Page History
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member | Info | Additional Notes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GNSO Prioritization
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PDP3.0 Final Report | Non-registry GNSO Liaison to the Customer Standing Committee
|
|
| GNSO Input to the Independent Review Process Standing Panel
|
|
| k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak RPM Charter amendments
|
|
| k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak Mary Wong Julie Hedlund Ariel Liang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Managing IDN Variants TLDs
|
|
| CSC Effectiveness Review Final Report
|
| Council and the Chair of ccNSO Council are requested to recommend report to IANA Naming Function Review Team (IFRT) as soon as that is established.
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance |
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- SCBO to do analysis between ccNSO/GNSO comments, identify elements for common cause. Look at how the reserve fund replenishment can be sustained.
PDP update: discussion of SubPro progress
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Council leadership to propose path forward to obtain clarification / provide view concerning intersection between the Name Collisions Analysis Project and SubPro PDP
Rafik Dammak Pam Little k drazek
IFR team Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Once the Council receives the receipt for IFR membership confirmation, Council to consider how best to coordinate co-chair selection with ccNSO, which will be responsible for selecting the ccNSO co-chair.
- Council to consider selection process by which a GNSO appointed member of the IANA Function Review (IFR) team will be selected to serve as the GNSO co-chair on the IFR as the ICANN Bylaws stipulate that “(d) The IFRT shall be led by two co-chairs: one appointed by the GNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (c)-(f) of Section 18.7 and one appointed by the ccNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (a)-(b) of Section 18.7” once the IFR membership has been confirmed.
- IANA Function Review (IFR) Team composition: Review of the ccNSO proposal to manage deficiencies - Councilors to take discussion on ccNSO proposal (here: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2019-January/022175.html) to their respective SG/C and to then consider what input they would like to provide.
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Staff to investigate the anticipated timing, funding and expected deliverables for the Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance project.
- ICANN staff to invite Brian Cute to a future Council meeting
- Rafik Dammak to invite Brian Cute to future PDP 3.0 meeting to make sure to not create overlapping work on the Evolution of the MSM
- PDP3.0 small team to draft response to Public Comment and submit to Council for review. Consider inviting Brian once the Public Comment closes.
- GNSO Council to organize a community sharing session about PDP 3.0 implementation work that aligns with the MSM evolution project before or during ICANN68 (specific timing/format TBD)
EPDP 2 team request for input on data accuracy
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Keith Drazek to send an email to the GNSO Council mailing list regarding the possible next steps regarding the data accuracy issue, with the aim to provide a response to the EPDP Team by Friday, 13 March
New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Project Change Request
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- GNSO Council to provide feedback with regard to the SubPro PCR on list for one week (till 27 February 2020), which should help inform the GNSO Council decision on whether to approve the PCR. Keith to send a reminder on the Council list.
Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs PDP Project Change Request
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- GNSO Council to provide feedback with regard to the RPM PCR on list for one week (till 27 February 2020), which should help inform the GNSO Council decision on whether to approve the PCR. Keith to send a reminder on the Council list.
ICANN67
- Drafting team members to share draft charter and identified questions in charter with respective SG/Cs for feedback, following which the drafting team will review this input and finalize the charter for GNSO Council consideration.
- Council to consider adoption of charter at its upcoming meeting
- Call for volunteers to be delayed at least until the EPDP hits the milestone of publishing its Initial Report. Council to discuss this topic once that milestone is hit.
- ICANN Staff to circulate a call for volunteers (subsequent to the initiation and chartering process for the EPDP on the Temporary Specification) to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups, with the request for each Stakeholder Group to appoint up to 3 members to the Implementation Advisory Group (IAG). The call for volunteers should also be more widely circulated to seek volunteers to serve as participants and observers to the IAG.
- Council leadership to research and develop guidance for if and when the work on the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy should begin.
Michele Neylon Paul McGrady k drazek Stephanie Perrin Pam Little
Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine
Legislative Tracker
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Small group of Councilors to develop draft message to ICANN Org to provide input on legislative tracker. Based on feedback, Council leadership to consider scheduling follow up discussion at ICANN65.
- Global Engagement to take into account feedback, in particular, inclusion of rationale for including a piece of legislation on the legal / regulatory tracker.
Pam Little k drazek Rafik Dammak
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Council to further consider next steps in relation to the review of the Transfer Policy which would result in providing GDD information/response on expected next steps and/or seek additional information as the Council considers how to approach the Transfer Policy review, for example, holistically instead of piecemeal.
- Rubens Kuhl, as Council liaison, to reach out to the IRT for the EPDP Phase 1 to have a conversation and gain a better understanding of how to address recommendation 24 and the Form of Authorization issue stemming from the Temporary Specification.
- Council to determine next steps for the Transfer Policy, which could include the chartering of a narrowly focused EPDP
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak
IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Susan Kawaguchi to collaborate with the PDP WG and staff to develop a draft final report for preliminary consideration by the GNSO Council (targeting May meeting).
- ICANN staff to inform the IGO-INGO CRP PDP WG that the GNSO Council resolved that the Working Group, in line with the Council’s priority to ensure responsible allocation of resources and timely management of the PDP, the Final Report be submitted in time to meet the July 2018 GNSO Council meeting document deadline.
- Councilors to review Final Report, especially in the broader context of the appropriate overall scope of protection for all IGO identifiers, in preparation for consideration as early as the August Council meeting.
- ICANN staff to inform the ICANN Board and the GAC that the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Mechanisms PDP Working Group has completed its work and forward a copy of the Final Report to them
- Councilors to review Final Report and options flowchart, then prepare a list of questions by 31 August 2018 that they have, for response by the WG leadership, WG liaison, WG members, or staff as appropriate.
- ICANN staff to work with the GNSO Chair and Council liaison to determine possible ways to address concerns regarding some of the PDP recommendations within the scope of the PDP Manual, in light of the fact that the WG has not identified any recommendations as being interdependent.
- Next steps for the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP WG Final Report - ICANN staff to schedule webinar for questions and answers
- Council leadership/staff to develop a summary document to capture concerns and issues with the PDP, as well as next step options available to the Council
- Council leadership to again present Council options for the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Final Report to consider and discuss with their respective SG/Cs.
- Council leadership and Council to continue developing proposed path forward for the Working Group’s Final Report.
- Councilors to review the materials for the webinar held on 09 October 2019 (available here: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar/2018#oct) and other materials shared for the agenda item (here: https://community.icann.org/x/JIoWBg)
- Council Leadership to consider repurposing the extraordinary meeting on 14 February 2019 to discuss IGO/INGO Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms if the EPDP Final Report is not yet available for discussion and review.
- Council leadership to develop a new options document to include proposed motion language for each option for Council consideration.
- Council leadership to follow up on existing action item regarding expected report from Heather Forrest and Susan Kawaguchi on process management for the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms.
- GNSO Chair to prepare communication to GAC/IGOs to explain rationale for vote and demonstrate how they will be able to participate.
- Staff to communicate the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP Recommendations Report to ICANN Board Operations.
Rafik Dammak k drazek Pam Little
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council leadership and staff to schedule an extraordinary Council meeting to discuss the Board adoption of the EPDP policy recommendationsCouncilors who were unable to attend the pre ICANN67 GNSO Policy Update webinar to listen to the recording of the session prior to the week of ICANN67 (week of 9 March). Keith to send a reminder to the Council list.
CCWG on New gTLD Auction Proceeds
Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
...
|
2020 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|
The role and responsibilities of |
- Council to consider whether existing mechanisms provide for sufficient opportunity to conduct “emergency” consultations to allow for GNSO Chair to gather input on certain topics and/or decisions that need to be taken.
- Council members to provide leadership team with feedback on leadership team’s performance & actions on a regular basis.
- Current Council Chair (Heather Forrest) to provide report at the end of her term outlining main challenges / concerns / recommendations in fulfilling the role.
- Council to consider whether Council leadership should have a contract / letter of appointment that would outline role, responsibilities and expectations.
- Council leadership to reach out to SG/C leadership to notify them of the changes made to the GNSO Operating Procedures and the requirements for SG/Cs to develop supporting procedures and processes.
- Staff to work on first draft of templates for motions related to EC powers as highlighted in the staff report (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-revisionsgnso-op-procedures-bylaws-staff-report-16may17-en.pdf).
the GNSO Council as a member of the Empowered Community
|
|
| ||||||||
PDP3.0 Improvements
|
|
| ||||||||
SPS Survey
|
|
|
- Donna Austin to share comments on scheduling of cross-community discussions with the GNSO Council.
- Staff to keep project timing planning document up to date and share it with the Council prior to every ICANN meeting to facilitate review and oversight of timelines. Explore whether there is a more dynamic way in which the document can be publicly shared.
- Council leadership to reach out to leadership of Curative Rights and Reconvened WG on RCRC to see whether it is feasible to deliver Final Reports within 6-month timeframe.
- Council leadership to notify ICANN Board with regards to PDPs that are expected to deliver to finalize their report shortly so that concerns or issues can be raised prior to GNSO Council consideration.
- Council leadership to request update from GNSO-appointed members to RDS Review Team at upcoming GNSO Council meeting.
- Council to explore mechanisms and tools for monitoring / reviewing costs related to PDP WGs with a view to improving efficiency and effectiveness
2019 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|
- Council leadership team to send “thank you” note to Becky Burr for her presentation and James Bladel for his facilitation assistance.
- Council to seek to map out timing elements for utilizing the nine powers held by the EC. Consider if and how an emergency community consultation mechanism can be integrated. (Note: the GNSO Bylaws Drafting Team is in the midst of addressing this item. Target for delivery date is post-ICANN65)
- Council to go through examples/scenarios to see how the EC powers can be utilized. This should include going down into the SG/C level of detail. (see DT Timeline and Background Documents)
Role and responsibilities of GNSO more broadly |
|
|
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Staff to prepare a comparison table for the proposed Working Group models, which could include several factors: membership eligibility, operating procedures, decision-making, communicating decision-making, urgency/timing (e.g., prioritization). Consider creating pros/cons as well.
PDP 3.0 - Sub-group presentation and wrap-up
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Small group of Councilors to continue work of the sub-groups to make specific PDP 3.0 implementation recommendations. Council to agree to working methods. (Action Item taken on board by the PDP 3.0 small team)
Role and responsibilities of Council Liaisons
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council to consider whether Consensus Policy Implementation Framework (CPIF) needs to be reevaluated as it relates to guidance for Council liaisons to IRTs, avoiding relitigation of policy issues, and escalation of issues (noting that the Policy & Implementation recommendations adopted in 2015 state that the recommendations, including the CPIF, should be evaluated after at most 5 years). (Action Item taken on board by the PDP 3.0 small team)
- Council to consider options for enhancing the WG participation model, including terms for participation that members must agree to. (Action Item taken on board by the PDP 3.0 small team)
How to manage Council’s 2019 workload: strategies to increase effectiveness |
|
- As part of PDP 3.0, Council to establish PDPs Chair(s)/ liaisons communication / reporting timelines and requirements to Council.
- Council to consider adding request for website upgrade to the Council comment to the FY20 budget.
- Council to consider how to better understand the specific resourcing needs of PDP WGs (e.g., SCBO to meet with PDP leadership in August of every year).
Lunch with the Board
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
|
- Council leadership to get Council input on the Board initiatives for discussion in Kobe.
Wrap up and close of session |
|
2018 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Role and responsibilities of Council leadership |
|
Other Council Related Action Items
...
Topic | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominating Committee (NomCom) Review Implementation Planning Team (IPT).
|
|
| Steve Chan |