AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
| Meeting | Date and Time | Assignee and RALO | Report | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Women Breakfast | Monday 15 | Sylvia Herlein - LACRALO | DNS Women again showed their strength, convening more than 70 women from the various components of the industry, governments and civil society in the internet related in traditional breakfast on Mondays. It was announced the launch for ( next week) July 21st, 2013 del site http://www.dnswomen.org/ but if you want more information can be found in http://www.facebook.com/groups/Dnswomen/ | |||
| ALAC Meetings | Sunday14 | Glenn McKnight-NARALO | A very interesting comment by Steve Crocker today on the hard work of ALAC , his comments were recorded and posted to the website
Pictures of the ICANN ALAC Meetings, GNSO, NCUC and more i | |||
| Wed to Fri 13 | Glenn McKnight-NARALO | Various NCUC short video clips at the 1st School of African Internet Governance Just to get short NCUC clips up to Youtube quickly I have posted two short clips One from Bill Drake and another by Wolfgang | ||||
| Sun. 14 | Glenn McKnight-NARALO | Presentation by Dev on LUCID MEETING as an effective tool for meetings http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisGift/lucid-meetingscommittees-tech Video pending on Youtube Dev Anand Teelucksingh
| ||||
| Sun 14 | Glenn McKnight-NARALO | Livestreaming the ISOC event tonight http://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/isocaticann47 Pictures of event posted to Flickr The event was two hours long and well attended by ISOC members around the World. The outgoing Chair had interesting comments Animoto video clip http://animoto.com/play/b7jbcXEYEx2YwAWCzTXdqQ
| ||||
| Mon 15 | Glenn McKnight | DNS and Women Pictures and Videos taken of event | ||||
| Mon 15 | Glenn McKnight | Online Learning Platform Discussion of the ICANN Academy, discussion on proceeding on the platform Speak to Siva or myself about the MOODLE which was created 1 -1/2 year ago
| ||||
| Mon 15 | Glenn | Nomcom meetings for rest of day and meeting the ATRT2 group reviewing the stock of questions for NOMCOM, session chaired by Brian of PRI | ||||
Meeting Strategy Working Group | Mon 15 13:30 - 15:00 | Sylvia Herlein & Eduardo Díaz | We had a very successful brainstorming meeting. Many ideas were generated in relation to ways of structuring future ICANN meetings. X Plane consultors helped facilitate the meeting. | |||
ICANN Press Conference | Mon 15 16:30 - 17:30 | Eduardo Díaz | I was invited to participate in this event as one of the observers of the Meeting Strategy Working Group. Present at the conference were: Dr. Stephen Crocker, Fadi Chehadé, Dr. Nii Quaynor and Peter Dandjinou. | |||
| BOARD and ALAC | 9 am | Glenn M | Photos taken at meeting and working group reports to board. Amazing dialogue between Steve Crocker and Fadi surprized everyone as to it's frankness and directness. It was encouraging to hear the commitment to the stakeholder involvement It was refreshing to hear to honesty and encouraging for ALAC Only photo regretfully | |||
| 11 | Glenn | ccNSO Presentation on finances of ccnSO by Bryon Holland Photos and video | ||||
| 12 | Glenn | Presentations by Nomcom Participated from the NARALO representative as to future training of NOMCOM reps | ||||
| 2 | Glenn | Presentation by ALAC Chairs Garth's presentation emphasized the three issues. Aboriginal Internet Access, Digital Rights of the Disabled and Privacy Issues Video posted Youtube | ||||
Monday, 15 July 2013 14:00- 16:00 | Garth | Excellent presentation by Karaitiana Taiuru on Indigenous Groups’ Perspective | ||||
| ATRT2 meeting with the SSAC | Mon, 15 July 2013 07:30 - 08:30 | Dev Anand Teelucksingh | SSAC members commented on the ATRT2 questions Lot of discussion on Q1 (whether GNSO PDP is effective for developing gTLD policy) SSAC chair mentioned that an issue is that it is silo based rather than topic based, and that cross constituency input/deliberations on issues don't happen or happens too late whereever the process is being developed. Examples of possible issues : new gTLDs, IDN ccTLD Fast Track Steve Crocker mentioned a report just published on the internal SSAC list on the issue of conflict of names used on internal networks being This issue was mentioned by SSAC that such research was needed at the time of the initial root scaling survey for new gTLDs but was not done until now. Why did this take so long from a ATRT perspective? Alan noted that cross community deliberations is mentioned in the AoC but not done by ICANN AC/SOs Lyman C - when community centred processes such as GNSO PDP, in spite of cross-community and talking to to other ACs and SOs, there is a tendency by the AC/SO to complete the work internally. perhaps there needs to be mechanisms in the AC/SO PDP processes that requires input by other AC/SO groups before any AC/SO can publish reports.
SSAC chair mentioned that the SSAC has not ever been blocked/held back by ICANN legal to publish their reports. Reports may not be published as scheduled if there is not encough consensus. Discussion on SSAC Accountability and Transparency -
| |||
| NOMCOM | ALL DAY | Glenn McKnight | We are doing extensive deep dives and interviews with ICANN Board candidates. Very interesting candidates. Excellent candidates for the new board We are working all day and tomorrow on interviews and Friday and Saturday is the selection process | |||
| NARALO | General | Garth Bruen | In addition to our meeting I am helping coordinate our regional elections with staff | |||
| ALAC/NCSG | 12:30-14:00 | Natalia Enciso | Themes: 1. Joint Statement in TMCH in Beijing. 2. Request to return friday meetings. 1.The concern is the process. The real problem is that process that was follow by the CEO to gather a few people in a room without proper stakeholder participation, Not in complete agreement with the people that did participate in that process. The board approve the TMCH+50. You get to block 50 other names. The board ignore the request. The independent review process costs millions of dollars. Follow thorug the Community engagemente process. File an independent review process. Ask Icann to funding in the same way they are funding ALAC independent process. The CEO is restructuring the whole organization. Take a stand that this is a very crucial component. The creation of a division of implementation of a gold that is free of the stakeholder process, is problematic. We are going to isolate part of the process from the mulstistakholder model. It is the whole mulstistakeholder process that is being threaten by creating isolating division. The presidential committee that set the roadmap is another problem./ would like to see more information about how this is going to work. Understood is an operational part of ICANN. Contractual work. Ask the Board and FAdi and tema to produce a document that clearly define the work. The channel and bridges that connect. / have alarm bells ringing. / The MS is a complete work of ICANN, not a segment a ICANN. We are Icann. Alac can give advice on anything./ Be vigilant./ Say in the public forum. Joint statement, proper engagement process procedure. / Whish to first see evidence before raising a flag. / Produce a joint statement. /Alac have to take it back to other members. Statement that might have come from the alac in the future, asking for documents. | |||
