Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Alice Jansen

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Alice Jansen

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

Would consideration of public policy aspects of ICANN issues be improved by (been impaired by a failure to):
- More specifically defining what constitutes a GAC opinion under the bylaws
- More specifically defining the process by which the Board seeks the opinion of the GAC
- Clarifying whether the process by which the GAC supplies its advice is intended to be iterative and if so, how to define and implement such an iterative process
- More specifically defining how the Board considers and responds to GAC advice
- Having the GAC engage other constituencies early in the policy process and if so, how to implement such a process
- Statement re: adequacy of Board assessment of GAC process.