Page History
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member | Info | Additional Notes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GNSO Prioritization
| Green
| COMPLETED |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PDP3.0 Final Report |
|
|
| Revised SSC Charter |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Managing IDN Variants TLDs
|
| ICANN
| send the updated Charter to the Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies and Nominating Committee (NomCom) appointees on the GNSO Council and remind SG/Cs/NomCom appointees that they should reconfirm their SSC representatives within three weeks following the 2018 Annual General
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance | Meeting.Incoming PDP co-chair
|
|
| Marika Konings | Exiting PDP Chairs
|
|
| Timing of ICANN bylaw mandated reviews
|
|
| Marika Konings | PDP 3.0
|
|
|
|
| Board request regarding emojis
|
|
| ICANN62 Meeting Planning
|
|
| CSC and IFR Review
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPDP 2 team request for input on data accuracy
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Project Change Request
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs PDP Project Change Request
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANN67
|
|
| k drazek | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget | CSC Charter Review
|
|
|
| to consider next steps, timing and provide guidance to ICANN Org on if, how, and when the review of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) should take place, factoring in ongoing discussion on the post-implementation policy review framework as well as the transfer issue that is being considered by the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Implementation Review Team.Updated Charter for the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance
|
|
|
|
2020 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The role and responsibilities of the GNSO Council as a member of the Empowered Community
|
|
|
| ||
PDP3.0 Improvements |
Michele Neylon Paul McGrady k drazek Stephanie Perrin Pam Little
Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine
GNSO members for the ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) Review Team
|
|
| ||
SPS Survey |
|
|
|
Heather Forrest Rafik Dammak Donna Austin
IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICANN Board Temporary Policy Proposal
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Heather Forrest Rafik Dammak Donna Austin
Consensus Policy Implementation Framework
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Councilors to review proposed amendments to the Consensus Policy Implementation Framework (CPIF) and if desired, disseminate to their respective Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies. The goal is to ensure feedback is returned to ICANN org in a timely manner and allow for them to provide a proposed final version by the end of July.
- Councilors to review Post Implementation Consensus Policy Review Framework (PICPRF) process diagram and complete survey by 18 May (see https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/postimplreview).
Heather Forrest Rafik Dammak Donna Austin
|
2019 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Role and responsibilities of GNSO more broadly |
| |||
How to manage Council’s 2019 workload: strategies to increase effectiveness |
| |||
Wrap up and close of session |
|
2018 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|
Role and responsibilities of Council leadership |
|
|
|
- Staff to update liaison document based on input provided and circulate it to the Council for further review and discussion.
- Council to reconfirm liaisons to PDP WG, IRTs and other projects once agreement has been achieved on the role and responsibilities of liaisons.
- Council leadership to reach out to SG/C leadership to notify them of the changes made to the GNSO Operating Procedures and the requirements for SG/Cs to develop supporting procedures and processes.
- Staff to work on first draft of templates for motions related to EC powers as highlighted in the staff report (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-revisionsgnso-op-procedures-bylaws-staff-report-16may17-en.pdf).
- Council leadership to develop clear timeline for action items listed hereunder as well as who will be responsible for delivering on these.
- Engage with PDP leadership teams at ICANN61 during GNSO weekend sessions to discuss state of work, identify challenges and possible paths forward. Council leadership team to review ICANN61 schedule and carve out time for this discussion.
- Develop a white paper on incremental changes to the PDP that outlines these discussions as well as main findings of staff discussion paper to engage the broader community in this conversation.
- Donna Austin to share comments on scheduling of cross-community discussions with the GNSO Council.
- Staff to keep project timing planning document up to date and share it with the Council prior to every ICANN meeting to facilitate review and oversight of timelines. Explore whether there is a more dynamic way in which the document can be publicly shared.
- Council leadership to reach out to leadership of Curative Rights and Reconvened WG on RCRC to see whether it is feasible to deliver Final Reports within 6-month timeframe.
- Council leadership to notify ICANN Board with regards to PDPs that are expected to deliver to finalize their report shortly so that concerns or issues can be raised prior to GNSO Council consideration.
- Council leadership to request update from GNSO-appointed members to RDS Review Team at upcoming GNSO Council meeting.
- Council to explore mechanisms and tools for monitoring / reviewing costs related to PDP WGs with a view to improving efficiency and effectiveness
- Council members to review framework for post-implementation reviews and provide input. Council leadership to add this to an upcoming Council meeting agenda to continue this discussion. Council to consider forming a small group of volunteers to work with staff on further developing the framework.
Other Council Related Action Items
Other Council Related Action Items
Topic | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominating Committee (NomCom) Review Implementation Planning Team (IPT).
|
|
| Steve Chan | Topic | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes