21: Can ICANN provide an update as to the status of phase two (identifying mechanisms that that provide detailed public information on SSR-related budgets), and the steps still to be taken to ensure this recommendation is properly implemented?
SSR1 Rec 22: Since the publication of the SSR1 report, what materials have been published by the SSR team that are specific to the implementation of the new gTLD Program? How has that work been budgeted and resourced?
SSR1 Rec 25: Since the publication of the SSR1 Final Report, what mechanisms have been put into place to incorporate near and long-term risks into a formal, strategic Risk Management Framework for ICANN?
SSR1 Rec 25: Since the Board approval of the 2014 Risk Management Framework provided by an external consultant, what further review, consultation or further work has been done on the approved Framework?
SSR1 Rec 25: Please provide evidence of briefings to the Board Risk Committee on the risk assessment and proposed mitigation measures, as per Board Resolution dated 21 November 2013 https://features.icann.org/dns-risk-management-framework-report-and-implementation?language=fr, and any follow up arising from such briefings.
SSR1 Rec 25: What efforts have been made since 2014 to demonstrate that ICANNs risk management framework follows the standards of transparency and community participation, required by the SSR1?
SSR1 Rec 25: Please clarify whether the portfolio of the new VP of Enterprise Risk Management extends into risks relating to ICANN's role with regard to the internet's set of unique identifiers, and future threats relating to unique identifiers?
SSR1 Rec 25: Is there a final DNS risk assessment document (the linked to document is labelled 'draft') https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/dns-risk-consultation-28may14-en.pdf, and have there been any updates since 2014?
SSR1 Rec 1-20 General Question: What individual within the ICANN organization holds ultimate responsibility for implementation of SSR1 recommendations?
SSR1 Rec 1-20 General Question: How has the responsibility for implementation of SSR1 recommendations flowed down through the organization, in terms of ownership, deliverables, performance objectives, etc.?
SSR1 Rec 1-20 General Question: What mechanisms exist within the ICANN organization to provide regular (at least annual) reviews of SSR1 implementation, and to make appropriate adjustments to working practices and responsibilities?
SSR1 Rec 1-20 General Question: What measures of success have been adopted within the ICANN organization for implementation of SSR1 recommendations, and how has the community been involved in defining or reviewing such measures?
SSR1 Rec 1-20 General Question: How has the ICANN organization ensured that the implementation of SSR1 recommendations are embedded in standard operating procedures?
SSR1 Rec 1-20 General Question: The SSR1 Report includes check marks for due dates under “Status of Deliverables” and the accompanying text often does not contain completion dates. Please provide a “due date” and completion date for each deliverable.
SSR1 Rec 1: Since the version developed in 2012, what changes have been made to the SSR remit and technical mission statement? Who has made those changes? How has the community been allowed to review and comment on those changes? When were the last changes made to this statement?
SSR1 Rec 1: How are the definitions of security, stability and resiliency consistently carried through into key documents, such as strategic plans and agreements with contracted parties?
SSR1 Rec 2: Recommendation 2 directs that the definition of ICANN’s SSR remit and limited technical mission should be reviewed in order to maintain consensus and elicit feedback from the Community. Please provide details of reviews and community feedback that have occurred since 2013.
SSR1 Rec 4: What opportunities have there been for community input into the nature/definition of ICANN’s SSR relationships?
SSR1 Rec 6: What specific resourcing for RSSAC and SSAC appears in either the ICANN Operating Plan or the most recent budget?
SSR1 Rec 7: How are the objectives specific to the SSR Framework documented in either the Operating Plan or the Strategic Plan?
SSR1 Rec 7: Where are priorities for SSR activities and initiatives published?
SSR1 Rec 7: In what ways have pragmatic cost-benefit and risk analysis informed the choice of priorities (if any)?
146.59
COMPLETED ACTIONS/REQUESTS
Anticipated Completion Date*
DECISIONS
This section is under maintenance.