Page History
...
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Action Items: Action Item: Add details about the facilitative nature ICANN org will lead with as it relates to pro bono service providers, as opposed to match-making. Action Item: Retain language, or similar, “This should be considered a floor, not a ceiling, and ICANN should strive to exceed this minimum.” In addition, add to the rationale that adequate resources should be made available if the number of qualified applicants exceeds or greatly exceeds the indicator of success, since the indicator of success should be seen as a floor, not a ceiling.
Notes: Welcome and SOIs
Complete second pass public comment review – focus on suggested changes only – Guidance Recommendations 7-9 Input from staff: GGP support staff to develop language that notes the interdependence of at least recs 7, 8, and 9
Review outstanding staff input re: action items for Guidance Recommendation 2 and 5 Guidance Recommendation 2: ICANN org to formulate a response with respect to potential concerns, as well as applicants’ pro-bono needs, and bring it back to the WG to consider.
Action Item: Add details about the facilitative nature ICANN org will lead with as it relates to pro bono service providers, as opposed to match-making.
Guidance Recommendation 5: 1) GGP support staff to work with GDS colleagues to suggest language to the GGP for recommendation 5. 2) ICANN org to provide guidance on the feasibility of providing the data suggested by Com Laude (comparing rates of delegation).
Action Item: Retain language, or similar, “This should be considered a floor, not a ceiling, and ICANN should strive to exceed this minimum.” In addition, add to the rationale that adequate resources should be made available if the number of qualified applicants exceeds or greatly exceeds the indicator of success, since the indicator of success should be seen as a floor, not a ceiling.
Begin review of draft Final Report – final Guidance Recommendations, rationale, and deliberations (time permitting)
AOB
|