Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

 Made by: Susan Kawaguchi

Seconded by: Carlos Raúl Gutierrez

WHEREAS

 

  1. Following submission of the WHOIS Policy Review Team’s Final Report, the ICANN Board passed a resolution on 8 November, 2012, launching an Expert Working Group on gTLD Registration Directory Services (EWG) to (1) help redefine the purpose of gTLD registration data and consider how to safeguard the data, and (2) propose a model for gTLD registration directory services to address accuracy, privacy, and access issues.
  2. Upon publication of the EWG’s Final Report in June, 2014, an informal group of Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Councilors and ICANN Board members collaborated to propose a Process Framework for structuring a GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) to successfully address these challenging issues.
  3. On 26 May, 2015, the ICANN Board adopted that Process Framework and reaffirmed its 2012 request for a Board-initiated PDP to define the purpose of collecting, maintaining and providing access to gTLD registration data, and to consider safeguards for protecting data, using the recommendations in the EWG’s Final Report as an input to, and, if appropriate, as the foundation for a new gTLD policy.
  4. In accordance with the PDP Rules, a new Preliminary Issue Report was published for public comment on 13 July 2015. Following review of the public comments received, the Staff Manager updated the Issue Report accordingly and included a summary of the comments received (see Annex D), which was submitted as the Final Issue Report to the GNSO Council for its consideration.
  5. The GNSO Council has reviewed the issues raised in the Final Issue Report as well as the draft PDP Working Group Charter that was included in the Preliminary Issue Report and updated reflecting the input received in the Final Issue Report final-issue-report-next-generation-rds-07oct15-en.pdf

...

  1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter and appoints Susan Kawaguchi as the GNSO Council liaison to the Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS (Next-Gen RDS) PDP WG;
  2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the PDP WG no later than ten days after the approval of this motion but the call for volunteers should remain open until the WG convenes for the first time; and
  3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair(s) for the WG and that chair(s) is confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve as the interim chair.

3. LATE MOTION   Process and Participation in CCWG-Accountability

Made by: Avri Doria
Seconded by: Heather Forrest

Whereas 

On 13 November 2014 the GNSO approved the charter for a Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-AccountabiltyAccountability);
On  3 August the
On  3 August the Public Comment on the CCWG-Accountability 2nd Draft 2ndDraft Proposal was initiated, which ended on 12 Septemebr September 2015;

The CCWG-Accountabilty Accountability has analyzed the comments received in the review of the 2nd draft and is working toward updating its reference
implementation taking into account the concerns expressed in those comments;

and The CCWG-Accountabilty  is Accountability  is working in a considered and collegial manner to achieve a consensus solution to ICANN Accountability;

Acknowledging

the superb and continuing leadership of CCWG-Accountabilty Accountability by the team which includes the GNSO appointed co-chair Thomas Rickert, to whom we
are grateful for his time and consistent effort;


Resolved

The GNSO reiterates its support for the process that is ongoing in CCWG-Accountability,

its commitment to participating in continuing discussions with the goal of finding solution solutions with broad agreement for ICANN accountabity accountability in preparations
preparation for IANA transition, and
and
to working through the process as agreed upon in the charter before making any resolutions declaring support or opposition to possible outcomes.