AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
ページ履歴
...
- AG: There is nothing to report at this time.
- CLO: The liaison page for the ccNSO has not been updated in the past 25 minutes, which is the last time the ccNSO met, but it will be done soon There is an application that is in good standing and is being processed by the ccNSO: ccTLD for Rwanda. There is also a furthering of renewed and reviewed ccNSO Statements that are being developed.
- b. ALAC Monthly Reports wiki page
- OCL: Please be sure to regularly check this page and read the reports. RALOs please make sure you submit your monthly reports too
- Items for Decision
6. Policy Advice Development Workspace -- Tijani, Olivier (20 minutes)
...
- DSSA Working Group Phase 1 Report - Comment Period closed 13 September. Reply period closes 21 October - At this stage there is to be no comment. Discussion will take place in Toronto.
- Draft Recommendations Overall Policy for the Selection of IDN ccTLD Strings - Comment Period closes 18 October - Edmon Chung to confirm if a Statement is necessary
- CLO: As you know, I am on the workgroup but I have interacted with Rinalia and others on the team. The latest I have heard from Edmon is that work is required on this Statement.
- OCL: May I ask that you or Rinalia liaise with Matt to work on this issue?
...
- OCL: On one hand we have Alan Greenberg, who is out GNSO Liaison and needs to have an answer for tomorrow's GNSO call. While on the other side, there is a strong sense within At-Large that these the RC and the IOC are two separate issues and should not be grouped together and this might lead to an ALAC statement to the Board..
- AG: The issue is that the drafting team has been working for a while on 2nd level protections. A compromise has been proposed that the IOC and RC are not looking for, but that most other constituencies are leaning towards. The compromise has two parts (1) It makes clear that in the long term, the first batch of PDP with regards to these two will be taken (2) limiting protection that is specific in the GAC memo to the GNSO. If the PDP given them protection but in the interim they do not have protection, they will be disadvantaged. If the PDP completes quicker, the issue is moot. If protection is not granted, then there will be costs to pay. If it is granted, it gets turned off if the PDP does not agree. There has been some discussion about separating them, that may happen during the PDP. My personal view is that it is a reasonable compromise. It is not giving the RD and IOC what they want, but it is granting them some protection.
- ST: Any recommendations we make would be reviewed by the board. One of the things that still concern me is that the Final Issues report is still not out.
- JJS: Reminded that Hong mentioned various international organizations that no one could say that we should distinguished between various types of international organizations. They all have to be treated in the same way.
- Rinalia: The issue is are we doing harm by ...(inaudible). not providing temporary protection. We have to provide temporary protection.
- AG: The drafting group is not looking at the long-term issues for IGO. We have to decide pending a PDP. The two issues are separate. The position of the Board claim that the Red Cross and IOC are unique, the position was pretty strong.
- IOC and Red Cross issues cannot be separated, like it or not – the GNSO has already ruled that they stay together.
- Consensus call is something that we need to work on right away.
- Whether the ALAC will support the PDP.
- Support of the PDP: Evan and Sala
- AG: Splitting the PDP is not today's decision.
- Should a PDP be initiated by the GNSO on the protection for the Red Cross, IOC and other IGOs and NGOs?
- Motion: Olivier Crépin-Leblond
- Seconded: Sala Tamanikaiwaimaro
- Y: Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Sala Tamanikaiwaimaro, Eduardo Diaz, Evan Leibovitch, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Yaovi Atohoun
- A: Jean-Jacques Subrenat
- N: n/a
- Do you agree, disagree, or abstain to granting both temporary protection?
- Motion: Olivier Crépin-Leblond
- Seconded: Tijani Ben Jemaa
- Y: Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Eduardo Diaz, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Tijani Ben Jemaa
- A: Yaovi Atohoun and Jean-Jacques Subrenat
- N: Evan Leibovitch and Sala Tamanikaiwaimaro
- OCL (chat): Alan will let it be known to the GNSO that there's support for PDP. Split regarding IOC/RC if the two are together. More support if the two were separated, with this benefiting the RC.
8. Update from Selected At-Large Working Groups - WG Chairs (15 minutes)
...
- ICANN Board Questions
- OCL: If anyone has immediate questions, please note them as there is only 1 question at the moment.
- GAC Questions
- OCL: Does anyone have any suggestions for this topic?
- SB: Just be sure that there is a special invitation from the GAC, which is called a high level meeting.
- OCL: I think we can work out cooperation as the agenda becomes finalized and we are closer to the meeting.
- At-Large Topics for Public Forum in Toronto Workspace
- OCL: If we give these Statements, I invite everyone to contribute to the wiki space. We need to have this task completed as soon as possible.
- Compliance Questions
- OCL: Garth will likely submit questions
- Global Partnerships Questions
- Communications Department Questions
...
- Existing At-Large Issue Briefing Papers:
- Domain Name Monetization - June 2008 | [PDF, 204 KB]
- OCL: Since we are all here, with regards to updating the current ones, what would the group think about this approach?
- EL: I was involved in some of the early briefing papers. I don't recall one being done at our request, but I think this is an issue for registrants and not necessarily Internet end users.
- AG: Monetization implies parked pages. I think this is an issue worthy of discussion.
- MH: We should make sure that these are drafted from the users' perspectives.
- RAR: Policy briefs like brochures should be live documents, continuously updated as the issues expand.
- Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) - June 2008 [PDF, 448 KB]
- New gTLDs - June 2008 | [PDF, 440 KB]
- WHOIS - June 2008 | [PDF, 172 KB]
- IPv6 Factsheet - October 2007 | [PDF]
- ST: It is within our scope it intersects with abuse of dominant position and egregious market behavior (concerning Domain Name Monetization)
11. Any Other Business – Olivier (5 minutes)
...