Page History
...
Include review Action List.
Comments or questions arising.
Item 3: Consent agenda (
...
0 mins)
[Confirmation of the NCPH election of Board Seat 14]
Item 4: DISCUSSION – GNSO Council advice regarding Specification 13 of the new gTLD registry agreement (15 mins)
Discussions and activity relating to the Internet governance ecosystem are attracting a great deal of attention. This item is on the Council’s agenda in order to provide an opportunity for discussion within the Council about how this impacts the role and work of the Council and mindful of the scope and remit of the Council, what action the Council should or could be taking. In addition, the transition of stewardship of the IANA function from the US government is now firmly on the GNSO’s agenda and the Council must determine its role and function with respect to this.
Registry Agreement and the proposed incorporation of an additional clause (20 mins)
The ICANN new gTLD Programme Committee (NGPC) has approved Specification 13 to the New gTLD Registry Agreement, see link. However, this does not currently include a proposed clause allowing a so-called .Brand registry operator to designate a limited number preferred registrars for the TLD.
The NGPC has approved the incorporation of the additional proposed clause (allowing a .Brand registry operator to designate a limited number of preferred registrars) but its implementation will not take effect until 45 days from the publication of this resolution in order to:
(i) provide the GNSO Council with an opportunity to advise ICANN as to whether the GNSO Council believes that this additional provision is inconsistent with the letter and intent of GNSO Policy Recommendation 19 on the Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains;
OR
(ii) advise ICANN that the GNSO Council needs additional time for review, including an explanation as to why additional time is required.
In this item, the Council will receive background information in order to fully inform the discussion and to plan the next steps.
4.1 - Background
4.2 - Discussion
48.1 - Background
8.2 - Discussion
8.2 - Next steps
Item 5: DISCUSSION – Internet Governance Issues (15 20 mins)
The transition of stewardship of the IANA function from the US government is now firmly on the GNSO’s agenda and the Council must determine its role and function with respect to this. In this .
8item, the Council will take the opportunity to pick up from the meeting in Singapore, including inputs into the public forum on Thursday and decide on any next steps.
5.1 - Discussion
8 5.2 - Next steps
Item 6: Any Other Business (10 15 mins)
6.1 Submission of Council input to the call for Public Comment on ICANN Strategy Panels – Draft Reports
6.2 Submission of Council input to the call for Public Comment on ICANN Future Meetings Strategy
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
...
New York/Washington DC, USA (EDT) UTC-4+0DST 10:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+0DST 11:00
Montevideo, Uruguay (UYST) UTC-3+0DST 11:00
Buenos Aires, Argentina (ART) UTC-3+0DST 11:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 15:00
Bonn, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 16:00
Stockholm, Sweden (CET) UTC+1+0DST 16:00
Cairo, Egypt, (EET) UTC+2+0DST 16:00
Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+2+0DST 17:00
Ramat Hasharon, Israel(IST) UTC+2+0DST 17:00
Beijing/Hong Kong, China/Singapore (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 22:00
Perth, Australia (WST) UTC+8+0DST 22:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DST starts/ends on last Sunday of March 2014, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com
