Versions Compared


  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Please note that this wiki space is the work space of the PDP WG, the authoritative space for all relevant resolutions, work documents, and tracking of progress, please consult the Project Page on  


This is the home of the non-PDP Metrics and Reporting Data & Metrics for Policy Making (DMPM) Working Group space. To help you on your way, we've inserted some of our favourite favorite macros on this home page. As you start creating pages, blogging and commenting you'll see the macros below fill up with all the activity in your space.


In The 2010 , the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAPWG) identified in its Final Report the 'need the Meta Issue: Uniformity of Reporting which it described as “need for more uniformity in the mechanisms to initiate, track, and analyze policy-violation reports'.  ”  The RAPWG as a result recommended in its Final Report that 'the “the GNSO and the larger ICANN community in general, create and support uniform problem-reporting and report-tracking processes'.  The GNSO in collaboration with the community and ICANN Contractual Compliance deliberated the issues through due diligence analysis, a review of current state compliance reporting systems, and future state implementation plans within ICANN.  Based on the information gathered, the GNSO ” 

The GNSO Council recommended the creation of an Issue Report to further research metrics and reporting needs in hopes to better aid improve the policy development process.  The report created by ICANN Staff further outlined accomplishments regarding reporting and metrics for by the Contractual Compliance function and it also reviewed other reporting sources that may be of relevance.  On 9 May 2013, the GNSO Council approved the report’s recommendations to await any further action regarding Contractual Compliance metrics and reporting until the conclusion of their three-year plan towards the end of 2013.  At such time the GNSO Council will consider other actions, if any. In the meantime, the GNSO Council also The GNSO Council subsequently adopted the recommendation to form this non-PDP Working Group tasked with exploring opportunities of for developing reporting and metrics recommendations processes and/or appropriate standardized methodologies that could better inform policy development via fact-based policy development and decision making, where applicable.  An availability review of both ICANN internal and external data sources is expected to be performed to help inform the deliberations of this non-PDP Working Group..   The GNSO resolution states:


The GNSO Council does not initiate a Policy Development Process at this stage but will review at the completion of the ICANN Contractual Compliance three-year plan expected for 31 December 2013 whether additional action is required;

The GNSO Council further approves the creation of a drafting team to develop a charter for a non-PDP Working Group to consider additional methods for collecting necessary metrics and reporting from Contracted Parties and other external resources to aid the investigation.

Recently Updated

Navigate space

Page Tree Search

Page Tree