ページ履歴

...

Matthew Shears from ICANN Board (He is along with Mandla working on the Evolution of the MSM) responded that the Board is very much aware, and will be coming back to the community once they've had the opportunity to digest various comments. Theresa Swineheart Swinehart also commented on the MSM in terms of operational perspective.

...

Maureen introduced collaboration & partnerships, and At-Large Communications Strategy. Especially focusing on GAC with policy and capacity building, as well as GNSO and ccNSO - with prominent ALAC / At-Large representation in their work groups. Noted that most of At-Large members not compensated, and are extraordinarily hard-working and invested in At-Large and the ICANN community. Leon commented it was effective engagement to reach across silos, noted that it is a Board priority to enhance relationships with the various ICANN communities - less formal, more relaxed way.168 .

Maureen introduced CPWG and At-Large policy activities, including the At-Large Policy Platform, focusing on security, stability and trust - turned over to Jonathan and Joanna for further discussion.

Jonathan watched meeting with commercial stakeholder group which has similar concerns to ALAC / At-Large. Mentioned Monday session with Compliance, and GoDaddy, etc. and various scenarios and how they would be handled. 2 observations: 1) everyone at an ICANN meeting are pretty much on the same side when it comes to DNS Abuse, 2) just need to align on path forward. Mentioned the ICANN understanding and that they boiled down to, how we might approach these changes / what is the process. But what is clear from Monday's session and from a policy perspective, is that Compliance lacks the tools necessary to combat systemic abuse (repeat offenders). Whether it's a PDP, changes to the contract. Asked Board for feedback on ideas themselves - personal opinions of members of the Board.

Göran Marby, ICANN CEO noted that DAAR is a very important tool to use in this process, as well as the health indicators. Alan Greenberg commented, "Taking down bad actors. That is EXACTLY what we are asking ICANN Org and Contractual Compliance in particular. What tools do you need?"

Becky Burr said the issues presented are right on point, need to understand tools and have collective consensus. Alan formally commented that we need to have consensus on tools and ICANN scope. Göran responded that the health indicators noted there are 5 registries that account for (90% - ?) of all DNS Abuse. Ron da Silva noted that there is an expectation ICANN Org can update via contracts, that there is a gap between expectations and actual action. What are expectations, what is not happening? Then either put into contracts or embed language into various policy processes within ICANN. 

Jonathan 

177 participants

Action Items