Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

Summary

Board authorizes the President and General Counsel to enter negotiations relating to proposed commercial and technical terms of .TEL sTLD with applicant; if negotiation successful, President shall present proposed terms to Board for approval and authorization.

...

There was a discussion regarding the .TEL application and specifically around the issues of compliance with the technical requirements from the sTLD RFP. Raimundo Beca raised the point that the constraints on .TEL should match the constraints place on .MOBI with regard to the registry of E-164 in the .MOBI domain name space.

Wiki MarkupAdditionally, Michael Palage asked that the minutes reflect the following statement on his behalf \ [as an amendment to the minutes\], explaining his position:I was one of several directors that voted "no" in connection with the .TEL application, and there were primarily two reasons on which I did so. The first was in connection with the .MOBI contract which we had approved earlier in that meeting, and, specifically, in the .MOBI contract, there was a provision in Appendix S, Part 7, which states the following with regard to TLD differentiation: As quoted - 'ICANN and the Registry Operator acknowledge that a criterion included in the application process in which the .MOBI TLD was selected and in the previous TLD application expansion round was that a new TLD be clearly differentiated from existing TLDs. ICANN, when undertaking to effect the delegation of new tlds, shall take into consideration internet community input received, including any objections interested third parties may have under policy considerations or applicable law or otherwise regarding the creation of new TLDs.'

As I explained to the board during our teleconference, I was unable to understand the differentiation between the .MOBI and the .TEL TLD. I also brought to the attention of the board the potential confusion which one board member had in connection with a presentation that -- a flash marketing presentation that was available in connection with the .TEL application in which the board member thought it was actually .MOBI. So based upon this confusion, I thought that there was a basis for us to seek community input under this provision before moving forward with the .TEL.

...

So this follows up on Raimundo's concerns regarding potential ENUM implications, and also the distinction that .MOBI was geared towards, I believe, companies that were going to be providing services to the telecommunications -- to the mobile phone users and .TEL was geared more towards the individual users. I did not find that an acceptable delineation under the guidelines which we've -- which were stated here."
Following the Board's discussion during the meeting, Tom Niles moved for a vote on the following resolution, and Hagen Hultzsch seconded:

Wiki MarkupResolved \ [05.44\] the Board authorizes the President and General Counsel to enter into negotiations relating to proposed commercial and technical terms for the .TEL sponsored top-level domain (sTLD) with the applicant.unmigrated-wiki-markup

Resolved \ [05.45\] if after entering into negotiations with the .TEL sTLD applicant the President and General Counsel are able to negotiate a set of proposed commercial and technical terms for a contractual arrangement, the President shall present such proposed terms to this board, for approval and authorization to enter into an agreement relating to the delegation of the sTLD.The board approved the resolution 8-3 vote with two abstentions by Veni Markovski and Peter Dengate Thrush. Mouhamet Diop, Joichi Ito and Njeri Rionge were not present during the vote. Affirmative votes were cast by Raimundo Beca, Vint Cerf, Mouhamet Diop, Hagen Hultzsch, Thomas Niles, Hualin Qian, Vanda Scartezini, and Paul Twomey. Negative votes were cast by Demi Getschko, Michael Palage and Alejandro Pisanty.The Meeting was adjourned by the Chairman at 6:59 AM, Pacific Daylight Time.

Implementation Actions

  • Enter negotiations relating to proposed commercial and technical terms of .TEL sTLD with applicant.
    • Responsible entity: President and General Counsel
    • Due date: None provided
    • Completion date: May 2006
  • If negotiations successful, present proposed Propose terms to Board for approval and authorization if negotiation successful.
    • Responsible entity: President
    • Due date: None provided
    • Completion date: May 2006

Other Related Resolutions

Additional Information

Explanatory text does not modify or override Resolutions.  See Board Resolutions Page for more information.

Note: The "Add Comment" box below is for sharing information about implementation of this resolution. Off-topic comments will be removed.