Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

    • Statement Guideline ( Eduardo)
    • Roles and Responsibilities (Lesley)
  1. AOB

Notes:

1. Welcome and Roll call

Agenda agreed

2. Workplan with teams (update/take stock) & Overview of updates ( included)

3. Wiki space for use by GRC ( Kim/Bart, see: https://community.icann.org/display/ccnsowkspc/Guidelines+Review+Committee

Comments of the group to be send to Kim

Who will keep the wiki up to date? Initially it will be the secretariat, but also give ability to keep team leaders

Comments: Change title first 3 documents in document section

Refine names of documents included

 

Kim to check permissions wiki space ( part of pages)

If possible provide permission to team  leads

 

4. Progress teams 

o ccNSO Meeting Guideline & Update Program WG charter 

Add not an offical 

Informal, non-binding "sense of the mood"

 

Change colours as described in document ( if at all) 

Record handing out

 

ccTLD preferences during ccNSO meetings

 

Action Bart  to clarify section 4.1

 

o Statement Guideline ( Eduardo)

Guideline as it stands one major issue: the meaning of the term “significant support” 

Resolve on the basis of no-objection I.e include mechanism in Guideline on how to deal with objections against final draft. 

Related question is also whether the ccNSO Council could provide a statement by themselves if there is objection from members?

Eduardo: wait for comments or start drafting?

Potential mechanism could be to include mechanisms to allow for minority views ( objection). Note objection of a small minority should not introduce a de-facto veto for a statement.

Action: Eduardo and Bart to propose mechanisms  to deal with objections

 

o Roles and Responsibilities (Lesley)

Add langauge to guideline

Staff: add latest version as starting point/document

 

5. AOB

No remarks

Chat Transcript:

Bart Boswinkel:Hi all

...