ページ履歴

...

6.         The GNSO Council thanks the DT for its collaborative effort, especially in view the limited time frame available to the DT.

2.         MOTION – Withdrawal Conditional participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization chartering organization for the Cross Community Working Group cross-community working group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN.

Made by: Darcy Southwell as amended

Seconded by: Paul McGrady

WHEREAS:a.        

1. The GNSO Council adopted the charter for a Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN and make recommendations to the chartering organization on these issues on 15 October 2014, and as such became a Chartering Organization.

...

1. The Charter foresees that

...

1. "At each ICANN Annual General Meeting, starting 2014, the Charter and deliverables of the WG shall be reviewed by the participating

...

1. SO's and AC's to determine whether the WG should continue, or, close and be dissolved. Consistent with ICANN community practices, the WG will continue if at least two of the participating

...

1. SO's or AC's extend the Charter of the WG and notify the other participating

...

1. SO's and AC's accordingly one month after the annual review

...

1. date".

...

1. The CWG-IG provided its first written status update on 23 June 2016 (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-governance-23jun16-en.pdf [gnso.icann.org]).

...

1. The GNSO Council recently adopted the

...

1. "Uniform Framework of Principles and Recommendations for Cross Community Working

...

1. Groups" (CWG Framework) which details the lifecycle of a CCWG

...

1. including initiation, formation, operation, decision-making, adoption of Final Report by Chartering Organizations and

...

1. closure of CCWG, and

...

1. post-closure of CCWG.

...

1. The GNSO Council has observed that the CWG-IG does not follow this lifecycle, nor has it established

...

1. or adopted an initial work plan and associated schedule as foreseen in its

...

1. Charter.

...

1. The GNSO Council recognizes the importance of a continued dialogue and discussion in relation to the topic of Internet Governance within an ICANN context.

g.         Withdrawal of the GNSO Council as a Chartering Organization does not prevent the CWG-IG to continue in its current format, if other ICANN SO/ACs continue their support as a Chartering Organization, or to continue in a different format such as a discussion group.

RESOLVED:

a.         The GNSO Council will not continue as a Chartering Organization for the CWG-IG and hereby withdraws itself as one of the Chartering Organizations.

...

1. The GNSO Council has shared its concerns with the ccNSO Council and representatives of other SO/ACs on the subject of this CWG and its future.

RESOLVED:

1. The GNSO Council will continue to participate as a Chartering Organization for the CWG-IG. However, this participation is conditioned upon a comprehensive review of the CWG-IG Charter by the CWG-IG, in accordance with the CWG Framework (http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf)[gnso.icann.org]. In particular, the GNSO Council expects future work to be subject to a clear work plan, with regular updates and clear deliverables.
2. The GNSO Council expects that the CWG-IG will present by ICANN58 a report on its findings, which may include a revised charter or a recommendation to reconstitute the group under a new structure.
3. Following the submission of the CWG-IG report, the GNSO Council will consider the recommendations and decide whether or not it will continue as a Chartering Organization.
4. The GNSO Secretariat will communicate this decision to the CWG-IG Chairs as well as the other Chartering

...

...

1. Organizations.
   
   

3. MOTION – Adoption of the Charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds

...