AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
ページ履歴
| Comment Close Date | Statement Name | Status | Assignee(s) | Call for Comments Open | Call for Comments Close | Vote Announcement | Vote Open | Vote Reminder | Vote Close | Date of Submission | Staff Contact and Email | Statement Number | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01.07.2014 | FY15 Operating Plan & Budget |
| Tijani Ben Jemaa | 04.07.2014 | 10.07.2014 23:59 UTC | 11.07.2014 23:59 UTC | 11.07.2014 23:59 UTC | 17.07.2014 | 18.07.2014 23:59 UTC | 11.07.2014 | Xavier Calvez controller@icann.org TBC | AL-ALAC-ST-0714-01-01-EN |
FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED
The final version to be submitted, if the draft is ratified, will be placed here by upon completion of the vote. Please click here to download a copy of the pdf below.
|
...
FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC
ALAC Statement on the Draft FY15 Operating plan Plan and Budget
The At-Large Advisory Committee ALAC finds the draft operating plan and budget Draft FY15 Operating Plan and Budget well designed and presented in a comprehensive way.
Nevertheless, the ALAC wants wishes to highlight express the following pointsobservations and questions:
1.1.2 Revenue assumptions
- New Registries assumption: The 33 million registrations in FY15 seem optimistic; how was it this figure calculated?
1.4 Statement of Activities
- What you call “depreciation "Depreciation expenses” in the Operating Expenses is are explained on the same page by “Impact as the “impact of FY14 capital investments (Salesforce.com, Digital Platform, website, etc.)”. How can these Please be so kind to clarify how these can be depreciation expenses?
...
- In the “support & revenue”, the increase in “GSE/Gov.Eng./Public Resp” is 3$3.7 M$. how can this 7M. Please be so kind to clarify how this can represent 117.2%?
- The YOY operating expenses growth doesn’t take into consideration appears to be taking neither the USG transition (B) nor the other priority areas (C) into consideration.
1.7 Risks and Opportunities to the FY15 Budget
- After more than a full year of experience, It’s easy to predict predicting the number of new registry registries for FY15 is a simple exercise. Thus, the risk of a slower ramp up of registries couldn’t could not be high; however, while if the number of registrations is absolutely unknown, leading it will lead to a higher risk.
3.1 New gTLD financial summary
- The increase of the expenses is explained inter alias alia by the additional ICANN staff allocation (+$11.6M for the whole program). But the However, ICANN staff expenses are costs appear to be also counted in the normal ICANN budget out of , under the new gTLD partsection. If it this is not a duplication, and those staff expenses were subtracted from the normal ICANN budget, it should be clearly mentioned.
3.1 New gTLD financial summary / 3.4. New gTLD Program – Operating Expenses Variance Analysis
- For FY13, there should not be any difference between the Apr April 2014 and the June 2013 estimations since June 2013 is the end of FY13 and the with figures that are not estimation estimations but actual value values.
The At-Large Advisory Committee ALAC hopes that the planning process will be improved for FY16, as ICANN now that we have has a strategic plan. The After this year's again shortened cycle, the interaction with the community should be drastically significantly improved so that the remarks of the community may impact the final plan and budget.
...
- For FY13, there should not be any difference between the Apr April 2014 and the June 2013 estimations since June 2013 is the end of FY13 and the figures are not estimation but actual value
...
