Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

For other places see: https://tinyurl.com/yc5bsvhd

Info

PROPOSED AGENDA


  1. Welcome and Chair updates
  2. Recap Outcomes from ICANN77 Meeting
  • WG to review draft Charter Question Responses to Remaining TDRP Charter Questions and updated TEAC response
    • f5) Do telephone communications provide a sufficient “paper trail” for registrars who may later wish to request a transfer “undo” based on failure by a TEAC to respond?
    • g3) If the TDRP is considered to be insufficient: i. Are additional mechanisms needed to supplement the TDRP? ii. Should the approach to the TDRP itself be reconsidered?
    • g4) Are requirements for the processing of registration data, as specified in the TDRP, compliant with data protection law?
    • g5) Are requirements for the processing of registration data, as specified in the TDRP, appropriate based on principles of privacy by design and data processing minimization?

     3. ICANN-Approved Transfer (Bulk Transfers)

  • Overview of Current Policy Requirements
  • Overview of Final Issues Report [gnso.icann.org]
    • pp. 49-51
    • ICANN org input
    • Public comments received
  • Charter Questions
    • i1) In light of these challenges described in section 3.1.7.2 of the Final Issue Report, should the required fee in Section I.B.2 of the Transfer Policy be revisited or removed in certain circumstances
    • i2) Should the scope of voluntary bulk transfers, including partial bulk transfers, be expanded and/or made uniform across all registry operators? If so, what types of rules and considerations should govern voluntary bulk transfers and partial bulk transfers?
  • Early input received
  • Initial Working Group Reactions


    4. AOB


BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS




Tip
titlePARTICIPATION

Apologies: 

Alternates: 

Attendance

...