Page History
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member | | Info | Additional Notes |
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Council to convene a small drafting team to formulate a response to the public comment period.
- Council leadership to send letter to the ICANN Board.
- Council leadership to send letter to ICANN Board.
- PDP 3.0 team to consider how input from outside the GNSO can be solicited.
- Small team to take into account councilor feedback (e.g., language about new recommendations superseding recommendations 1-4, ensuring technical expertise is available) and complete revised draft to be sent to the GAC/IGOs for their review.
- Council to convene a small focused drafting team (e.g., like the IDN Scoping Team) to review several items, including at least the review of the ICANN Policy Status Report, considering the possibility of policy development mechanisms, and the form of authorization (FOA) issues.
- Councilors to review and send comments, if applicable, by 26 September.
- Council leadership to subsequently send response to the ICANN Board, shortly thereafter
Confirmation of volunteers for Council liaisons to PDP/IRTs
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- If applicable, Councilors to ask questions or note objections by 28 August.
- Subsequently, ICANN Staff to facilitate handover meetings between incoming and outgoing liaisons, as well as PDP/IRT leadership.
Proposed amendments to CPIF
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Councilors to ensure that their respective SG/Cs are aware that they are able to provide input to ICANN Org by 25 October 2019 at the latest. To the extent the Council can agree on any unified feedback, Council to provide written input by 25 October as well.
- Pam Little to share proposed edits from the RrSG with the Council.
Legislative Tracker
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Small group of Councilors to develop draft message to ICANN Org to provide input on legislative tracker. Based on feedback, Council leadership to consider scheduling follow up discussion at ICANN65.
- ICANN Staff to follow up with GSE staff about input from GNSO Council on the legislative tracker (i.e., Global Engagement to take into account feedback, in particular, inclusion of rationale for including a piece of legislation on the legal / regulatory tracker.)
CSC Effectiveness Review Final Report
| Status | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- In accordance with terms of the CSC Effectiveness Review Template, the Chair of GNSO Council and the Chair of ccNSO Council are requested to recommend report to IANA Naming Function Review Team (IFRT) as soon as that is established.
- The GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Secretariat to share the results of this motion with the CSC.
Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of
- Susan Kawaguchi to collaborate with the PDP WG and staff to develop a draft final report for preliminary consideration by the GNSO Council (targeting May meeting).
- ICANN staff to inform the IGO-INGO CRP PDP WG that the GNSO Council resolved that the Working Group, in line with the Council’s priority to ensure responsible allocation of resources and timely management of the PDP, the Final Report be submitted in time to meet the July 2018 GNSO Council meeting document deadline.
- Councilors to review Final Report, especially in the broader context of the appropriate overall scope of protection for all IGO identifiers, in preparation for consideration as early as the August Council meeting.
- ICANN staff to inform the ICANN Board and the GAC that the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Mechanisms PDP Working Group has completed its work and forward a copy of the Final Report to them
- Councilors to review Final Report and options flowchart, then prepare a list of questions by 31 August 2018 that they have, for response by the WG leadership, WG liaison, WG members, or staff as appropriate.
- ICANN staff to work with the GNSO Chair and Council liaison to determine possible ways to address concerns regarding some of the PDP recommendations within the scope of the PDP Manual, in light of the fact that the WG has not identified any recommendations as being interdependent.
- Next steps for the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP WG Final Report - ICANN staff to schedule webinar for questions and answers
- Council leadership/staff to develop a summary document to capture concerns and issues with the PDP, as well as next step options available to the Council
- Council leadership to again present Council options for the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Final Report to consider and discuss with their respective SG/Cs.
- Council leadership and Council to continue developing proposed path forward for the Working Group’s Final Report.
- Councilors to review the materials for the webinar held on 09 October 2019 (available here: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar/2018#oct) and other materials shared for the agenda item (here: https://community.icann.org/x/JIoWBg)
- Council Leadership to consider repurposing the extraordinary meeting on 14 February 2019 to discuss IGO/INGO Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms if the EPDP Final Report is not yet available for discussion and review.
Rafik Dammak k drazek Pam Little
Updated Charter for the Cross Community Engagement Group on InternetGovernance
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Staff to investigate the anticipated timing, funding and expected deliverables for the Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance project.
- ICANN staff to invite Brian Cute to a future Council meeting
- Rafik Dammak to invite Brian Cute to future PDP 3.0 meeting to make sure to not create overlapping work on the Evolution of the MSM
- PDP3.0 small team to draft response to Public Comment and submit to Council for review. Consider inviting Brian once the Public Comment closes.
- If applicable, ccNSO and GNSO to form joint team to identify any commonalities or differences. Also look at budget and 5 year strategic plan.
PDP updates
- GNSO Council Liaison to the ccNSO to coordinate with the Country Codes Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) as the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance seeks to resolve concerns identified by the ccNSO Council.
- Council leadership to propose Council position and next steps for GNSO relationship with the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance
Rafik Dammak k drazek Pam Little Philippe Fouquart
IFR teamStatus colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council to consider selection process by which a GNSO appointed member of the IANA Function Review (IFR) team will be selected to serve as the GNSO co-chair on the IFR as the ICANN Bylaws stipulate that “(d) The IFRT shall be led by two co-chairs: one appointed by the GNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (c)-(f) of Section 18.7 and one appointed by the ccNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (a)-(b) of Section 18.7” once the IFR membership has been confirmed.
- IANA Function Review (IFR) Team composition: Review of the ccNSO proposal to manage deficiencies - Councilors to take discussion on ccNSO proposal (here: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2019-January/022175.html) to their respective SG/C and to then consider what input they would like to provide.
Drafting Team on charter related to the next steps for the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- GNSO Council, after having considered the 1 August letter from Akram Atallah and receiving a brief update from GDD on its 24 August Council meeting, should determine next steps for reviewing the Whois Procedure.
- Drafting team members to share draft charter and identified questions in charter with respective SG/Cs for feedback, following which the drafting team will review this input and finalize the charter for GNSO Council consideration.
- Council to consider adoption of charter at its upcoming meeting
- Call for volunteers to be delayed at least until the EPDP hits the milestone of publishing its Initial Report. Council to discuss this topic once that milestone is hit.
- ICANN Staff to circulate a call for volunteers (subsequent to the initiation and chartering process for the EPDP on the Temporary Specification) to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups, with the request for each Stakeholder Group to appoint up to 3 members to the Implementation Advisory Group (IAG). The call for volunteers should also be more widely circulated to seek volunteers to serve as participants and observers to the IAG.
- Council leadership to research and develop guidance for if and when the work on the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy should begin.
Michele Neylon Paul McGrady k drazek Stephanie Perrin Pam Little
Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine
EPDP FInal Report
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council leadership to propose ways to balance informal implementation of EPDP recommendations and phase 2 workload.
- EPDP Team to package legal questions/answers and the updated Final Report with consensus level designation of each recommendation for review by the Council.
- Councilors to engage with and consult with their Stakeholder Group / Constituency and ensure their respective communities understand current status and have provided instructions on how to vote for the EPDP Team Final Report on 4 March (where applicable)
- Rafik Dammak to inform the EPDP Team of decision to defer the vote and explain next steps
- ICANN Staff to inform GDD that the GNSO Council directs ICANN Org to informally convene the Implementation Review team for the EPDP as soon as possible.
- ICANN Staff to prepare the draft recommendations report for the ICANN Board, to be considered and adopted by the GNSO Council.
k drazek Rafik Dammak Pam Little
Marika Konings Caitlin Tubergen Berry Cobb
EPDP Phase 2Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council Leadership to inform the EPDP Team that the GNSO Council indicates its non-objection, as required per the EPDP Team Charter, for the EPDP Team to commence work on the System for Standardized Access to Non-Public Registration Data as well as other topics identified in Phase 2 of the Charter.
- Council to seek to provide guidance to the EPDP Team around timelines and deliverables for the EPDP Team in its phase 2 work.
Marika Konings Caitlin Tubergen Rafik Dammak
EPDP Team
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Keith Drazek to send an email to Goran Marby about the need to ensure EPDP Team and the Technical Study Group on Access to Non-Public Registration Data are informed of each others' work
2019 Council Strategic Planning Session Report
- Councilors to review and provide feedback to the Strategic Planning Session Report prior to the suggested deadline of Tuesday, 26 February 2019
Action Items Action Items Action Items
Public Comment: First Consultation on a 2-Year Planning Process
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Keith Drazek to send email to list seeking volunteers to prepare Council’s draft public comment to the 2-Year Planning Process, in time to meet the 5 March 2019 close date.
Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
...
- Council to consider whether existing mechanisms provide for sufficient opportunity to conduct “emergency” consultations to allow for GNSO Chair to gather input on certain topics and/or decisions that need to be taken.
- Council members to provide leadership team with feedback on leadership team’s performance & actions on a regular basis.
- Current Council Chair (Heather Forrest) to provide report at the end of her term outlining main challenges / concerns / recommendations in fulfilling the role.
- Council to consider whether Council leadership should have a contract / letter of appointment that would outline role, responsibilities and expectations.
...
- Council leadership to reach out to SG/C leadership to notify them of the changes made to the GNSO Operating Procedures and the requirements for SG/Cs to develop supporting procedures and processes.
- Staff to work on first draft of templates for motions related to EC powers as highlighted in the staff report (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-revisionsgnso-op-procedures-bylaws-staff-report-16may17-en.pdf).
...
| ||||||||||
Managing IDN Variants TLDs
|
|
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | |||||||
IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
|
|
| Staff preparing final draft for Heather and Susan's sign-off. | |||||||
IFR team |
|
| ||||||||
ICANN Org assumptions for new round of new gTLDs
|
|
| ||||||||
EPDP phase 1 recommendations |
|
| ||||||||
EPDP Phase 2 Work plan package
|
|
| ||||||||
RPM Charter amendments
TO BE MOVED TO PROJECT LIST |
|
| These actions are pending the Council's approval of a RPM Charter addendum to handle the Recommendation 5 referral via a separate work track. See below for an update on drafting work concerning this referral. | |||||||
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report
|
|
| ||||||||
CCT-RT recommendations
|
|
| ||||||||
Request for Clarification on Data Accuracy and Phase-2 of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
|
|
| ||||||||
PDP3.0 updates
|
|
| ||||||||
IRP IOT |
|
| ||||||||
ATRT3 Survey
|
|
| No GNSO Council response to ATRT3 survey deemed necessary. | |||||||
Questions from the RPM PDP Working Group Co-Chairs
|
|
| ||||||||
ICANN66 Draft Schedule
|
|
| Nathalie Peregrine |
2018 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
| SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Role and responsibilities of Council leadership |
| |||||||||
Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures and related governance documents to facilitate participation in Empowered Community
|
| |||||||||
What does Council need/want to achieve in 2018, and how to do this?
|
|
2019 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
| SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other
|
| |||||||||
| What is the GNSO Council and what does it do? |
| |||||||||
| Role and responsibilities of GNSO more broadly |
| |||||||||
PDP 3.0 - General Discussion on three Improvements (#2, #5, & #13)
|
| |||||||||
PDP 3.0 - Sub-group presentation and wrap-up
|
| |||||||||
Role and responsibilities of Council Liaisons
|
| |||||||||
| How to manage Council’s 2019 workload: strategies to increase effectiveness |
| |||||||||
| What does Council need/want to achieve in 2019, and how to do this? |
| |||||||||
Lunch with the Board
|
| |||||||||
| Wrap up and close of session |
|
Other Council Related Action Items
| Topic | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominating Committee (NomCom) Review Implementation Planning Team (IPT).
|
|
| Steve Chan |
...
- Donna Austin to share comments on scheduling of cross-community discussions with the GNSO Council.
- Staff to keep project timing planning document up to date and share it with the Council prior to every ICANN meeting to facilitate review and oversight of timelines. Explore whether there is a more dynamic way in which the document can be publicly shared.
- Council leadership to reach out to leadership of Curative Rights and Reconvened WG on RCRC to see whether it is feasible to deliver Final Reports within 6-month timeframe.
- Council leadership to notify ICANN Board with regards to PDPs that are expected to deliver to finalize their report shortly so that concerns or issues can be raised prior to GNSO Council consideration.
- Council leadership to request update from GNSO-appointed members to RDS Review Team at upcoming GNSO Council meeting.
- Council to explore mechanisms and tools for monitoring / reviewing costs related to PDP WGs with a view to improving efficiency and effectiveness
- Council members to review framework for post-implementation reviews and provide input. Council leadership to add this to an upcoming Council meeting agenda to continue this discussion. Council to consider forming a small group of volunteers to work with staff on further developing the framework.
Other Council Related Action Items
| Topic | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes
|---|
